The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

L|'II|r ILIIIIIV Ill G III?-l Irlllll WVCIJII . Wlhartever the members of the Government may sag` asbout coalition tihere Vuan he mo outbt as \to;.t-he n+I>N*nl`n nu` `Hiya flaunt-n-nnonf Arman Lulu .;uug'xueuI. .` The editorial. so true, so `indicative of a change of Government.'so clear in its portrayal `of the swift and certain judgment" continues: ' There is but one thing open to the Liberals of `Ontario. and that thing is their first and m6ost~press- ing duty; The ibarnazcles on the ship -must be treated with an iron hand. [The interests of the Lib- eral party are su rior to those of {any individual an `the interests of ithe Province are superior over all."l y . \ Since the writingoof the barnacle editorial I have n'ot..heard that any of those rare and inspiring moments [of vision `have come to the Globe. ibut let us hope for the best. 'Dhe Wpresent distress" -began and com- tinued under the present administra- tion. The logical conclusion us. that we cannot have a change o,Govern- ment too soon. Vl'3l|Ul..l 9|. LVUVULIIUUI` O. L300. (.119 pt. hetlc ed'itor_ sa.-w January 25, 190 . as `the "dgy `of swift and cer- L.`!.. :--).._....._Ll that.~`u1 the spirit of -that Sabbath; vision of November 8. 1903. the? ntlfnr nnnnr Tnnunnvon 0: I {V1.10} `U-B IUU L131.` tam Judgment." The editm-ial. s NOTICE 01? our: GREAT WHITE FAIR LATER ox CIEILUL B1'.l'VV I.!`i1l..I|.liI1_y Ed, "day `of awnnnf P THE COALITION. [_;_'1`1mr`e -have been few ocslggz which -appealed. so strongly t0 (H independent elector as the Drew, The, Government has been a '13. gresaor. Them is a great mof_3 sue benore the people. Navy.` ,1 b, _er, `must ind.-ivid_ua'l responsnbulxty W -r_ooagnized., Everyone must b = ;t_i}j.hlmI01f_-,F015,-0110 go any U1" `,1, " .'B.1W ai795~1Yot6l:~ Liberal `he ' L ' aiagk 4: that tony | _ C'0.1`I'uPt Governments are retaixl-?d ,1 D0`-We!` `bit the unwavering pull` loan. 'Dhe resent Government would zprot have een so brazen and fallen imtooo such` "evil ways bad it not k_nown that it could rely on the -pal`- txsan who boasts that he :1lw:1.V;" votes fox; `his party. No -party 15 always nght or always wrong. 50 >eleotor1 can {be of servzce to his par` ty andjnfluence it or good by 193' 1:;-n" "itjbde known that he has suff1_`_r- xien In e ndenoe Ito o ose lt- W1l&t_ influgfnce '-for good hagptzhe 910 for Who. while he sometimes C093` lglains and Ideplores. always votes 191' l is party? (The mseful citizen I9 .the man lwho can vote against 11 `naffv, li`.m- Hhn inclnnannnk nh\f',[0r LHU 111111-I W110 can Vote c'.1g3.lU5l ' garty. For blhe independent aloof? o assert -his power in this crisis may mean success to Mr. Whitney: but. far more. victory for indeoend' mice. It will- pnove that no 10,113` er ogxn a Government offend a:3.`" nublx_o. morality and rely upon .5: partizans to line up and rescue i'_ 1_n` the hour of danger. As an . act lesson in public morality If `V ' e` _waort`h' countless sermons or .{bogals-* i A edi- until some definite issue arises._or until the people are prepared to give confidence without reserve to one arty or the other. We have no lief whatever in coalitions enter- ed into for the sake of "dividing of-_ fines or on the principle that hair the loaf is. better the: none. The sole question to -be cons: ered is `that of honest. steady and efficient gov- ernment for the Province of Ontario. : ...... ..It is. we say. upon Provincial issues that `Ontario parties should be formed. and no doubt. in order to reach the condition. a, fusion of the existing vparties. with an equal representation of each in the Gov- ernment would be necessary ........... .. Such an arrangement would involve no humiliation to Mr. Ross or Mr. \Vhitney, would give each party gm equal ,voice in determining Provincu! policy for the present, would the strongest men of each party `:11 the head of affairs. and would en- sure the- existence of a Government {strong enough to give the Prov- mce pnogressive administration." pu ` 4 ..Atte'r such a guarantee of -:lz.:1`r.-1c- ter and ability to Mr. W~hitn9y and _the leaders of the Opposition by the Government organ. It is too late in the day or the Government and` {he Gloobe to declare {hat the 0pp0SitI0_" Is not capable of governing tins Province. I THE INDEPEN DE NTS. wou-Iu Letter -from Rev. D. C. Hossgck on that .l;oVsitiont of the)` %tt,7-tGlothe upon`Coalit_ion ind Corruption. and Stating the 7 I Causes of the f~'Presnt Distress---A'n`Examination 1 V of the Attacks Made upon Him for His Prev-A t tt ions Letter~--The Duty of Independent 0- 19' VO Z \O0-&o.I 1 The G1-oh'e-vied-itorial' is a tmyaei "otabuse. One would have t.houg.ht that the editor, if he had any de_- "fence for. the Government. might have used this editorial space to7bet- ter advantage. fllhe Globe said :' W-hat Jnatter `thougih with E. King Dodds. he `did campaign against tem- perance legislation in the interest of t-he liquor traffic '3" In 1884, lwheni I was a student. I cleliveycd in my native county four addresses against the Scott Act. I believol the Act would delay `batter legis- lation. that it could not he enforcecl. and. it carried. would soon be repeal- l ed. I thought `that it was a.` `de- -viee` to keep from the temperance people the legislation which they de- sired, '1`-he loaded referendum of ya later day was a similar device. I stated `my position. clearly and every one understood it; I was not retain- ed by the liquor party. and did not campaign in their interests; A charge similar to the 'Globe`s was made. some -years ago. `by a Consen- vative paper. The charge was with drawn and an -apology uhlished. The Globe, editor. annoye that he `had no defenicesearched the past of twenty years ago to find some_bh'ing to inaure my reputation. - . . -Tha lnhn nl-an maid `I-hair T urn : Tc) the Independeni: Eie'ctors:`_ {A1 V Gentlemen.--An ope}; letter to the} G. W. -Ross. in which Ien-3 ;~de"nvored "to present fairly the pol- itigal condition of the Province. has.` not bad-any adequate reply. 1'! - IV__......_..'..& 2. --...I_... .I.L-- IE..-` ---- won, -v----`--uuv ww`-ugw fill a Government is under the tire 1 of criticism one of the tests oliits fitness to be returned to office is its defence. It it `has `any, defence the Government organs ought -to be able to present it in a reasonable way. of course it there is novdetencc there will be at great; temptation to meet criticism with abuse: `IV: 1 L0 ll-|J|-""3 11!] l'U]_Jl.H)i1C!Ull- "1_`he Globe also said that I was gui1ty*of co netting with `both po"iit- ical attics - efvone the last election and tiat about the same time Ivyx-. ected `a favor from Mr. W'h.itn.ey.` his statement is `false. I asked "n-othinp: from Mr. Whitney. expect- ed ntoi :'hing. and would have accept- ed not-hing. I was and have alwa 3 been as free to criticise Mr. W}: t- ney as Mr. Ross. ~I have been of.`- fercd nnotxn-inavtions from both parties. and I havcalways declined.` Before tlieiast Provincial election I did not seek a nomination. I did not desire one`. and I would not have accepted one. I havenever desired a nomina-A tion since. T ` . The.Globc ins .nua.te`d that I was a vdisgruntled office seeker. This is "untrue. I never had ti personal` grievance against the Ontario or Ot-V; ta`\va. Governments. or any` megnberg `or either Government. I never re- ceived a personal -favor from either Government and was "never refused on_e. The `last commu_nic.~.ition I -re. ceived fnom_ the Ottawa gave;-nment, wavs .a cordiai letter raqtuesting me to be ,a candidate in `their. interests. '|1n I!`-Lu` n`-an nn:Ao nI'.!:- an-5 :n -w ntnv-v vnovovovocn vv even in IOUVVI While I am aware that tire private affairs of an elector. who has had no active-part in politics. are at little interest to the public. I think that the reply of the Government organs `to my letter 'is- at some `importance. The more .30. when the same method of reply "is adopted with everyone who -differs with the Government. v-w - w-v-an-'-wv Reasons for not publishing the lettenwere given by the Globe at-g~ ter day otprotound silence in in column editorial of great wrath. One reason assigned was it had al-` ready been published in the evening newsspapers." This was not true. as the letter was given to The Globe at 9 a. 111.. Dec. 19. in time for the evening edition.` which the edi.tor~ boasts .is as large `as that of any other evening paper in Toronte. I'\'K\f\CII'\\YAV AIIIIQAEIP R UI'lIH.lllHJ.LU III 'LU".'ll' lllLUl'U3L`h ` U0 `U0 , The Globe also said: "His past is uh-equere ." I graduated at Knox. College sixteen years a 0. when I! was a young man-. and have-been `a. minister in good standing of the Pre3byterian`cn11u}'eh ever _sm_oe. _No one `has `ever land apharge agaxut my character. The -edntor was aware `of `this when -he wrote me edi_torial.| I --xuuo -- . ---up -- ggqn-- . `pa. you-ow vv uvmn vuv vv av Land vuovvuownu NEW FAMIL1.'vCOMPACT.- The failure of the Government to reply. to charges made against it. and the campaign of abuse. in whieh manv government organs are engag- ed because the Government has no defence. indicate the necessity or a`ohange. But thereis another mat- :ter for consideration. Not only by ;the` Gvovernment has the Liberal par- --gyyheen disgraced. but by the -com- } inatuon _ol'-ywhxeh the Government ; is '-tthe centre`. _'I`.he.r_e existevca-n -or-g-V za,-nize'd itvranny. . which has ;bee`n,-:. de- vebuped-byi~.1on3 ottiee-holdnn'.;_`: _It, my?-hone oppogee >Ithe i new ;I_-nnly' va,e$t_ zhe fis'hur_1-`zed .t_o" jml. . it `+4: n::'-`ire-`ul3arRed.:_w1t:31,en oI_fenoe.. o t_. -h1s.;pr`yete?h-te 18 -aeeaileyd... data; item`! `iWb&- ` ` An Appeal to Liberals. -.w.-v-g`: r - -v- PEasoNXL' A717'rAcI<'.' Electors. The strongest evidence against a man is his own admission. Is not. the G-overnment condemned out of its _own'mouth or by the chief organ which 1'epresen":s it? It is in wiliim of human nature that a man will severely criticize a friend and `be very angry if another employ like criticism. When I reviewed` the `course of the Gcviernment. t.he Bil- lingsgate vocabulary `of the Globe was let Loose upon me. All this time _-t-here~ was in t.he file of the Globe a condemnation of the pres- ent distress" as severe as any pub- lished by me. How do we account for this phenomenon? 'l:.here have been `two occasions. and to t'he `best i -of my knowledge only two.when is some ha-ppy com-bins i on of circum-': stances. -not only has the edited been : free from the controlling` hands. of n his directors. but there have recur- red to him the conscientious scruples of former days. Even -to the Globe there are. vouchsafed a few rare moments of impiirtiality. ' I need not say -that _on these occasions the Gl-obe is at its best. -It is during: these miomentsof independence and vision" that it is reliable. On one of these rare oc_c-asipns the Globe contained the editorial which fol- ilie-ws. When I remember that it was during, the present a-dministratiaoii i that `such `a condition as the editor ~ describes. developed, and read the ' Globe's. pitiless condemnation. I won- * u1'u.urx, Iul. B'pl:\:U'u'p '3ll:|u ua-Luca ULIP. `fie um ienwhle." Can It be that the us true 111 the United States. and that xn Q-1nad_a.a Luberal dare. not exigrees lus op-.n_1onet The Domnmon Al xanoe complaaned because the Gov ernment bnolm its ledges. They were at once ettac ed.- When .a Liberal enters a protest against cor- ruption. the servants of the machine,` unable tomake any adequate reply ` to charges establxshed by the court 3. ~ cheap abuse. upon him. 'I`hev_ do not ; thesxtate to attack men lnke -;`Mr.; Blake. Walter Mills and others who zre prepared to suffer. if thereby? hey may serve their country. , J THEGLOBE ON CORRUPTION. _what` a_ whirlwind of abuse was about: him! 'l`.he,neme of Blake re- calls the -old days. Let Liberals com :pa,re the giants of the dogs of Bald.- win and L:-.tonte'in_e wit the fol- towis who are muequeradinggne Lib-4 erals in our day. William Hume Blake. in days gone by. was the lion of -the` etorm garty. He `served i the eoun ry in t e daysof the tirst ;Family compact: we live an the days of the second. His son. Edward ilake. was Premier of Ontario. He* would have become Premier or the Dominion had he not teltit ;his_duty ; to enter. upon aanother_ .. olitieel etru le in the lands cit his atherl. The e_torm iparty has hedno greet-` i er family than the Blakes. No ta.In.- 1 ily has givenmore eibility. time `and ; money to the service of the L|bO!:3l party and the country. '1`.he evils against which Wiliam Hume Blake [nought long ago. like theolionishat he was. were no greater than the BJDUSBB which his son, Mr. -;-B. E. Blake opposes now. Mr. 5. E. Blake eminent citizen and zphilanxthnopist wot note. because he opposed corrun- tion. is denounced [by the `friends of the Government. n_1~a.squerading as Liberals. while the once great Lib- ieral art . file `u ` ev'1da . `s ;dupedp anyd diisggacelgfn 1. ya I ` LIBERALISM A1`ID LIBERTY- If Libgralism stands or anything surely Ii is freedom of speech. "Lbbert -of speeo-ha" said James Otis. "in Sun innmhln " nn H ha lial I'h3l co9ooooooooooboooooooJooo9090000090ooodoooooooooooo W ? Q _ Ross and His T Machine so Described by 3 Liberal T ` \ Journal. ` In the prvovindiat`baff1_irs in Ontario. the big. qustion at -is- su_e~ will .`b__e the purity of the baU:0t. - '1Yhe orgies (if the _org'a.niz*.ers iI1us't cease; and the electors of Canada will, -`demand that lactrion crooks *dh`all' be placed in straigzht-jackets. T - " ' - V Clean elections we must have. _ A verbal depreoation of oorru_p'tion is not sufficient for the people. V 5 M ` ' V ' T _ It is not" from_'C_onse1"vati.vesV albne t:hat thTe c_all_ for the S11-p- pre~ssE,on` of evil comes. Here *is the vstateme'ntV [of the \ot-. t-wwa Free `Press. the Liberal or-g:m a'tA t'he'.oa'pital: ' _Thepe:ep1e are losing fitithe in. the politicians of Oritarid and the cry is for a` man that willinot. The man at the ihead of a business` house is held responsible jtor ,.1rthe had goeds.._whieh" he delive`rs_.i_ _ ! x -To dep.re9'a*te, Vthes acts} , i tnot fto ; dehunciat'e "7%thex'n.' The `people `ask `that denunciatiqne. follwed-.byfqtuiok cornea-1-io`n of these 4frau`ds.j-ba_l?lot-box, +stg1l_iVng .,; .re_1_e`qting. fzfagxgiulenti rggistra-" t'ion.,_:andx"dootoi-eg1V'f-L`;"t;r;1".`;;- . "The .-pvolitioal ~ s_a.nntils .o5'.'the, -prov-i.n`ce'-1n_`ing ha.n;e_ to every Daxfty vm`a:n.- j ' .. -` V - ' ' < -4:, The orn-izer.ahd, his madhiane` must , vanish. His zhuman tools `have lbeeji` found - guilty of evei'y_unsavory po1i.ti-cal trick. and Vdevice_k1i vwn` to the f knavish mind. ' % ` "Since -the .d;nys:To`E'}Willi_ min 5% ;pm{ ,Mapknzifq- _~in jonitariq the V `names xdfj Reioryagr , V;-. .1;`iv fr purity. for '_Lu'-p-4.` richtness;;%and';tvr%A;1f9svtab1aLd% 1`?n% A nd Qoaivls xv i1:1J:n A Crew of % Crooks. ' r,, .,` `x _ , ' ._ - ,...`.;.,,. tutti; ruoreucua uuu lJ.l..lU5 .UlUBl.` .The curse iofolitics in every Legislature from alitaxlto Victor- ia. and in.t*he Senate and House. of Commons at Ottawa. is the notion that political conduct has no rela.- iton to the Ten Coinmnndments. that party expediency is the first law of politics. that being found out is only political -crime. '1`.hat notion is the political creed 01: those wiho aver -t'h_at they are not in politics for their healtih. of those who at- te_ct t-o sneer. at Sunday School 01- itics, and of t-hose_ who defend vi est political crimes with the devil's ar- gument that elections are .not won 37 _ray`er., That doctrine is the aciis descensus Averni" of' Can- adian politics. It has d-ama. ed be- yond repair_mo_re tshan one_ overn- ment-. and is the almost incura'bl-e nialady of `both parties. Th8.pl`838nt distress in _t~he Ontario Legislature. the uncertainty of the Government's life and `the derelict helplessness 3-4` '4-uh-n l\nnnuH-inn in nnf flan nnnnlf lll uuu. L116 ILULUIIUL HUIPIUBBHUEB of the Opposition.` is not the result of accident or of blind. reasonless fate: it is the. N"-emesis of politioal erim_e.. the inevitable outcome of the `defying and outraging of moral law for the sake of party gain. From the_days of Simone`: first parliament until now there have (been among ness, and _stomet-hing oi their is- sue in humiliation and loss has oome upon this generation. And to the heritage of the past we have added -our own iquota `of easy political virtue and lust for political power. `Um nnnn kn in o unnv-ain nlirvhr fhnn us. `in `both political parties. tor.oes_ making steady for polftioal upri_gh_t- ` VIFLUU G11 llflo lJUl.`I_[)U.lIl.l~Ui.l.l PUVVOL. We ma be In a worse plighp than our fat em. but the burden 15 well nigh intolerable, and unless _1ifted wi 1 crush as a mililstone the `hie of our nation) . ` I819: " The canker of corn), tion has ent- en too deefly Winto `he iheart-`pf Canadian po itios to have the malady roux-ed by any judioial.pronounee- rment. beiit never so gust; or. `by many enactments pf Parliament. `they never so wisely -frtamed. A boodler here and there might be discovered and punished. a -grafter here `and there might becut voff. done Government might `be destro ed and another set up: but all "t at would tend}: only the s_urf`aee corru tions 92 `the disease. it would hea but slightly ,the `hurt of the -bod ipolitic. The poisson is in the bloc ; the` heart beats -falsely. and nao'r1e.- medy willevail that does not strike Am;-n {-1. Han -cnrinon ni` nur nnlitinal i This is the lan uage of the Globe`? when at its hes . f`T.he' poison Is` in the blood.. the heart .beats_ false-3 `liy, and no remedy will avarl that! oes not strike down to the springs ; of our political thought `andaetivit ; with a power that recreates an 1 makes .e lean., A.adeplorable condi-x ti-on! If I had used suehlanguagej "a chequered past" would be _com-4 plimentary to- the Ian uage the i.Gl`obe would have used. f the de- script-iaon of the p_re-sent istress` is correct. what -18 the emedvtl 1 The -only remedy is the defeat of the 1 `Government under whicih the `'pre-! sent. distress" has _devel-op`ed. J IIVL- 2u..I_.. .`.. .\_......n...$:- .- _-!:~,n1nnnn` ` BUUl- QIBLIVUBB HHS _u'DVUl`U U!-lo The Globe is em~pna.tic. it declares` it that `t he Liiberal party has an almost i incurable malady. It states that the ` _`_`resent distress" is not the result 0 accident or of blind. reasonless fate. Quite.'true. Corrupt metihodsi had something to do with it: the: failure ftoo IJ\lnlSh46lllpl`ltB named by. the Jud es: Caaptain Sullivan's tiin-I bar limi s and many other incidents` which do no honor to the Govern-1 merit are closel related to the "pre- ; sent distress. What does the` Globe mean !by its `reference to "lust. for political power"? Is not the lust for political power cf the Ross` Government. which desperately j clings to office. largely the cause of the "present distress'?. . . - n1_i|.- s__..L|_2_ _._.. meuy wuruvuu `LLIIII. `wyus nus. a_u._us.-u down to the 'sprn_ngs or _our.polmoal thought and aotnnty wnth 8. power that recreates and makes clean, H'l'lm mu-an nf nnlii-inn in omarv `def why the organ is so anxjyi vfitghg So seldom is the Globe in this rqre I mood` it will be well to examine: again the closing sentence. "We! may not be in a worse plight `than ogr fa_thet~s. but the burden is well msrh nntolerwble. and unless lifted" will crush as :1 m.il.lstone the life of the nation. The diagnosis ofi TELLING CENSU-RES. ~ 'I' A L the Globe is good.vbut no-reme is offered. It is unnecessary to sug- gest one. There is. for such a dis-- ease. only one remedy known {to the student of politics and that is a change of government. 'I.f\C`T.` KI\`7E`il"Y A n73`? . gtha, . `.7 - V ,, ,.__ Surely `never came to any one a `clearer p hetio vision. The egiitor is enraged cause it is now claxmed that his pnaph!e'oy.fhas been tulfi1led.. when Government hns"dr1fted."'1)hexrs has `been a"pol_icy of, "sv9al;ness andi V toIly,!e` '*- Su1;ely' their attntude hag- ` 0 it: :.,!.`95S%.tLV.9 -e"` '-q.`?7~` .73? ;~-.`d``1.M` aM...:.:4.;.;?%;:;!.%$3:.e1_..,.`3..eases S.ALE'- EAT VICKERS v `!The present distress has not come by accident or chance. or as the result of a c.h:ange of Govern- -ment policy, and not at all because of any Igrowt_:h_ of power or prestigwe in the Oppvosntxon. It_ha-s come through the 'cooling enthusiasm and slacken- nng effort of not a few -Liberals. And.t-he secret of it allisin the~dis- credxted election methvode sometimes ressorted to. `and -the activity of the political -paraeutes who make party; service a means ~ of private g:nn.'~ Because of the electoral corruption here and `the prominence of party heelers there. Ontario Liberalism has ; lost somethnng. of} Its old-`timeeeelf-w Ire; ect. :and rte note of condent} :31} public _sp:rited enthusiasm haul `lost something of strength and re-- -sonance. . . ' "What. then is the first duty tout Ontario Liberals? To let things drift? That is. the policy of wag mess and folly ................... .._\ negative attitude and an uncertzgm control would but give ooportupxty to cor- norate andvoapitahst plundgners to feed `fat on the public dlomjmq. And from `the part r.p_oint of new-ito `drift would-."be. be part -of, tools. tor for s'w_`_i.ft_'-a'n`d e'rta'in judgment." . the reokoninghday would come a'l{a"y' _ . r Luau. uuav .uav_u uuu umcercalu 0011- *tno1? f"1`o. _dr1fAtV wqulidibe the part .foola.'."_,M}any -hay~e*.3c;houg`.hj: so.` but hajtgte:l_i`;'to -1_l`8e_.f the _ avtther I ndelicato- 219158 9. -or th.e.ved:t'or+ L."1` 1e;_-teokt-V ` of, aw;it:. ~ind-5-'drs-f up -ya.-`panes: up- eva- MORE CON:I;F.J-LEIEKTION. `n `on"y. "ov. '. .- e 0 M da N 19th 1903 th `Globe published an editoriel. An- other rare moment of visxon" had arr_nved. Whether the Sabbath ex-' ercxses -Md exerted a fbenefncent in- ` fl_uence u on the editor a_nd his ; durectors gs never 'been dxsclosedg aowever. btlnat `may be. I ask the ; lrelectors to read some of the state-r {menteanade in the `Globe editorial.1 `I cannot vquote all the paragraphs `because the pressure of matter 1'69; quires that "preference be givne `t0! thosetheat m-aketheir points without any unnecessary waste of space." Moat, S in and Remnant ! ,"'1Yhe _condition of the Conservative }party us not we first concern of `Ontario Liberals. nor is their;.fi}`st duty the reorm of the OppOS`iti0n in `the Legislature. There is a mote `in our own eyes winch must be taken out if they woulgijudge just- ly the quality of theur opponents. or see clearly. the way in? which they themselves _shoi'ul _walk. and the public service `they are in duty `bound `:0 l`B!1d0!`........s.' nnnn u_ oooooooooo u 4 \J ' . . - V . T V t 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOCfOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQ _ 'OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO9 our cons ond` SKIRTS must; be ALL sow bef'ore the 1st of February end believing in the old aeage, Money will do many things, we give a liberal *part-in some cases half of the regular price to every buyer. Our read)-t0-wear department, as everybody knows,is a crediteto the mercantile progress of the town, and when such an opportunity is offered to save on such worthy g0ods~-its a duty to buy if youhave any usei1'at_o all for the goods. L " EVER BEFORE` hafve you had an opportunity to buy a Coat or Skirt at such A a. bargain price as is marked in the newest of the season's output at this popular store. ` GEORGE VICKEIRS Ladies coats; Ladies Skirts, % A children : Illsters, Misses Skirts, and all the Odd Lengths that have accumulated In Dress Goods, Flan- nals, Art Muslins, cretonnes, cot- tons, Walsiings, etc., efc., etc., at a Genuine argain Price. Iuvasncxra and Pnorrr by Your vasrr T % v--\.1-,%--r , uuu IIIUUC IL`llR`l.L JILL}. VVx1.ll|..Uy uuu a number of his associates a1\eu'_`q'uali- tied for Cabinet posxtnons. It 13 now i too late for the Globe to declare; the are incapalblcs. Mr. Whitneyt _dec ared eatedly that coalition was propose Ito him. The otter was [made he said on three occasions. - It was made !by' a caahinetr minister, [After a` Long sjlencc Mr. Ross dis- cussed the sdbyect in ..a characteris- _tic way . As usual he dodged the `Issue. He. did. not deny tzhct the o otter was`_made Ibu't_: he aid it was not made m a certa-an way. . `lnhznrl-nunr i-I-no qnovnhnru aw! vlvl-us JJIJU QIUUV IIEIUU ILBUU OINII I L I911 01] aept. 11. 1902: aiso 3n Sept.`17. 1992. The G`.-Inhn n`:-mid - 4 Many independent "electors. while unable to support the _Ross Govern- ment. are asking if Mr. Whitney could form a sufficiently strong` Government. Of late the Globe has been charging G-with incapacity. not only ' the Opposition but everyone who opposes the Ross Government. If the Government and the Globe believe the -Boss Government incan- \ able why was the coalition proposed? The offer of caa1i'tion.1s a: guarantee to `the v. eopie by the Government and G1 .t-hat Mr._W.hitney and K of his associates arae"auali- IJIIULU U611 '05 Ill IIUWUL H5 \LU \"L'LlU `attitude of Ttqae Government organ. llhe Gldbe discussed` coalition on rnnf 11 `ln glans an Gan! `i IDA`) "It the `country gives a decisive {qlajoritg to Liberals or to~Conserva- tnves -t ex-e_ will be p'arty~ Govern- ment. If "at "refuses to do that,- some other plan mmst be devised. .There is no use in saying `England not lovevconlitiona. if the "pea- . ye: `by theii`Av\oba.-:renti.er_any plgher md sot; __V'G`9y'e`tnment . um ossuble. :21: v . {a1&tx%ge:' _ ` oi` ' '- "ed?i`tori`al."~the emu I. Said, , `_`;Wit}l1ont~ therefoxje, concedin `~ ?iy:=gg-.x:_ent; 1; at an an ;;F584`:.L` hhir; .`i .'V` omin {(4 LUVC 9 G cup. LL. _ ' The Globe ea-xd: