The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

a - WATbRuX) CHRONICLE . Wednesday November :0 20] i 27") Weber Si N ,Sullt 20 I l I I W‘Iitrlm.0ntanoNll JHK ”(i-WISH) Fu 51978XbUlX‘ â€" uww wattrloochrmicle v.4 7\W Peter WINKLER . l’l'BlJSHER I - «£3: » innoRiAL I M GLAD l FIEY HAN 1,13 .3? ~ TO CLEAN UP THE my Hob \‘RBANA( y. , ‘ i V ’ M"‘:'-", lDlTUR m :29 ‘ ’ ‘ 3 M s editorialta waterltxxhtoim le ta UST NOT SURE wHY we " 3’ ‘ .3 V,’ 4‘«3::- sportsta unitei'looi~ hroiiu Ir ta , :7 ‘; " if; hm“ JA(‘KS(){\ FOCUS IS ONLY ON KING . I. 3' %&‘ Rlzl’tmleR ext :m J ' ,. ‘ fl .3124»? i UKLKWI‘FWilli‘fll‘tll‘lliillltit L4 ' “'"L-"LQVEJ' V”; a» 3: 44 r i ‘ a. a,“ J ; Adam JAt'KSUN l h D542" 1 "- ' .- ;-'.;- ' -' “f : 2’1; ' RlifiileiR cit 2H "' fi‘ 1%? t: " 2‘}! ' '1 ’11,," .-‘ l aiatksonwuaterlruxliroiiit lc la ‘3‘» 17;): J: ', 13: " V ”5‘, i. '- Z V «int-,RTisiNt; ‘. , 7 , ”a, ”3;? lL‘d>\N[)l{RS()Nc\I :m A " I 2 ' i ’ ' . fig Rum mm Al) \Mrs \( it R ;.t_‘ . \ 3:33.55 v Lilldt‘rNUfl‘PH‘Jlt‘rlilxhli‘lllth' “A (j. ‘. C i ~ N “,_‘,. . ' ', 4 ”3,; ‘ i ' . , . 333',“ . , .V, ”'5)"-“ . i i ‘* » #1:» <‘ Mi Ls RlzPl‘U-b‘luh‘lTAllVl- 1 L I i f t ‘ . . . ,. ,fi wok-tit- snzverss en :2: ‘ ,__ \ .. £~ ‘. T i 3» “.ng 'ltslt'u‘ns‘llwalt‘rltxl hronitlc ca 3 .1 f1 . " ;ir=7 _ W f. “ '» a Pl" f a. ”54‘ * :‘l . - --:_ »- \Allas erPRI-SPNTNHH - R\ - K' t i ;\ ‘ ”4.! l ‘ i~-- .. “1'; $5 wins“: 12x J ‘ Ra L\‘ ‘ ‘?lfai.il ll p.” ;,. I? at wrist“ walerlout hllilllk l.‘ ta ' ‘\“~ - "l i :41. > ~ ., I -“ W. V a _ ' ' - I‘ (linsllllll . My \.‘ 3 _ V iiu ms sjio ‘ “ ' ‘ *‘ "y" ' * "\_ ( [kt l lA'l'lUlN ‘lii who 23mm 31‘ ( median PUhllCallOnK Mail Sales Th . C , O m e t1me lsn t n t or '1'] Gs woman Internalional Standard \erial N‘uni n NOV. 25' Council ”flung” share of taxes is lllt' h" MSNmD'um V FOHOW the money will he constdering. _ largest P3" of the local PTOP' “d"‘d( "mum," H 20‘ and most likely erty tax bill. Any suggestion m ? epresentatives of the Ministry of Municipal Afiairs approving, the final part ofa that regional funding does V szere In the region last week as pan ofa provincial plan to |n[{uduc9 a Tax not cost the (Atty of Waterloo -""'-/ overnment review of the Ontario Municipal Incentive (irant with a goal , . taxpayer anything is mislead A0013 @- Board _ to 888ml in the development é“) ‘ "1% If the “Tim“ ‘5 WWW” â€"‘â€"- lhat s the qiiasiriudicial provmcial body which acts of envtronmentally contamr ‘ f' i ' mg the above initiatives that . "if “flak“ ”WWW" “ WWW“ like a court of appeals for local municipal deCiSionx It has mated lands m if“. HIV ”f ’ means the (‘ity of Waterloo “Jazziufiin M “(WWW been in the news lately for some of its controverSial deci Waterloo ' f 3 property taxpayers are pro ()VTARIOkEXS (‘til Nt‘il stuns, including one that reversed the Region of Water 'lhe puma“. (“1‘ng is an \ 51‘ nding funding too. the wmxithnmic u .i rtrnihrr loo‘s Official Plan proposal to limit the amount of new I admirable one gm when is ., (Iouncil is also inserting ”' “if (Mi PR“ ‘ “1"” “h” developable land to as hectares and instead opened up my "gm “me to implement a itself into the dynamics til L2‘:m:m:’f‘yfi:l'::n’l":::: more than I!!!) hectares for developers ]1(,? In my opinion. ” is not BOB market place transattitins ‘ no” tflmm dymmm. u, ”Mm [he region is nghtly contesting that deciSion in court now Why spend funds on a MAVIN After council apprmes “(is ‘ druid Tim h: turn to the mug»: and has the bat king of the prtmnce in what is seen as an K03] that .5 currently already the owners of lands that were I P" """Wlu‘d ~"mP‘1im‘ ~"‘ N important challenge of the provincial Places to (irow pol l mfemng significant financial With an estimated $500,000 most likely already acquired Elf: a;?::,;,mri\.f latiim '0‘ "‘3‘ 1‘ attemptinit to Pia“ “”7“? ““3" mem Wm" “ support from the taxpayer annually from the Region on at discounted PM 1“ due I“ we win in meson new development Initiatives are alfeady top of the taxpayer invest erwironmental contamina ("Milan “‘9 TRIO" hi” also charged that the "MB W?“ “3“" underway that are meant to merit in the ”(I It Just dries tion can proceed to develop ‘ ”If ”Wm“ 0' "I" “VFW" 4" when it came to that deuston with the developer's keyl WWW” community redevel not make sense the lands and still pix ket the 1:33? Ill; ‘mw’mwf'm‘fldfi‘fim'f WWW“ Ming the same ""9 "‘3‘ instructed the WWW" opment A myiriuatification Another current taxpayer additional taxpayer grant to i .31 time“?! A” mm, “W“ m edly independent bodyon how to render such decismns in, “,0”de 3] billionipiu, supported reder-Iupnipn] (river the cost riftht- cleanup i restrml and «mat w H pm While those issues are before the courts. the workshop [W the [Kl is the impact on mum“? is the long ”WK“... the question still "mm“ "'"“k‘ "l “M m" "u" hl'ld last W99" brought all ”1“ stakeholders "WWW"? redevelopment. ll' that is the King Street streetscaping remains W719" “4 K‘Wl “WW ”‘1 “'“ "m fl” ‘TL'M ”m"; int hiding dew-lopers. to ask what changm needed to be case. me, that already a huge from “b nonh m Uniwmfy to implement .i ll(. pro gi“):”‘l::‘:: :Lzml; “Jinnah made With the body Some of the suggestions include Infpnllvc for redevelopment Again, how many of the gram? lhe answer is still rela um.” Mmmg mum “Mali-i more transparency by the (“All better act ()llnlahllll‘y. in Waterloo between now properties redeveloped in lively simple when it is ‘ ”'3‘” i l“ 3’9 we” 5' N “W 1““ dmh'KU'W and better DUN" mm“ and the pmposed ”(I startr that corridor will have some needed I; iii'iii‘slipili‘m'NA-J "‘3 While all those directives are importanti act essihility update 0(2018, environmental t‘ontamina Perhaps the better tinting m“ N ”my, MN “‘- * should he at the trip of the list as the current appeal } some of those I)” related tion7 I am not sure anyone is when there are no green A, Mi _ t m, “w,“ “a”; pro( Ms relies heaVily on municipal law spot ialist.s and ”.dvvpiopmpn” w,“ have knuwg‘ but the kpy Wlll he field development approvals ‘l it w - ‘ And m. paid expert opinions that put the costs out of reach for l pmmmnwmai contamina that redevelopment Of [h()§f remaining and the benefits “3‘” “ ‘ " { “ “ ‘ " j: the average t iii/en In fat t, one Waterloo ( iti/en had to In,” RV appromng a hf, pro pmpertim may happen with of the current I'l‘dt‘W‘lttan‘lll um. i 1 it ,i ‘ HI. remortgage h” “”7““ l" W“ a WWW" hearing ll" h” J grain now. council is piggy» tint incremental asustann‘ of llllllHll\‘(‘\ and the existing -' M vi ‘ tor lPWa' ”WWW" U"""“"“‘l [WWI hat king an estimated aTlGat this time. intenSifit ation plan mm; “H ' w n - 'in lfthe provim e inSLst< on keeping the antiquated ( )MH “00000 annual grant pro City ofWaterloo inpaypn efforts have been more fiilh ‘ ‘ A M '" W‘N‘HL ll "W‘H‘n‘lm‘fll‘l N” d“ ”"Pfillmt'm l gram from the (ity along are regional taxpayers The realqu l l