The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

In the House yesterday a few prirate Bills were advanced a stage: and a consid= erable proportion of the questions upo@ the order paper were disposed of. In reply to a question by Mr. Bechard, Mr, Blake stated that the Government *had i iderati * for the amendment ofthe Insolvent" Act so as to prevent official assignees from . ide their z ths 1 k Ordinary sources of income during the past few months has been such as, it is generally presumed, will demand some slight increase in tre ta.iif! \What the extent of that increase is l.keiy to be is, of course, quite unknow:râ€" Indeed, it is not known positively thst there will be aoy, although we should say it is quite likely. THE HOUSKE OF COXMONS YES TERDAY. Hon.} Mr. Cartwright will dâ€"liver his Budeget Speech this afternoon. Consider~ able interest is centred uporn his utterâ€" ances, and iderable anxiety has been displayed ut:lbo nature of the proposiâ€" tions whic he may submit. ‘ii:~ geveral expectation is that there wil e some slight rearrangement of the tarill, with a view to meet the * requiremâ€"nts of the public service. These latter rro proâ€" ‘ posed to be, according to the estimates, as we have already shjvu in thoul columns, very considerably re.iu sed, but the falling off in the recei}‘s from the i Tae statement of Revouus an l Expenâ€" diture for the last eight months was laid upon the Table of the House of Comâ€" mons by the Minister of Finance y >sterâ€" day afternoon. The stitement covers the period from Ist July, 1875, to February 10th, 1376, and sh>ws the incom> { »r that period to have been $‘2,820,783 ; e <penâ€" diture, $13,965,509 ; shoawing a dâ€"ficiency of $1,143,724. â€" SHimorized io say that not only will such costumes be admitted, bu* that all hokler s of cards who can conveniently appear in fancy costume are especially invite 1 to do so. We also take this occasion to anâ€" nounce that the rule requiring the preâ€" sentation of cards at the door will be rigidly enfo. ced. cards for the approsching ball to be given by the members of the Dominion Govern ment from the Province of Quebec have requested to be informed whether they maiy appear in fancy costume, we are suthorized to say that not only will such Vur attention has been calied to the fact that ths labouring men employe.l by the city are paid in cheques, which they are unabls to get cashed, and couse quently are compelled to undergo many privations, invoiving the lack of many real necessities. In thase exceptio rilly hard times it really seems that some measures should be adopted which would remeve the working class, wie depend upon the wages o% their daily labour for simple existence. REVENUEAND EXPENDITURE the Premier and evening. James Gornlon Bennett, of the New York Heraid, Mrs. May, Miss May, Miss C. May, Miss Bennett, Miss Queilat, Col. Schuyler Crosby, Mr. Howland, Mr. Mott, and Mr. Wright, of New York ; Hon. it. W. and Mrs. Scott, Miss Mackiem, of Torouto ; Hon. Mr. Huntington, Postmaster General; Hon, Maicoim Camer>n, M.P. ; Hon. Mr. Mitchei!. M.P.; Mr. Jones, M.P.; Mr. ‘ Thompson, M.P, Welland ; dined with We are informed that James Gordon Bennett, of the New York Heraild, toâ€" gether with the party accompanying him, intends leaving Ottawa toâ€" morrow. As several persons who have C rdâ€"Dr a Pr: udfoot Local Noticeâ€"Lecture Luach B 1 of Fareâ€"Qu> n Resaurant AThke Tines. Gerls uc â€"Chas Bry3an Hot or Cold Lungzres â€"Comme ci Chaz or Steakâ€"Com mercial Hoa Cy#ers and Were ; Ra‘ bi‘‘â€"Com Gerts 3u Lad e ‘ UTTaWA, FRIDAY, FEB. 2, 0 l=‘s an t ( Aé¥~ All konis c executed p om ptly C>:NER Or WELLINGTON & ERLGIN STREET®. is rai persons who have received the approsching ball to be giren D ADVERTI3EMENTS INSERTED LIST. THE BUDGET cuw Ad»zeritisements. A#s nrar t‘a wa. RAJOTTE‘S BLOCK, vesâ€"Chas hryâ€"on #1" PRINTER AND PUBLISHER Bryso _ _shjtu in these ssably re.luced, but » receip‘s from the income during the Mrs. Mackenzic HMtS" UFFIUt R"M~\ID To »mmercia M. BU: GESS, ioos . PROTECTION OF Lips, "P99 | > ‘Mr. COOK introduced a Bill to provide d of. In | means of escape for persons falling into hard, Mr , thbmhuwvidmtyot wharves and S nling | ~Tes Sill nis read tas is tuke. I'“m"' :: mfi-.' g;.. TUPPu’th is the j the non, member want to nees from establish a swimming school ? J districts, ‘ Xr.woxfldnllliflhrfiofifi w Bock Priiting reiai ‘10u e 1876 4eÂ¥ 6tf | _ Hon. Mr. CARTWRIGHT asked for _| explanations as to the object of this bill, and how far it effected the rights of | private individuals or banks. [ _ Hon J. H. CAMERONâ€"As it is naow, | the banks frequently have great difficulty in reference to bills and cheques which |are made payable to order. 1 do not propose to extend the law to the same extent that it is in England, but to contine im, to questions of order, and to £ ide that whenever a cheque or draft made payable to order ou the bank, that either the payee or maker may cross the cheque or drsft and make it payable to any other incorporated bank, and that then it shail only be payable to the last named b=nk. Mr. SP«AKERâ€"The strict rule, of course, would require that such a measure as this should originate by resolution in committee. Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE said the rule had not been enforced. . C The Bill was read the first time. EXAMINATION OF EXGINEERS. Mr. COOK introduced a Bill to provide for the examination and licensing of gnh sons employed . as engineers elsewhere than on steamboats. Ehe Bill was read the first time. : NC IX tHIs __Hon. J. H. CaME] bill to amend the law and Banking. presenting reports had pas 200 SRA OOCC SR m WOmT VP UCP ter to leave it until a little later, when the Chairman of the Committeo was present, i __Â¥lr_MASSON explained that his reason _ dlr MASSON explain for bringing it up was F 1he. House then adjourned motion of Hon. Mr. Blake. at 6 c M e uc k ces the Speaker said that tie debate had got exceeding.y irrelevant, and called on members to speak to the motion, wfiih was then declared carried. <Hon. s Cartwright laid on the table the stateâ€" ment cf expenditure and receipts up| to 10th February, and stated that if no A dent intervened be would bring downYe‘ annual financial statement this afi ipâ€"| the of a tax upon all the produce coming from the United States into Uanada would not force them to give us reciprocity. They were an exporting country. Mr. Bowell would favour reciprocity, but failing that he would have a reciprocity in rotection, which was the best cou:iunorcmf policy for & country like Canada. After remarks (:)m Hon. Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Young, Sha MAE OO CCE TT un SSE in regard to some commercial theories, and he bad no doubt he would te an ally again, when he would certainly utilize himâ€"a sentiment which â€" was loudly cheered from the Ministerial benches. in concluding his remarks, the Premier stated that the Government would cerâ€" tainly do all they could do to foster the coal trade both in Nova Scotia and elso where, but he was not prepared then to say what the Government policy might be Mr. Oliver followed, and said the levying of a tax uon all tha nradinaa anmins fias | Third Parli unent DOMINION LEG!ISLATURE } Mr. Cimon having asked whether it was the intention of the Government to have a steam fog whistle placed on Lark Point (Isle aux Morts) at the mouth of the Naguenay, in connection with the light house there, Mr. Mackenzie replied that they had no intention of doing so at present. Mr. Cimon also asked why the contract for building two Beacon Lights at the entrance of the River Saguenay was given to Ambroise Trudelle for $900, while tenders had been received for the work from Louis Lavoie, Murray Bay, for $1490; Joseph Tremblay, thicoutimi, for $500; Joseph Warren, Muarray Bay, for ‘ Tarliymentâ€"Third Session. HO! SE OF COMMONs. H. CaAMERUN introdused a n_adjourned, on +J . Blake, at 6 o‘clock. Tavasoay, Feb. 2 rehtinE to Banks that the time for yasl AlticteGhant uis Smd c» 8 w u2e nd | as 23,000 bands employed in connection with this shipping; and taking in 2t | consideration that in 187 was & | much as $123,000 expe thly i et | the payment of different ployed: en | in and about the mmeo‘uthu ouse will‘ 4s | come to the conclusion that these interests deserve some consideration at our hands. on | he extent of the coal fields of Nova or | Nootim is very great. By reference to works published on this question, it will a | be seen that the largest available deposits zs | of coal in Canada exist in Nova Scotia., 1t is true that there are some deposits in or | the Northwest, but it is not known whe 1, | ther they are of the quality to make them of | serviceable or not. 1t is well known that there is coal in the Province of British z, | Columbia, out it is so far west th .t it never y | can be of any possible value to the h | Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, or the 4| Maritime Provinces, and there is no e | possibility of a coal trade arising between e | that Provincée and the Kast. This being g | the case, I think this House should take ; | into consideration the position 0. the , | Dominion.. with ‘ reference to â€" an s | article of "such importance. | The great | p Pro:l'moo of Untario is entirely c}oâ€" | ; | pendent u, a foreign country for | , | every tonp‘:? coal consumed in it. P All their manulfactories driven by steam 1 f| are entirely doflendent. upon the United | States for their fuel, and any civil comâ€" / , $ motionthumightubplwoh that Reâ€" public might have the effect of closing | , | down all these factories and raising the | ; price of coal in Ontario to famine prices. | j Therefore there is only one place where F Quebec and Ontario can depend on, un S der any degree of cer tainty, tor their coal sl supply, and> that is Movea Scotia. It | 4 seems to me, in so far as a tariff of duties l is concerned, the position we stand in is a 0 very humi g one. . Uur neighbors ag seem to think can take everything | p from us and g 6 us nothing in return., to Tuey seem to imposa duties on in everything we send to them, and with | .. reference to ourt country they adopt the > ;:rnnuq. © cannot send a ton of con to the Uni btates without havi lin ts lw'- Bnrywnofw s pcm ) to that county has to | pet pay, before it is taken from the vessel * / wih; placed on the wharf, a duty of T5 cents, nÂ¥ PEEERDOMAT mar YSuth AlrG++nctircht Arssuc in a few days the Indiang‘ Bill will be brought down, ard their policy will be fully developed. | Mr. McKrAY (Cape Breton) moved for| & return of. the number of tons of coal imported into Canada during the past year from the United States, and for corâ€" respondencte between the Government of Canada and the United States relative to duty. He sad â€""In comection with this motion, I beg leave to say a few words, inasmuch &4 I consider that it has referâ€" ence to one of the most important indus tries in the Dominion of Canada,. »I have not yet heard anything said with reference f &othoswjngmures'd f u&fmthonvlnuo! | ova i4, and if anythi respecting it fl.. been uttered ithnnot.‘boendoh::ig 1' the forcible manner which its importance requires. When you take into considera | tion that there is as hrm sum , as | twelve millions of do capital | invested ‘in the Province of Nova | Sceotia coal trade, and that there |â€" are 500,000 tons of shipping annually | engaged in the carrying otf coal â€"from the | Province to other parts of Canada, and to | foreign countries; that there are as many [ se @4 en id og 22 RL 24 Hon. Mr. LALRD H’ffx;ipnfioulsr sub; ject of the hon. member‘s question is under the considetation of the Government, and Mr. CUNNINGHAM asked whether it is the intention of the Government to amend the Act passed in 1874, intituled ""An Act to amend certain laws respecting Indians and the extension of the same to the Provinces of Manitoba and British Columbia,‘" so as to confer on ‘convicti Magistrates the power to give tonll:g‘ sons convicted under that Act hard labot &3 & part of their sentence ? ‘ Hon. MF.ILAIRD / The nawkilanles srl © 1k Pul C PP CC PPYCTZ TR E3 UOW~ ever, it is‘ the desire otybon. mo’mben from Untario and Quebec it can be introâ€" duced again. + to me, in so far as a tar cerned, ue position we s hu g one. . uur to think can take . us and give us nothing eem incly dh impose hing weisend to the 10e to corlairy ined Hon. Mr. SMiTH â€"It is not the intenâ€" tion of the Gorernment to introduce a measure| on the. subject this session. Both last session and the session before m bill ~was introduced on this subject. There was a good deal of o{lpoail.ion to it, both from Untario atd Quebec, and we did not press it. If, howâ€" Mr. WOOD asked whether it is the inâ€" tention of the Government to introduce a Bill to compel masters and maes of ves: sels navigating the inland waters of the Dominion to procure certificates of comâ€" petency before taking command ? hon. member requires will be furnished by the Governmeat when they reach that vote in the estrmates. EOE C lt Airre taionlt nth sls flce h s the House to vote the same sum as last year. Any further information that the tHion. Mr. VAILâ€"If the hon. meniber will examine the estimates he will seb it i.{ "h:} intention of the Government ta ask Mr. TH ‘MPSUN (Haldimand), asked whether it is the intention of the Governâ€" ment to continue the Penliom given to the Veterans of 181214, and whether they propose to increase the amount awarded to each person, and to what amount ? i j1°. 2y 2 ) O3 " j 36. )6 asked, nor is it.reguâ€" lar they should be put in that manner, I can ohly answer him by saying that the Government have taken such staps as they conceived tobclml:fitfijudio.oui for this purpose. That will e proper way to u‘::nin what steps have been taken, but it is quite impossible for me to make mention of what the steps are. | Hon. Mr, MACKENZIEâ€"The hon gentleman has put bis question in such a way t at I would require to m§ke a speech of eonsidombmenxth in order to answer it 1t is not convenient that Richelieu River, Lake Champlain, Chamâ€" plain Canal and Hudson River, and pla cing them on the same footing as Ameriâ€" can barges navigating our rivers? | | . Hon. Mr. SMITHâ€"It is not the intenâ€" | tion of the Government to erect a fog | whistle there. Mr. CIMON asked why the oon%let for building two beacon lights at the enttrance of the fiiver Saguenay was given to Amâ€" | broise Trudelle for $900, whileâ€"tenders \had been received for: the k from \Louis Levoie, Murry Bay, for :EO Jos. |Tremblay, Chicoutimi, for $500; Joseph \Warren, Murray Bay, for $590; Joseph Warren, Murray Bay, for $600. Honw, Mr. SMITHâ€"The reason, why Laâ€" ‘vo‘e‘s tender was not accepted is t?at it was received too late. The tenders were opened on the 20th of February. His: tender was not received until the 23d ; Tremblay‘s was not received until the 2ith; Warren had two tenders We accepted the one for $390, and ‘notified him accordingly, but he refused * take it. The next lowest was Trude ‘s, for £990, and he took the contract dnd has finished it. . Mr. CUTHBERT asked whether the Govâ€" ernment are taking any, and if sq, what steps tpwards removing the obstructions now placed in the way of Canadian ships | and barges, or Canadian Forwarding Comâ€" panies‘ boats passing from any port in |. Canada to New York, and back is the Richelieu River. Lake Chamniain Mhaw.| n ooo en oo o en e oc I do not know whether this suggestion will be acted on in the manner indicated or not. MBCIMON asked whether it is the intenâ€" tion of th@ Government to have a " Steam Fog Whistle" placed on Lark Point {Isle aux Morts) at the mouth of the Baguen wy, izl:l conmection with the Light House there ? / hi beén introduced by him Jast session, @id hby| consent was withdrawn, but he | | meant to have it J)uud this tim:.o&'l‘ho i lea to provide ladders agn dooks, to enable persons fdlin% off t.:fi:ng on to them wntil they could be ued. At Coilingwood twelve lives had been lon} | all of which might have been saved, i | -uol!:n of escape had been provided In Toronto and other places many persons [lndboo drowned in the samé way. Mr, BECHARD asked whether it is intention of the Government to amend the the Insolvent Act in such a manner as to rrovide that the Official Assignees be no onger permitted to act outside their' respective Districts ? * Hon. Mr. BLAKE I stated ‘in answer to a question the other day that the Govâ€" | ernment have under cousideration several, | suggestions with reference to the amendâ€" | ment of the Insolvent Aoct, but have not | : 'srr‘ivod at any conclusion on any of them, | THE TIMES, OTTAWA, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1876 P IEV DT AOPOT ie t tssz tRA Fetase Couss ‘“ufl'd * 20 |statement otthtkindnuudo.th. House Dr. T r ©02l |should be. placed in possession of the Syduey &. . 1t | authority on which it reats, L think the | py uy ; duties | hoy, gentleman is vyery much mistaken. Hog, in is & Ohbnehrtrooocmonqgomnthreoye,g' sloms hbors | ago, when . coal was costing at the pit‘s f:’ whit thing | mouth, $3.50 0 per ton, and when freights | y p22"%, AUmmâ€"| to the United â€"States were,: in | 8000 | whay a p °8 9n | instances, as , high as $5, 1 think the exâ€" | "7V With | periment was tried of sending coals to unom t the Toronto, and it'ufquudwo,mld.m his ~ opin. on of | compete with our neighbours across the orenia Iving linni}.)‘ But the. hon. gentieman has not & Hon. 3 2,000 m,ntionedumfilmunw% thing of ie mg es "r’s"!&'r‘“&‘.'i,’%‘.nmlmm' L o¢ 3 s onts, '.:2‘?..;‘1‘..".‘?. in Nove Scotia for $#2 and | the gentle |_ _ Mr. MoKAY+â€"L understood. the Hox. | member for Pictou to state that he deems it almost impossible to organize a trade ~| between NovaScotia and Untario, which | would be mutually beneficial.. When a. statement of minghmthoflo‘n;o should be. p possession of the Authority on .which it rests. I think the hou. â€" gentleman is very much mistaken. On one or t #o occasions, some three years ago, when..coal was costing at the pit‘s mouth, .3.50”&»: ton, and when freights to the United .States . were,. in some instances,.as , high as $5,â€"1 think the exâ€" periment was tried of; sending coals to Foronto, and it was found we, could : not compete with our neighbours across the unfi But th‘-ht. Mlm.v-mflom has not wentioned " h geeut difterence | s Exslgâ€"ret] which cost $3.75 a * be fi:hnd in Nova Scotia for $2 and | (Mr. COURIERâ€"There is one my | hon. friend from Pic.ou is mmmt [â€"itho coal used for steam purposes. 1 know of no steamboats or stationary engines which use soft coal. At any rate, anthracite isâ€" always used in this part of the country. For heating our houses and g;ollinp anthracite is altogether; em yed. Mr. CARMICHAELâ€"The more runnl why anthracite should be included. | Hon. Mr. CARTWRIGAT said tliat "the Customs returns don‘t discriminate beâ€" ”Ie{"n.g:.'l?gfiéthou'ght it you e / Hon. Dr. TUP it very deâ€" lg‘tglouul the Customs returns . should POVE buiratriaintnsnt hh drccat sc d1 1 1 2c 80 discriminate, and be was satisfied that this could be easily accomplished. It was only â€"necessary to have a single word in the entries. ;5;&:-‘ ast him in his own county, where the <ry was, "Protect our industries ;" and it Loul‘.l be stated that a man from Pictou, ‘epresenting the coal int.omh‘mv opâ€" &nd to protective dutles. Nevertheless ie was siepreed ty sepiain only lor Gpuaee ie was di to explain only his t convictious. He had l::o doubt that it was il: the linterut of the wholllok DO‘qu:: toâ€" etrongly resist anything like the begin« ning of & false protective policy. _ _ hneard so much aboat Protection meant taxation, and by adopting such a s tem the cost of living would beinm-ci'ond the cost of producing coal would be conâ€" sequently augmented. The sentiments be rI:mi given utterance to might be . used SW eb s 2w1 © as to induce them to lower their duty, We had. far better show that we have a more correct idea of the true principles of ‘trade, and follow the example of the \Mother mntry in such matters. The true me to promote the mining and other interests of Nova Scotia is to refuse to inaugurate this protective policy we heard so nmuch abont â€"~ Protaatinnâ€"Auzshny | | ha se~ ul c3r) ) . _ CAPARIAOR O & mtiuwuld be a retaliation against Great Britain, It might shut out a few tons that come into guoboc, and as â€" far as Montreal, but no reasonable person can expect that , we can successfully carry eoals to Untaric, Such being the ‘case,â€" the result. of the duty will be to tax the people who pur» chase the coal, . It is impossible that it could .egect the Americans to that extent Cep o o e mm tg- u-v‘:&r‘u B AC+ taliatory policy wwud.‘ United States. ? The remarks of the hon. member for Cape Breton implied that if you give us a tax on coal you :must give the farmers of Ontario a tax on. food, and would the effect be on Nova Scotia? It might beneft the coal interests, but would. work to the: general injury of the Province. . The reâ€" sult also of the imposition of a duty would ’ Mr. JONES asked the hon. member whether the bituminous coal is used &At all in this country for manulacturing.: purâ€" purposes. _ j * Mr. CARMICHAEL was very certain that it was largely used. This coal was surely more extensively used for produc. ing steam more than the antbracite ; at firely: "Ghebes is the imrgons macint in sively, Que t or Novs. Bcotis coal; and there it m‘ bu'.jned on steamboats. He favoured areâ€" to reduce the duty on Canadian coal. Althought we are not entirely dependent on the action of that Governmentâ€"it is much to be desired that a reduction. be n;ulo infu‘;: duties now : levied. â€"â€"â€"Lhe acing 0 ty‘on American coa‘ would â€" fx)ot hasvo the effect of excluding it trom our market, unlessâ€" it â€"be levied not on : bituminous coal but anthracite. ‘A Mr. JONES, No! f Mr. CARMICHAELâ€"We see the poâ€"| sition in which ‘strong protectionists | place themselves when it comes to the t pract:cal poiut of imposing duties. «The y anlose ioi on Sanmabiee ( a duty on an ite, i dn we do not produce. The manufacturers : of Quebec and Ontario d=mand protection, b but when it comes to additional taxation j on them, for we all know to what extent I coal is used in manufactures. Mr.CARMICHAEL seconded the moâ€" tion of the hon. member for Cape. Beton. Although fully impressed with the imâ€" portance of the question he could not entirely: commit. himself to the views ex: preluedb?y the hon. membor.u' His prinâ€" ciple dbject in secondin ing this motion was to ascertain whether any and what steps had been taken by the Administraâ€" tion to induce the American Government Mr. J JNES agreed in the main with the remarks of the hon. member for Cape Bretou, but took exception to one or two points. He hoped to see trade between easitarn and western fir:vinm fostered as much as possible. would also have a du.y imposed on certain qualiâ€" ties of coal coming=into. Canadaâ€"that mined in Nova~Scotiaâ€"but duty should pot be levied on coal we do not possess, ‘fioo was of opinion that 75 per cent.;of the article used in Untario is Lehigh, anthracite, ,and hard coal employed in blasting, furnaces and factories, and this sort is not mined in Nova Scotia. The hou. member in nami for the return should have it so fnm:fu to show what quantity of bituminous, anthracits coal is â€" brought into Ontario from the United States. ) d»|] inces that . fall vex lightly _ upon is | Ontario. I do not s â€"in this way for the gurpou of cm&g sectional feeling ; is | My intention is quite the reverse; my e | object is dm%ly to induce this House to 0 | understand that unless we have certain o | trade interests protected; unless the ir’ East can trade with the West and exâ€" change their commodities, I do not think r | this Confederation can hold together, ~ It ‘â€" | geems to me that the basis of remaining 1,| in the position which we now hold, is that â€" |gach part of the Dominion must give t nomctgi.nrg towards the other; that each . | must take into consideration the interests i | of the other, for the purpose of fostering | | tride between the Epnt and West. We in the meantime should be given to unâ€" . â€" | derstand that the great .Brovinoe of i | Ontario will show some consideration to > | the little Province of Nova Scotia. I do | | not think that the imposition of a duty |on: United States coals would fall so heavily on the people of Ontario as some | people consider it would be; at the same |time I think, in the interests of the Dominion, the duty should be imâ€" | posed, as it would create a traffic between the Maritime Provinces and the West _ that does not now â€" exist. Nova Scotia, with its 400,000 poorlo. imâ€" ported from the United States $19418,389 â€" io val:e of breadstuifs during the past â€" year. _ The trade represented by these , tigures ought to have been transacted with : Untario, which could exchange flour for | coals, Nova Scotia is almost anounâ€"pro~ | ducing country so far as breadstulfs are ! concerned. During the t yoar New | Brunswick has xmp‘orwf“ 3nfi: to the 4 value of $682,142, and ‘Prince Edward | island $55,452, so tnat here is a market t for Ontario‘‘ The hon.gentleman conâ€" J timued to say that previous experience $ showed that we lwg aothing to expect & from the American Government, which 9 would probably next levy duty on fish & narrels. The question was most imporâ€" t tant to the people of Nova Scotia, who~ © awaited mxmusf m solution of it. Ho hoped tha\ thojovemnunt would take * steps to cause the duties imgbo:od by the United States on our coals to removed,. T or to levy equal duty on American coal. _ D while we admit the very same article free. The Province of Ontario, being almost en tirely dependent upon the United States for coal, it will be said by the people it is not right to tax their fuel, butI wish them to ‘understand, that as the tariff now is a number of the duties fall very heavily upon the Maritime Provâ€" in | ‘"8" was very certain 1. This coal was | !P* used for producâ€" m“"m‘“ he antbracite ; at s {: is used cx::n '°“'.y“. t market for n mmat on |foy e fa areâ€" ‘ * United States. | D7," in manikhas f2. + â€" _ _ ECDIVHS provailed with the late Government to adopt it. Hon. Mr. TUPPERâ€"1 never said any. thing of ~the kind, luid,dontb et:,n trary, it was tqo support, volunteered y m.'onflomn on tmothnid.o( the a member of the late A« his â€" opinions â€" prevailed Government to adopt it. Mr, DYMOND expliined that he had testified only to what he haa seen. Dr. l'UPk{EB repeated that coal from Sydney and Spring Hill is not exoslled by any in the United States. w Hon. ‘Mr MACKENZIEâ€"The hon. rn:lemm s that he was an advocate or 'hnthomtmfiomlpol‘wy although he has never yet developed his ideas of :dhn & na:‘lo&d policy is. Bu:‘h_o was “J w ig e i Advocate of this policy before he became. hado n s y e o n e en ing flour down and bri coals fiom have the olfoctb:?‘ir:gnemz ight. F be attained. ‘The protection to flour from the great Province of Ontario would fully counterbalance all they would lose by the duty on coal. The traie which guldjdlo: uu‘ ado ption of this policy O ons oe o0 00 0C Om e mt to 750 per ton. There was also an immeâ€" diate reduction of duty on ~potatoes and several kinds of lumber, and though the policy was in force but one year, Canada has reaped the benefit 0f it ever. since. The result was to stimulate the coal trade in Nova Sootia, and the com tition:engendered by the investment of :l‘,(XX),OOO in that interest, had the effect ol bringing down pricesin this country. The arguments of the hon member for: Pictouâ€"»re suicidal. I give him credit for earnestness, because he knows they ,must be distasteful: to his constituents, but_he forgets the results which will follow the adoption of such . a policy * as has been : proposed. Two objects would hie\ \ o tkes t ind oA o oo Ec B 1CY CSEW! ie irionbtitt o6 0 ons x‘ fltns aves Di 1A d cannot afford to excite the hostility of the United States, it will be fraught with dinger and disaster." â€" That was oné of the objections, â€" Another was that it would have the effect of very largely raising the prices of some . of these articlesâ€"coal for instance ~without giving any benefit whatever to the country. which produced them. Tae experiment was tried for a single pear, and as every person who has paid attention to the subâ€" ject knows, there never. was a time in Canada whenâ€"coal was cheaper in Quebec and Montreal â€" than during that |. gonod. What was the effact in the United States? Was there exasporation, excitement, or any stumlpt to injure us? No; the naâ€" tural result gollowed. No somner had we imposed a duty of 50 cents per ton on coal than the duty on the same article in the_,Unit.ed States was reduced from $1.25 2. s9g _ _ " _ _ DAHEDENP W 6 4 EVIRCC C O emeereey Tvry TouP lied to abantion it, owing to the bad lf:hh of the hon. gentleman who had bsen loudest in urging 1t upon them. Although it was only a year on the statute book, it was long enough in existence to dissipate the _ obligations: . that â€" had _ been raised against it. â€" When it was prt:g:od to adopt a policy by which we ld have, if not free trade, & mfio:ity in tariffsâ€"a policy. that would: have, more than anything else could do, ltro.:fithonod ‘ th: free trade party in the United States â€"how were we niet by the hon. gentlemen on the opposite of the House, now sitting on the Treasury Benches ? They said, "We LE ulp 5 29e she Pn a%el s Conatien, that ‘. policy, . and a‘ter they were comm tted .to i; not only . voted againet it, but )omoa his party in endeayâ€" ouring to obstruct us in every possible way. Under these circumstances the Government were placed in ’lrfinfion of very great embarrassment. majority by which they were enabled to carry this pol:;s‘thq .fl::qlnul one, only seven or t. ‘A ayear‘s experience some of the gentlemen who had previously supported the policy ubjected to its conâ€" tinuance, and the Government were comâ€" s _ Hon. Mr. TUPPERâ€"I had not intended s to speak on this question,but I feel called , upon to make some remarks in reply to ; the allusion which has been mbdoiy the , hon. Tlember forHNor;: York to the natiohal policy.. He hatically 4 . condemned it not only onih:;l:nnt but _ on former . accasions.. After a . very. . general expression of opinion on both . sides of the House in favour of meeting. , the probibitory tariff of the United States ,upon articles the growth and mu . of Canada by a similar tariff, the rnâ€" ment of which I bad not then the honâ€" _ our to be a member, introduced their . policy, imposing a duty of 50 cents per ton on coal, and a duty upon salt, grain and severil other articleg. 1t is true tnat duty was subsequently abandoned. _ Al» though a number of â€"Fon. fionthnen, among them my friend from North Oxâ€" ford and Mr. McGill, who was then memâ€" _z:r for Hamilton, and who, L am happy o “'*anflf i :dere the loudest ndvm“ il:hf:von-f‘:' ; adopting a policy when they found the Government were ldispooqd to _ meet their patriotic ’doolmfiouinfnvonr.lm'ofqrudhtoq ?golicyinrofomoolo&o United States, | ut a reciprocity tariff, then they formed | & eombin;tion to embarrass the Governâ€" ment and prevent them from carrying | ; out the very views they had themselves | ’expnuoed.‘ There was one honourable | ; exception to this â€"Mr. C.mmf South | Huron. Iwill do him the to say | 4 he rsiludsflmnduoflonoaflnt 1 occasion, and re to abandon or obâ€" | { ltm.:: & (t)havernml::. that golc‘l.d consented | , to adopt the policy he ur upon them. | ; The hon. member for Southâ€"Oxford, after | , ulx:gin‘ |tho + Government â€" to adopt | ; a is 0 2 ds 1 s n oo fropond would fall most hnvildy, but 1e would haye been aw unjust and disâ€" bonouravie man‘if he had ever voted for that coal tax, : * be a tax of a imost iniquitous nature, which would fall only on a portion of the community. . Where our manufacturers were, and where our ponulation is densest and poorest, there it was that the tax Spsarmas s LE3 OR oo e Mr. DYMOND said the coal which rea hed Toronto from~ Nova Scotia was not of the kind required there. The practical experience gained under the national policy of taxing the coal imâ€" ported into Ontario® was against the proposal of the hon. member. It would. remarks of the hon. member for Pictou. this season have ranged from $1 to $2, but put on $1,25 for freight to my"g:r- tion of Ontario on the Lakes, and e with cartage, brings the coal up to above $6 per ton. _ Ifit be true as iut-'dâ€"md a member of this House who is a coal owner now in the United States is my authorityâ€"that coal ‘is delivered on Deâ€" troit River at $3.50, so how is it possible to: carry coal from Nova Scotia. \ the price of coal.has been very niuch reduced. That is very true. Coal sold at Pictou this season at $1.10 per tong the common price, indeed, was $2.20 The very lowest freigbhts this year, and every person is aware they were much depressed, was $2. That makes $4.10 for the oodhwithont insurance "or "other charges, delivered in Montreal Now, 1. have been told that the Grand Trunk has, made contracts for coal delivered in Deâ€" troit for $3.50. _ A gentleman acquainted !113: the subject informs me that freights a C e s t ociccd rag 4 PÂ¥ ds\ ias Jless per ton ; and‘ I contend that if we House can send a very lnr‘r quantity to the Proâ€"* adopt vince of Quebec â€"if we can send as far HPon‘ west as the City of Montreal, and can teer i compete with the United States there, speach | our tenders are received z the Gumi tgou.h Trunk: Railway, to the exel of those â€"he wa of the United States, I contend that we cured t can send as far as Toronto, if not further,: Maritin were some little â€" inducement beld a duty out to us. It might be unwise| of )nta to suggest â€"‘that a duty could be | Ministe placed on every ton of . coal sent| abolish to Onuria:m if a trade was established | _ Hon, between the Provinces that tax could be | man sa returned. I am satisfied that the poorlo non. gei of Nova Scotia would be perfectly will 0¢ | will &'d to have a tax upon the flour, which is now | tion was imported from the United States, as a reâ€" | of the d ‘turn. I represent & constituency that | I was a | would comgxly ngree t such an arrange~ | own frie _ ment, and I will say further that the con= ‘Qflljf in stituency the hon. ‘onuon:fin represents | united s fools precisely as I do on the subject,.. I retain t doubt very much if the hon. gentieman | and whe . would fser{ufe in expressing the sentiâ€" | the hon, ments in his county that he has uttered in the Adm this House. ber sup Mr. CARMICHAELâ€"The hon. gent‘e: | â€" How. 4 man for Csape Breton said I gave no tleman v grounds for stating that coal can not be motion « carried to Ontario. I thought the reason duties. was obvious to every member. ror inâ€"| that t stance, my hou. friend has stated that | malonrity Mr. MoGREGOR heartily endorsed the late Admunistration that » â€" MaMBIIN _1. .. __G31__ _ _~7~ | SUvoosLe : TOr tpmm . for anything . dl(cGfll.d'hz‘:nI- then 26py | except for a few articles on which he milton, and wi ; 1 am happy | e wmmmww no.longer a seat in this. House, | and. local exohement in same" ohol udest advocates in favour of Tae hon. tieman did not pro, i & a policy of ~that < kind, fixed polgou hh’l'h,mbut found the Government were "hm'orhoilpw 10 digoues mt to â€"â€" meek : ‘their _ patriotic | ters ‘â€" of trade poliov. _ I ahall _ nz Tin Pn omadtne canly 10 e se T ue S PP c L hnd cunÂ¥ henest a cal "PCUEOT > ~Dot withou «ny beneat, &A.. @li...Aiter ¢ ’ ntarldyowm%;m‘:n"‘l‘.::? tore! to my asuai state neatih, Please giv it its puosicl y for he benefit of those may thus be afflicied. 1 am. Sir, yours < duseass, A4, oo bropricioncal 4 MeJallists and Jur: THOMAS MORSON & son T oi ro brPenir in d o PP P ntinit . hududl ibroughrat the world PEP3INEâ€"The popular an 1 protessional mediâ€" cilne for ‘ndigzestin is Morso«‘s Paepsing th> act v> :r‘l«plonube u~tr:odm Bold in Po der, 1 0z ' [ w one mictboiies. = 0 ~° 4 ouwnom’un is of such ce ebrity that ‘t can sc arcely e so nsl le"ed a spacialuv in com p mwgnm 1o pra tl. g.ow-. a!.nyu uo'(&nlv'r\dyno n n a rem: smeue io sz Monsor $ oz., 1} oz , and 3 oz. botties QPI.A‘.I'RVI;’I&: purest preopuratinn is Morâ€" Carefully packe t and shippe 1. â€" Orders made® payable lg mpgland" de Ars e es‘ . 1 Marson‘s Vill=ge of New Edinburzb, in the County: 0: Culetou." Province of Quebec. â€" > In the matter of NEIL MsOAUL, Notlce is hereby gi that. IAMM- wlld'“b‘y' on ven vinu-dthopowegv-w in meas Assiznes of the Estate and Effects of the above named Ia~ solvent, I will offer for sal~ byâ€"Pablic Auction at the auction roomsof Messra. Rowe 4 Eftratt, in the Clvg of Jttawa,. n the Noi~nty of Carleâ€" ton, on SATURDAY, u{: Fifteenth cay of A pril, l;':gmo’clo:k in “' afternoon, a:.l‘ t,.’ho Estate, aterest and equity . eâ€" demption of "the abore hs, ed Lusolyont and or :'S-x'l;'xf;'m. of l::ahthu i-nh?h .-nnnud t m’ :’ Lot numb«r Six, in alock number !Imon the south side of R‘dean #treet, ou w 18 aracted a dweiling house, in the said vlu-io of . New @dinvurgh, being aixty feet in fâ€"on! by g:: hln:rrnd.fn::‘a"‘?..:;"hl: down upon j ".“ M + o © 'flhbm {Mmru} én Huae nq,m'r'y ufilee of the said cunty of Ca ‘mD. +. Fastwo ‘Dh | Datad at MHtawa x Oficiai Assignes, . | RUSSELL SQUARE, LONDOX * T OTHCL Hon. Dr. TUPPERâ€"L |must interrupt my hon. friend, and ask, on what authorâ€" ity he ‘says that the m“.nnbr for Cumberland used any i to secure the omifsion of wheat foom the list. I have no hesitation in saying: that ‘the statement is entirely unfounded. After some further discussion in which Messrs. Oliver, Jones, Bowell, Young and â€" Mitchell tosk part, the. motion Hon. Mr. CARTWRIGHT laid ‘on the table‘ the statement of revenuse ‘and exâ€" penditure up to the 10th inst. ‘Amen piace,. 1t was altered ut the instiâ€" fiiml;fhnhu.-mfa Cumber. d. Nowloomidu,th’tlfm protect at allâ€"â€" f 31, & & 121 SOUTHAMPTON Row. this House who is able to. &opmd a trade policy of any kind will : not find the hon. member for Cumberland at some time or other as an ofhis. With ‘mrdtothomofionbe the House, it ill be interesting to the vamous classes of coal, and the amounts that came into the country, and it will be an interesting question to know how far any legislation we can adopt in this country is to effect the coal imports upon salt and coal ; mdl-upportoditundthuooum itwouldhlneontinmd, not a change taken place. 1t was altered at the inst‘â€" The House adjourned at 6 o‘clock. ASOLYENTACT OF 1873 fi:opued to meet him and take ue with him if I object to the course he pursues, I have sometimes been able to boast of the hon. gentle man u“:: I.ll:y in qug'-lionlh of tr:do policy, ope to utilize him yet in that charaâ€"ter, but 1 do him the justice 2_-01;_‘!:“ theseig not a gentleman in. ouenny ripistatomiee 23 °94 wsustih aindmacalthâ€"s s3 2. Tae hon. tieman did not propound a fixed Pdgon -tt‘:i upm., bat whenever he is prepared to discuss maitâ€" ters of trade ‘policy | I shall be 1 have heard go hon. gentleman a~ a fierce advocate protection, but I defy any person who has listened to him toâ€" dayorltlnfyoworfim to say he‘ is an advocate for fproucunn . for auything except for a few articles on which he etpects to make somae malitiaal aanital METPRRDGIA abior n picn drruivectincame \vcccucsd freightâ€"he may take it in nzmvuy he pleases. Itis not my intention to say auything on the general policy indicated by the hon. gentlieman accasionally. on one side and occasionally on the â€"other. I have heard the hoh santlaman 1. 2 IEO hon. mthm“ n _ knows "â€"t:é’i t â€"â€" cannot a duty on sait whonmhnmtr:dmhm‘ 8 salt wells in the world, and we are able to produce at one dollar or a dollar and a half per barrelâ€"a better article than they charge two dollars per ton for in M chi gan. It is so pre teroultougthtttho salt inlomflmmn fostered by protecâ€" fion,th:sh:smnmsl‘oauthon.M~‘ man at this peaiod of our hi making such a remark. Wehowvo:;?uu m‘ a great deal of the flonrippon.dinto“ Halifax, 8St. John and Other ,parts of the Maratime Provinces is imported as return 5"'“?" flro?tho ”lt: of Boston, New ork an vessels other produ:u.t:d'thm, plpmh,mmufm simply to make these e pay more for meoh aout oe" Soe Leopie par more for / Nee 2 cvir Pipae sheistct s ind mm:l the fnrr::en oéo Ontario by im:â€" & duty on forâ€"i ur coming into the country, beosunl‘:lvhu governs the flonr maket is not the price in Canada but the price in the Euromn markets ; and what governs every kind ::rfldn going to Europe is the Europsan ts. It is amere matter of convenience to the mmuho‘tnnr_-‘ to hayo a duty imposed on 3 239. 00030000 AOC Relenal uP uEs ticle, and all my hon. friend said was that a bad article from a Nova Sootia mine reached Toronto, although it m;‘y not have been the fault of the mine. everâ€" theless, it is perfectly clear that it is imâ€" possible to impose any duty less than two or three dollars per ton, which will force the coal of Nova Scotia to the Uptrr Provinces ; :nd' it is equally impossible Sow dn n n d ie t e d o c t e $ . , .\ y _i "RHY. ine hon. gentleman from Cumberland is not quite fair in his remarks toward. the hon. member for North York. He knows very well that my hon. friend did not denounce the Nova minz inolndifi those ‘of Nova Scotia, has .I ) a‘ 1 as well as a good &Pâ€" tinla and a We 3c 25. "aek L F_ Qusies, Th Administration _ at that _ time ..oonmlndod- @&% lar n:alority of . this House â€" but t!‘:: influence of my friend, the â€" member from North Oxfo dxlnd the member for Hamilton, omo«i im to abandon the pole n orgioh y hon. f’.i;"?nu“!d‘ohu: was y patriotic, an theâ€"interes of ‘&r.mm. Th C Dravin > C remesdd uic 1c Hon. Mr. MACKENZIEâ€" tleman will find that they motion ‘of this House to duties. Tok .. â€"â€"Achintac I was a . .,.0% . ~ C dOvernment of *which I was a member, and anumber of their own{riondo,‘voud to put all these toâ€" gether in the resolution, so as to have the united strength of allâ€" interests in order to retain that policy on the ‘statute book ; and when the motion was thus amended, the hon. gentleman will find that 1 and the Admmtnum of which I was a mem:â€" ber oupfirud it. P . Hon. Mr. MACKENZIRâ€"Tha kan 2. Hon. Mr, MACKENZIREâ€"I shall volunâ€" teer the statement then that their 8 hudidnotuyit,nndl certainly tgought it for hint. " ‘Thepe is no ~doubt he was the active gentleman who proâ€" qurod the duty on flour entering Into the Maritime Procinces, and the imposition of a duty on coal introduced in the Province of O)ntario. He opposed all this while a ‘ \ ubiolii;?:,h::d one ol-hhkh first acts was to 1 a oy own motion, Hon, Mr. ’;“!’JuPPgLTho hon. gentle man says I abolished lhotflal‘oy; if the hon. gentleman turns to journals he will find t.:l:d htwhnt took place=â€"=A mo. tion was e to re; & certain gomon of the duties. . The &:lfl-'n-'-‘ Loaircal e that induced the t the policy, eieligh lt (OWOWiY ult wlea 2 1 Urs at all the Great kxhiâ€" btions. Te s «01 Druggbt ug two ~AHCAL AG es Amecia! itor o °1. a. #ar O:»+sinasl, O, is uie Me» | Weot W orking BaoMiods) aericat $99 Donreny. Fromon 4. Â¥ ; Amepa MSt Movnledent Please giv | 108 » 46 , dao. _ hss mm . _ ; , } f OFFICE AND WARRROUSE::..]............. SPAFL ST, OTIAWA. Rorroligs An Insolvent. under and by as Assignes of ve named Iaâ€" ;ublu Am.',:: rwe & Eer "‘?;Ol’ Carie« C K ’Mllll.'-nf +\ 48 «â€"The houn. genâ€" y 9°‘?,‘Pl0d‘t.:o C 10 SPARKS STREET, OPTPPAWA. ~~ > o _ i ’flmfagturm’A!madMath‘knd Mmlnfid MILL MaCuiNkRy weaveay -gmmnolm 4e n mm y _ e } R@~186 & 188 RIDEAU STREET~@g~ â€" > . M. 1 .mw M wxgw:ufig-%wummu m:h- :%‘& Co in gaitiie is gip secd nc * . e * Oct, 17, 1875. First Prise for MARBLE MANTLEPIRCER, _ .A 2 ie uies First Prize for mnvnfirum o. Firs Praa fo aroin snÂ¥inao® Pipe. _ _ fs hereby given io our patrous and the pubile .â€"gh;ga-n» â€" inat this. 'p.;a ba{ve ded;iéd Lo continus & molgo.n agn. nave gto.r ‘a they have OPENED .. â€" N orr%l, under the managemeit a&-..ow”"-’ m newly appointed Genaral agants #l» sn ul °, CAaeigel newly appointed General Agents for the Otlawa Branch Ottawa Branch â€" â€" â€" â€" â€" â€" â€" ”&irk&flni CLUFF & MILL, GNERAL AGENTS:â€" _ _ SCOTT, CAYLEY & CAYLEY, â€" _ MACHINERY DEPOT CANADA lssn Agricultural Insurance CGo+ At .heir Spacious Rooms, Are prepared to execute Oiaq for STIFF ~BROTH hC "olamene n ange A First: Class Family and Commercial e omuatecue soarmmee :s * gike 14 9 yok #3° orders for: DRES3 SUITS,. W AukITHG S0its, OVERCO ATS, aod all kings of: ing executed promptly ard fimm:fl‘u .."m VtAF io #a +. 3, 1478 AlA ® "ED ve b# ®) % sb WELLINGIOXNXâ€"STREE oProstTe 1 >+ ce P. é.ABU%l%R, Ottewsa, Jaz. 27, 1876. * ueiiendnriage _-_7__ * 7,”. JOSEPH * DIMBLEBY FASHIONABLE: TAlLORING Es 29 |W3fi 1875«â€"PROVINCIAL EXHIBITIONâ€"I187 $A Thiey: respectfully. rolicit.& Visit. W, M. SOMERVILLE, _ _ > MARBLE & GRANITE WORKS, NOW . BROADWAY Winterâ€"C0 Ottawa, Fob, 14, Otiaw», Feb, 12, 1378 or THE BR8T CANATIAN, ENGLIE ~ aAND AMERICAN MAKE BARGAINs :; Ottaw», Feb, 17, 1876 Tuey Alex. ALL KINDS.~"OF PICTURES, will a‘so ffod the 1S CHAS:®:BRÂ¥son GENERAL ROEBEEERETET: SPA&REKS STREET PHOTOGRAPHY. all 66 & .68 SPrares srerpy CAPIIAL, â€" _ $1,000,000 ~Russell & Co. Cotton‘s . TO MAKE the work of vir Milliners, Dreas 22" ORDER® PRYPTLY pyp ROBINSON‘S ~BLOCK, .. SPECIAL NOTICEB ite" Assurance. OFFICE, ‘~MONTREAL. WERE TAKEX BY oUTFIT TING Hyt aRLing@ussat EW AND SEOONDBfl’D "STEWART, DK LLLS, BRLTING, ; FLLES, AND OPEN:. > â€"._ GEOREGE =©ACRES»â€" BPRISG 4 AT ‘at Co BARGAINS G3008, "|Jaoâ€" and Tallors, unry 4009 1 > 44 i4 ""Détantial ameigamation of the tw« °°Da~.. i I do not know this,from hay ing in London for the last four o lny:t::l-uit.&dh&.d that th6Â¥6 whs a workins ammnramant a dicted bas since taken place, He hs appealed to the hon. mover of this reso.u tion to state on whut ground ~there is : substential ameizamation of the tw xu..u-qxi-unu'-afi-b. has show» a. the imputation that there has w-d&om as I my hon. friend, Mlflhyummhhh &dvocacy of that bill, I will do him justice, and I think be will that motives. Nor will I say one word to showito this House that â€"what I then preâ€" _ o O We â€" PHTpOses, the Di Company have been guilty of a f the measure jad thait the wfi-&-" step : in the civilization the day. It not follow from that I know that some gentlemen say we / gial to the people, in wrong in not fixing a as to their tariff, and if it has be :‘M bhl.:h:":d to inte ts and purposes, the Ca of hon. gentiemen who differ from rfl-‘ ma bhnrllht-d us it on that ground. It is v well khown that in this mou, eB eroment have not a majority Mh*&r‘fi’ t was a ported in this measure by a large num/ Btl“ i L *""T-' TOEW mE 1 will y it. MR 4 one, ‘a%; persing the Bill las We us involving a sare bass. ~NSC 10 sSay aDoué it ; if 41 -nyunbufla-n‘m if language to use against the mepnpeedingeai > o : Cmy the old company and the new one. presume he hssy not without some Ne ( d . that kind has been done, I do not kn what to say about it ; if there "has be Hon. Mr. KADLBACHâ€"DoI u stand my hon, to say that ; has ao \ ~of rates t% i ,i' who has stated "VT 2% wWhs DICKeNn IWice near th‘. 4 Evidence "was found in both rmolg that the cable was broken by an an dnu-d::v-h-‘a.mmbh.. for the last few months, he will find 1 on both ‘occasions (hes ue o ofempanies the m ---u «©UOR . xw C a:a'w.'..d.,““.z‘“"”._ ....:}5 :“_‘.‘.‘::"h.:‘;"‘._"h‘"~='-l~u- tion to the Address, hon. friend fro :z-iudfiou charge seventyfive cents ? â€" remembered rl“w«-& rh-nl-='uhb wm which we had reasoh to believe the influence of the Direct Cable: It is 10 be hoped that it willâ€"not> that our (_icv:nncnl of fi feased purity, have, through opo‘y. 1do not know what aoes Cns aloen jy , k d united as to argon, :":. ‘a‘ &s “fim_. the Stass of ful compoution, ing rights * af t place, but this much sppesrs cable competition â€"would Now lt is just possible that tion of the two companies before this House, copies of : flfiflrdnum ment and "Direct Cable o‘ht:uu‘;‘:g:o&bkm Ist October, 1873." It must be the minds of every honourable t, the animated mfiuum Government titled "An‘Act to reguiate the tmand."hhm:,. seemed that the legislation of ernment was inspired in the a company known as . the T viounn.an of . Parhament iteelf similar legislation, and some dn â€" 3“ last _ 1t was pe the ® | ts avme mm ""L‘. mu;lybm "l’ottb‘otdx‘.‘o Oommnl Direct w-h-g%.u' fitk the denire to prom: is the terest ‘” ) ama aid Af the uooo cellency the Governor Geners r then 1 ve clutched at C % Soigh d eC TRE SENATE when m between the t that the Dontinued of a fraud on did the