The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

j o. -- peeeee ze Fa; ~: pan@,"" f | most ng and injurt [¥ Abvi, / hi O_tnwfbrd. CC ;'fi?'g::. | and he insisted that the medicat \Evanturel, Fallis, Farwell, Ferg * | the . Provi hould be. consulte -- Field, Garrow, German, Gibson (Hamil-- I rovince shou btil "I (Crforg . Coad i (Huron), Harcourt, Hardy, | fore passing such & .. Interfer J8, Hisco Hobbs, -- Howland, \ vith the tarift--of fées, he thoug! ; 1. _ Little, Loughrin. ; would be parallel with inferference hb Q ° w ard) * McKay (Victoria), | the Government with the feea get by + m . _ Mc h. Magwood, Marter, the Patrons in their lodges. He con-- upgflf\anl Middleton, Mis-- | | cluded with a detailed review of the Moore, -- Mowat, _ Mutrie, | i points attacked by the bill and -- the "'Paton, Preston, Reid (Addin#-- | | amendment already given. 4 _' Richardasom, Robertson, | Robil-- | _ Mr,. Haycock ininmediately availed lC k St,.. John, Strat-- l | himself of the fact that the amendment "uRitney, Willough-- } | put him in order, and spoke briefly in P | reply to Mr. Stratton. . As for leaving > * t " | the matter to the medical men, he said, THE MEDIGAL ACt. 1 | they might as well wait till the manu-- irwps:: d after Mr. | (facturers asked for a reduction of the Public iN . t, an ** r 4 | protection given to them, or for the, Fla{it's encun the geg'jra] "'ad | | Senate to move for'its own abolition. Ct D: d been "_'":'i' 'xa\'\]r'nt fin,B ] \ As for the statement.that the legal pro-- s Mard's bill to amend the dit@nes | \fession Bas a similar control over Its nd watercourses act had been given j | members, he replied that two wrongs is second reading, Mr. Haycock moved | i 'do not make a right. Mr. Stratton' I i is bill to amend i | i. nake a right. £. .";i.l _r)ns the second readingflof his p analogy between the medical tariff and the medical act, stpporting the bill in | \ the Patrons Adid Yat Lold good ; ther a speech of some The object of | I would be gome analogy if a law ere® 4 at to ®R andlog} --| the bill, he said al h t, walsl i | propasged not allowing any man to n'ac- allow rPracde i ¢ e,itO & i(t)l'lv s \ tige farming unless he 4oined the Pat-- | men i Lise their profess 0."9: h- 1 / rons. Mr. Hayootk Argued strongly an out Jét or hin< ance, They dt"'"'f'h + e& j \ bebhalf of his bM, faind concluded. by @, to sive the Y'"hlk":&-m"' t prrg: A \ seeking to move an aniendment to the _ #te on as is enjoyed by at pr & |\ amemiment to cbmmit the hbill to a sent. Under the P,f'se"t tem a medi-- snecial committee, but the Speaker rul-- . | cal examg:)atif;gég'" g'fi":ru':fi;a:rg | & qf! ;h.ih' out of nl'd;l'. , e % upon Btude | P m'e medical 'colleges . i he Pro-- l | TH®X PREMIER'S SPEECH, vince, the argument beingthet t&'e € Sir Oliver Mowat said, the bill appea Y are five competing qmedical co s & a2 i9 hj o be connl which was not in - d to him to be a,bill which was not in | ! &hbey may seek to attract students by the public interest, ang which should | lowegring the standard. But, Mr. Hay-- . minsiv oo "anoropatl y | c sot rcceive the approbation of the , | cochurged, it Wa*;'"'-\' of the Gov-- House. The medical prefession was.one erMSH to proted C publl(-'lt.svlf, and of the most impeortant of all the profeg. d » d@evolve this W-'M'S"""W' up-- sions with which _pvupl'(' had to do. ?i k ' itresponsible body of men. '?h('l'l' was a learned profession. and there E. at present, he went on, a uniform was,. he believed, no country in a24 ; |Matriculation o;:amhmtinn imposed \ll'; would where it stood pigns, t;~-ixm f: w~eoege a > Gov t hax mvince i *A j (ak.:>"" n id . Wls Mounie, Jt war on hovegit KA fiould be imposed, a professior,. and in that respect it whs, 'of ' 2l 6 fftion could be imn-- he thought, unsurpassed in any countty "'~§" stead of, as it is now, w the in the world. The bill was revolution-- t minate . ~C P3 lm'\'r s ary, and a strong case should be m& 6 C d e«*aimInnt '*8 ht hy h( out as to its necessity before the H 2 P the M Li _:.~« COciMMIGHt on | stovul© be induced to pass it. 'lw * -- P Ohder én'sterm fol-- were one or two features of it which he owe@ from $10,000 to $12,000 is paid by on airam cand Perbipy the Aicuce might :m:?dvnts each year to the Council, ,',' ','.'l,(:"ll"a?g I):?at:}s\'tl::e };;yt"itm'w'a re exs x Icrk B conclude )aAs3s iem. of this, fln:lutn?::?t:l;gigi(:?nt: "»:"tn::;ns..":):l);) the main principles of the bill which the hormaude by the council--to the medi-- }-'luns..sm)uhl. look at, He agreed wi_t{ . cal profession for this, The Law So-- "j'.'{?"'""'t'" of the bill.t}mt Spegia clety takes fees from the law students legislation and 'sp»cial- powers were git in a somewhat similar manner, but sup-- (;,n t(l' t&]:' ns]((fl:("a: gl{'()?;SSlnn h'l'?"y E'I" _the legal professic. . with reports, e ced n o. Cw o resaban mss a hl"'l'nrm(.;i ()l'hnr services, whirlp all ;',fi,;fig":,'(',ot:hu?u t:;fi.g gf'fl;:slsr:\nlmu:; medical man receives back is t j i Awo--thousandth share in ,.m'i;;'::',"'. th'c'. were used f'-'? that' purpos . Crit > > ;ble real estate venture in Toronto 'l.cw ng the bill, Sir Ollverrepiied to th-' Bay street. The $100 paid was as stat: ment that the fees paid by medi i Bystem of protection as a 25 per cal students upon entering their studie ty on cloth, and it was inter-- | were too high, Without going into th« cial, and not Dominion, as is the d tails of whether they wore or wer case with the cloth duty. not, he pointsd out that at any rate the; It was a poor comptiment to the edu-- weunt to benefit the profession, and s cational system which was said to be evoeuntually i0 the benefit of those wh! the best on earth to say that the pub-- l paid them. They did not go into som lic must be protected from the men | general fund belonging to the countr turned out from the medical colleges. _ | niur into some foreigit fund, and the:i . L aggMt. Haycock then outlined the nfliln I tody fiDD};Q[H'l:--:ttu! Dy medical" praaul 1 res Of the bill.. One feature was | :1;11\13:. The promoter of the bill ha. ition of the moedicatl court wH«-ix | ; been specially severe in his {'rltlcisr » r to bring medical \'-1""'!)4 f'"l"' t "(f"fl.\'t':lo powers which the n)"(]!('fll pro breaches' of professional eti-- | 'nn'.n-:}":* ':.'..s"('»)f' d.a'lhfg with its ow! MTte* In that _ court the same man | m ers. 1at were those powers could be plaintiff, witpess, and could | Tha fault or crime (to use the hon % almost sit on'wmm'ttnp' and be the | meimber's words) which must .b executioner also. That was an 'tmnun'l | proved before a member can be strick of . Powes »Miigh 'snould no: '"" A cen | en off the roll was somsthing tha . to.any such body of mon nn.ll\"i:'h r'(L amounts £0. A felony, someihing tha . Fard fo.therpower possessed by the t + -"":'UMS to a misdemeanor or some ie }, of depriving misdical men of t}'jd.a,l?ml amounts to infamous or dis 4 t license for unproféssional conducti rraceful conduct. Did the people of th« i.' % K8ock remarked that the ("HUI':'ii f::'""',{"'("('{; ";=1. n;tur\?tl'l""? ';,r:mu-.-ing nmn!n: 13 im cars C » e medici ofes:sin, or men guilty + e S Mn :x}::(::u l'lvr:lt'!;"-fcl'a-:'s'i«.v;v:al ot arn offence which amounts to a mis ~ ¥ before them, s that Pamcos or olegracersty" Yat imatmanl ThA e antii Lno lor. *A hll"lllhs'"' disgraceful? Yet that mus ¢ * Man is tried has been | ¢ ! .th(')"r?\"b'\r"!:;.\(; ':1 ?!!'i"'.n'l cl;"! s o Padn. e( s ' ® H14 t % recie > 'epe -- ' hs.TiT;:u:d'r; l:twt f;DDQSOG to any man torested in purging their p'rn"f\.'\',:llon'?\g chamber cougrt (r;th:'-i ?.\'::l fn "rmm' itbat kind of persons. But since 187 3. | bill were the d(;flnitinn' uft \u:m:r (.::.'-"'" oL pinn- cases out of the two or thres _ Lal conduct, details of which o cre niven | thousand medical men had been tried M # C s ave to try cases, { these > "@ n the hl u a;'lmn) from m}l\' four were convicted. and these cl:'\'i' I 'ity of mediea ap. * Mprore» Of the Habil-- , "'"' v repeated trials. And in these to two years, amdllithe plactn® . fmt;" 'mf? | T hat the evidence was so conclusive lection of the annu vew th t e cal~-- | «';-lt anly one ventured to avail himself , , Court instead of as at in the Division | of the power of appeal to a Judge of the | ' at present. | nlg'h (l mn'lf. In this case the Judge said y . :* of hy '"H oY F | 'at the offence was clearly proved aad . o es V'IUS HOIST, | he complimented the f\!m!l(!al Council P is s COBPXH tan with a general | upon the manner ia which the case had [ dunope ganecbUP Which was cm-- | been conducied. m |b@ue gep afp O1 OME that the bill | | ¢ir Oliver submitted that the whole b + 1x months' hoist. Ee (ase for the present bill broke down. ; . t 'Hay§ock Rad not made There was no ground at all for a revo-- ' cCaF 1onf n« suse.. & that the medi-- lutionary proposa!, no pretence that the j T ':7' jled three or four years power given to the meodical profession g' "AsWexcept, perhaps, in one or rad been abused or that anyone hud§ * | (1oP, matty nts, a satisfactory set-- been unfairly dealt with. There was, | | C amedical profession. The e