Barrie Examiner, 20 Oct 1910, p. 6

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

A. D. Cartwright, Secy. Board of` Ry. Commission, re Rik:S' and Wood I land's crossing, enclosing copy ofi the assistant engincer s report in connection with these crossings, and asking for our concurrence thereon Whereas no plan accompanied said] report, the Clerk was instructed to} ask fora cony of plans showing loc- ation of overhead bridge. AL _ _ _ . .-_L ,1 v____, an , ~< At request of James Rrss, Esq., on motion of Smith and McArthur, permision was granted to him to cut and remove maple trees opposite his lot, whalf lot 21, con. 6. as its usefulness as ashade tree is about done. .. Iavw ... ....-.. nnnldvvul The matter of spending money on townline oi Oro and Medonte from Coulaon to Craighurst was taken up and discussed, and owing to several bridzes to build in the interior ' of our township, and other expenses, it was` azreed not to make any grant on Townline this year. c On motion of Smith and (`ockburn ordered. that 850 be granted to out hill on road between can. I and 2, opposite lot 37, and that Charies Church see the money expended. On motion oiCampbe1'l and Cock- burn, accounts to the amount of 833 were ordered paid. rV...._-n _.a_-....._..u . ,,,_ . `V (\- -You certainly cannot aord to buy at a store that cannot word to advertise." nu:n':u')u on Denau 01 me names` Institute of Shanty Bay, asking for permission to make beauty spots in our township. This request was duly considered and laid over for further consideration. I A n n-_A_,_;,L4 4-. , U` . . G. W. Brooks made applicaton to purchcse the hemlock tree oppositel his property. on Ridge Road. Reeve to act In this matter. ' ---y-V-nu vn uula IIJULIUIL Report of-F. H. Ball: Your commit- tee composed of Mcssrs. Ball and |Smith -appointed at last meeting of [Council to examine crossroad be- ;tween lots 35 and 36, on the 1st con- `ceion, beg toreport aslollows--We met on 22nd Sept, and made a care- {ul and thorough examination of what we believe to be the proper line and we are of opinion that the pub- lic benet dcvrived from it if opened up and improved would not be com- mensurate with the large expenditure of` monev nomsxznrv and Irnnl n..,.~_ .- ............... -_-an um -n-:5: capcnuwule of money necessary. and would there- fore recommend that no action be ta!:~en. We also examined`tbe line he- Lwee-n the first and second concession a7~r.rai`.e lots 36 and 40, 9.12.1 fcund l-`Ira. Kine xvhiln from-Allin ..,,..6\-.- 5.. land Mu:-taut,` have had before them the bequest 0! Mr. Nicholls with regard to the setting of his assess- men and at sststed sum tor a term 01 years on certain conditions and alter considering the same is 0! the [opinion that the sss:ssm.nr. roll ~being revised and adopted by the |Court of Revision this Council has 4no power to act and would recom- mend that the matter of assessment he 1-.-hr:-sari fn Hm ..........- mm unuuuu nun ununpucu, l'I:pUl'L EUUPIDU Reeve Ball reported: Ireceived a letter from Mr. Frederic Nlcholls and also a. verbal reguest to have chc line between the 2nd concession and 1st Range from Ridge Road to Lake changed from prcsent location to proper place or take the necessary step to have it established where it now .a at an .muIv am. An ho - --g- [ when buying a sirloin of beef avoid the end piece, for it has a. larger por- tion 0:. bone on the upper side, and the meat is lnlerlor to the centre cut 10 An I...-.- _ _-_.1-_ 1- _ VA A-V

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy