The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

j | WATERUX) CHIONICLB'Wednesday. May 7, 2014 0 I7 Open tendering equals fairness for taxpayers and business he issue of fair tendering WWW“ after they were certified, their At this point. the only viable I has become a huge one for protmtothemmrio [about Rela- wastewater project went over- option to restore fiscal stability for Region of Waterloo taxpay- lions Board. W by 83 per cent. We all know municipalities across Ontario is for ersand businm This week. in a separate but that fewer bids ensures higher legislative change to the Ontario We have moved into a bizarre related interim decision. the costa labour Relations Act that definiâ€" 1Wiligtt7mtewhae mum Ontario Labour Relations Board In response to this legislative tively exempts public sector and sdiool boards are com ruled that because a Region of imbalance and the detrimental employers (school boards and to be cum mm “lamina stab fixed a toilet han~ impact on the Region ofWaterloo, municipalities) from mles governe has significant costs for taxpayers die a an addiction (remnant cen- ‘ Kitchener-Gum MPP Michael ing private construction compav andlocaljobs.andproducaleas Heartdinstalledaneonsignata if”, ”a . HartlatabledBill73.theFairand nias readmhpulflicinvesungnt Kirchner bus turnind. the report $33 Open Tendering Act, in May of local residential and business The story stat-ts with the can. on.” be deemed a construction £56 2013. Harris' bill explicitly stated taxpayers cannot afford the inflated striationofawshedinfladm employerbytheOntario Labour "“ ' Moonecttvebargainingnrlwfor costsforlocalprojectsandservices inNovgmberzouthgthsbeen Emmnieridiculousis ?~?‘ mmmunot thatwillbeincurredduetorestrict- we“ matted M flesh“ of matured-and. ' apply to municipalities and school ed tendering. This will cost local MWWW meimpliean'nrnarisirmfmm boank iobsandlomleconomicbenefits to this project on a “may alter drone app-ally ill-aurora evens It fled that all qualified con- This issue is about fairness for noon me; both individuals had are th- “may and thou tractors should have the right, all businesses whether they choose signed an; requesting member- boart‘la up now dew as hamuiminnm' d regardless of union affiliation, to a union or a non~union environâ€" shipwiththeUnitedBrodrerhood Whitman“!!! aloulythiadecisiontocertify bidandbeelip'bleforpublicinfra- mentThemadnesshastoend of(hrputtusand mam. Ontario Labour Relations Act. them: Uriion cotdd have a structure projects (hm an open Both the Cambridge Chamber ca therefore collective bargaining m impact on the coat projec- and mmpetitive bid promos Bill 73 of Commerce and the Greater KW Simthcymdnenfimm mlesforconstruuioncompanles m wadehtedinthe legislature on Chamber ofCommerce will make that anemoom the union Mt subsequently apply to all tnfra- F0, m the new m of Sept. l9.. _ this critical issue the focal point of m "if. them m stmcture pupa: an I! at“ Waterloo wastewater treatment . Elective”. the argon has essen- the upcoming provincial election. xv a, ,. ,. 4 A J? (I , , . t facility under mlylmtthelrongtnaldnllengeof Wewon’trestuntilafair,com- v ' “gr was?" f=.- . a. is ‘ ~‘» 2‘4 calm in the Carpenters Union certification mon sense resolution is found to ' g? 3; ,~ g f”: lab-ulna llllllld and named! faces the prospect of this patently ridiculous and unfair ‘f-u. m {with -“ ' _' "5; have seen the escalating costs for infrastructure situation. P“ _. t. - » . 4 4 projects. while at the same time pre qualified . 4. t . , ' bidders list shutting numerous qualified and m ‘ . . L , “my“, competmtlocalcontractorsfrom lanMcLeant‘srhe ~ ‘ -. (no. WWW praidentandcwq’the Greater 1 ' hm Thisiadeariynotfairtowori- KitcheneererknChamberuf = , ,. em businessesor taxpayers Commerce. 1 PW," h Sunday, May 25, 2014 10am 3m: ~- , .. . ., t [7 ( 7 l i - r ALL NEW FOR SPRING' 3.” .,,~ Mp. , J . v: . s“.- » ._ _ {t}, - ,.,4 43:3," . . if ragga firm? . " '» ~, .. r'sa.;:)~1”sc~7‘fivf$, ;. _ an ”r: s?‘ "A- “viva“??? as . w, ' u v _,."v_; w ,, ' J; .. . , , a ‘ \ ,. , v a c a G 4 . Public Input on Protecting Specnes at Risk FREE x (hmMmmHe-edmha-nbw-tydmmm (hunt! ' menu's, hove-w,aecurun~'atrd' (Madmahymtolhww swmbwmmm,nwdwm- ‘ den-Grunt; My“ that plum that Marat w- M vo- up W|N this 4 lbeM-mmmmammwMWwd-hfmbw » katmkxfauemwoanrjhnsfn-flMWOa-firgm C. ~" ' immtwmdhrwudmâ€"n‘a ‘; O was ! mmmt-lm-flmhde-flfiu .‘ can-tow , "to dead-no for to! a be it 101! famn‘mwormlmm,pbneemd~m.um rrrvu'r phon- landfill” “Hm-(s on hm l m M! 19.3 7-30 VISltUr‘ s w “W Pm for by the PM (1 We» g>0rlab