i a -wamm0momm ital: ,~ “was 52.2.3 3;:- e» -.5 ' ' Ci i b ‘ . , ‘ 1 $3 on tyapproves news gn aw . .g ~ ‘ . â€a†BUM-litmus commonly known as sand- dimtor Danielleingam. , ’-- ’- v" ~ -- § â€a“ armhrfl mm mmwhmbeena UnPaStlfl'iZEd W - Based on those concerns. contentious issue in the city $ 4 i Am. - fter twu years and staflrnadeï¬veievisions for months. and stallinitially F U]? HO] By ........... . /Ib : Atom kicks at the can, A sign Variance commit- wanted to remove portable I SIM“ city council is ï¬nally tee will be formed and will signs from many of the city’s Natural ONLY : norvumm happy with a proposed sign include two members of plazas and strip mall areas. I mm mm M JAN. 12 ' m f .g AlmOnds . /lb .gggggg g. g bylaw. councrl and mernberso in October. several busi ' ' ........ I,.-.---x=mu..m=- Coundllo rs' ï¬ve the public. This will help ness owners and portable ] )ned as“ : OFF recommendations made by streamline the process while sign operators came out in C - 499 a city staff on Monday night keeping council aware of the protest of those changes. mm .mm........ /lb : $20 purdiau before unanirn ously passing overall visual aesthetics of saying the bylaw would hurt v . . I . . . . . , . - a . all (an: therevmons thecitythestaflreponsaid their business and give ‘3 g; ‘1 g :>-_ t; g H . ; " : While some would rather Council will delegate ï¬nal Kitchener businesses an .. “Weasel; -..~ *' ,- "Wmâ€; , 2 Ayn. - see portable signs taken oi? approval authority on vari~ unfair advantage. ,- " :43; .1; ,5; “ t ' ’r : 5| the sidewalks and out ofthe ance applications to the Amendments were made - ( . 3; m, r _' :__ " - . ' 28-) g . ..:‘31I"°"“â€citys plans â€"- a component committee, with council actâ€" following that October meet- .- 3;; -. ‘ ' ‘ 1* . : vwo MM†JAN-3' of an earlier draft bylaw â€" ing as an appeal body. Staff ing to allow mobile signs in ' '5 ., “ by?“ '» i "" †-â€" 5 5 » councillors understand the will also provide quarterly many of the city's plazas, but 4 - " " ’W""- 7' -. F 5 - - -~~ -' - - need for local businesses to updatestocouncil. new concerns were raised remain competitive with The report also suggested Nov: 26 by many ofthe same neighbouringcities. maintaining the status quo mobile sign owners, saying “Portable signs are not with regards to the Lise offluâ€" permits on accessory signs 1 pretty and i think the city orescent lettering as stafl'do added more red tape for i would be more beautiful it not believe the colour of the businesses. They also we did not have them. but signs acts as a visual distrac- requested fluorescent letter- we would be giving an unfair tion since there are no movâ€" ing not be allowed. advantage to Kitchener busi- ing or ï¬shing components Some members of council nesses.‘ said Coun. Mark Further clarity of when a were not happy with the staff Whaley. site plan or full survey is nec~ recommendation to involve The last time council dis- essary for the siting of signs council only as an appeal cussed the bylaw they will-also be provided in the body. but lngram id the reached an impasse over bylaw. changes presented ï¬cnday howto deal with it. Themain Accessory signs will not night addressed those worâ€" . concerns were centered on need permits but will be ries. and said the public has \ ‘ N†‘ “ “ the role ofcouncil in review- required to be at least three been very involved in the ‘ - _ . - 3 . . 3 3 ing sign applications, the metres apart to reduce visu- process througii eight public ' ,_ a .5" f ‘ l _ continued use of fluorescent al clutter on sidewalk meetings. » g l“ " I letteringonmobilesignsand “We don't want to see Council is expected to g 3. : , J I 1' the necessity of acquiring signs side by side by side,†pass the bylaw Jan. 28, and it i 1,4 j *3 permits for accessory signs. said zoning committee coor- will come into aflect April 1. j “I as, ' z ,. g j i A“ ‘ , I ‘ ‘ l '. :7 I K ' g V x“} is ‘: *3 J ‘ E; I k I? 2 2- 1 I, "g i V( ‘ ‘ - i - " 1 it. " 5-.§' sh \ .1l : ; 3 i ,3 ; - .1 g.‘ § {we 5 rA-..' é ; 1* i. 3; . ‘ f, H t ,. . . 1 fuéiiw r†; 3»: s. . e ' - c3353? ( .. g? . "A a- ; 3.‘ t- ’3 -_ ‘ - ’ 5...; 1‘ ;, . ' ".1, ma ' Q w ~ -3. » ts, :s. . as. e." . , - ‘ 3,1? : .K"? ; to} Tours - Entertainment ° Sweet Treats - 8r More! ‘ ll 11 ta gs: M Cad OW§ Grocrous Retirement Livmg j 208 Hespeler Rd., Combndge, ON ! 3 ' I %n more inioimation caflfl 5 i 9â€"620-9999 ._..._._._____~._.~........__.___... ...e...._._.______,._ 3