The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

“Demo . helm-u Newhomeownersfaceincreasedcosts _ ., - .,‘ 7 .‘ asboardsraisedevelopmentcharges 4‘ Dill-Alum responsible for land pur- nestlSye-sot'yuwthf . ' 41.. . khan-lids chases Critics of the increases. "' #13:! ’ s W Although the boards which included the City of "' ' 4' . hose was; out for a wound jointly to set the new Kitchener and Kitchener » h OWL?“ ”y.0 u I new home in Water- education tax rmWaterloo Waterloo de- ‘ an 51;" ‘ ' F, loo Region will now Region District School mace. argue theeducation ‘ ‘ $35 have to dig a little deeper Board's portion of the fees development tax increases ‘ 1‘ . “ , into their wallets to help are (guide-nth W than should be phased in incre- 7‘ 5.1.”; 73;“ 0 local school boards buy the portion levied by the unruly if . ‘- ptopertybrnewsehools Waterloo Catholic District it’s also a?“ that the ‘ The region’s fiblic and SchoolBoard. fees shouldn be applied : a. Catholicboards vevoted Forenmplathepublic wflhawidespteadqiproadi s ' 3’ to increase their share of sdwdbtiard'ssharewllm because the school boards” » development wagon heSlMpernewtesidalhl plans to purchase “green- newhsmshymme so dwellhtgwhiletheCathnllc iield'landsisatodthwith per cent. bringing the new board'sdurewilbem city goals that emphasize . y . educatbndevelopmenttax Thelarger.publlcboard mbanintensificationratha toSZmlpa'newred‘lmthl willbetaskedwithbuying “Mum my“, new land all! buldhig me Althoudt several public . The development tax. newsciimhtobqptmflh Wigwam OFF which has to be renewed growing student counts. adioolboaldludanybed- everyfiveyears.willalso explainedMatthewGerud. hackabouttbeincreuein ~Q‘c‘3‘1sNC-WS‘ESES V, mean increases for new superintendent of business education development a. ,. 4 commercial builds.ralsing servicesandueasmerofthe meshemothadhs "‘ the non-residential tax rate MW According to the public by about 40 per can to $1.73 'Over the next is years. board. it anticipated the - persquareioot. we'ielookingnalaaam newlyapprovededucation The new educational new pupils attending our tax rate will generate rev- devdopmnmmaoneâ€" boardfhesald. motnearinllfimfllion time fee embedded into the Setting the education perms. . 725 cost of new residential and development tax can be a The fundsde help with Waterloo I 95 ng Street South I 5‘" 3937 non-residential builds, goes trickyprocesswhaiuyingto required [an costs all the .Dary ”‘9“ . 809850! _ ~ ' ' _ tome - intoeiiectlune l. prediuemolnnitgruwthhe way up to 203i. as well as 0' an ' 0' Daniela ' Dr 0.an "a.“ Op tnsts The provincial govern- noted eliminate the current $21â€" W- a”- new merit funds the building of ‘You make a five-year million deficit in the educa- “$2333.33“ may 5.- mm":i..°&5'$: :- 5, 203. new schools. buthoartkare bylaw. but it's based on the tinndevelopmentcharge. "‘""'“""‘““'"'“""""“""""*°“‘""“‘°" . ”an? m Ontario Energy Board . if __ "1-; *s .3. . $1177 ‘ Vt; "77f? fix. e“ 21%.)? ‘5‘ .‘ . fife 4 _ $1, . _ .» ., 4 z; *7? ' 7 r” H735“; I77- 2: ‘ , C, ' i; 7 I. x If 31%: ‘3' W9 #21:» i; j 3 " »“' , if“ gaging: :2i'3»: 2: 253‘ v: _ fig 5 - 3. $3,; a: in»; as, as} as. , .:- : p552 fifi’g 3:7 . g»: cg , ;; z 3» 2. M3 :r .223" . 31;: a. 21:3; z -. '..,_.;3$§2:» ""2351 “951645 32". ~ «3%. 5V QW’v‘i» “fifeâ€"Mt.’-‘;«.:§,-z\;;r.;;a,.;. ' The Ontario Electricity Support Program offers monthly on-bill credits to help lower-income households ranging in size from one or two people earning $28,000 or less to seven or more people earning $52,000 or less. The credit amount depends on how many people live in your home and your combined income. I glyfifi' “M“? .7": V‘ ’ 5v" 7' ' 7‘ ‘ . ‘7‘15‘3. "'- I M * o ». ’:-'3a:-1 if, ”7% {It .. - ’1” J 2,, 3‘12.» with... 373:. 43.33. ‘5‘ RAE» \ V o ».