The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l mmmm-memozoun 0 Wm: A , i V‘ _ "' ’ all t .. . Councdlor mam new us.» We'll bring your store 4‘ ' .l‘ “~- sees $0131. ‘° 3”” n "" E $1 1 FE a WATERLOO'S Own 'I“ ’1' _ " I . ‘ project £19-38‘é-2&§‘b "CES- ""1m3-'~ Kat p as it a 5’s? 3 ‘i _ g REM ,7 l-‘l'fit‘i: oIt ”Li-:- :2; t 0 ! Ila a} ‘“ D “i ,3 ' “l mum-3M1?! “Y“ + igaggiligai (:hmni'rlesm (v " b u g Wmmwmm-Wt-m ADVAN‘I‘GE‘ ‘ PRICES W Eli ii a}; Ie-riergyprojminWaterbondenMathl/ha- A g 3’ F ii leyhmweparedamotionreqtmingcwndltosup- i g“ 33;} portitsoonstnxmn H 9 \x (a 5%: l I Shawky lame! and K. (ontracting would complete \\§\§\ 2012 Em m I 39 a g; the ISM-kilowatt project atop their building at 173 $5“ W“ W in. 5 g 1 Roger St” which is far enough away from any resi- \' “a“mmum-umwnâ€"u-im a}; £33; dential neighbourhoods that might object to the aafiguuu-a‘uu-mmm-mIâ€"m F 33%;; i projectWhaley said: ”wummflnnmmm 1" {a 33;: ~j'm very much in favour of solar projects,” the - , .3i‘ fig. councillor said. adding Waterloo North Hydro had ' l .J ‘ . , in , {iii already approved the project. 'Anythingwecandoto ’_ v 514;: ’ I ' " * I u. “ §9 23. lightentheload on fossilfuelsisagoodthing' _ . y 3“.“ 7- _ .. ¢ , ,o g“, , . %§ a? a? ‘ " ‘ " ' , f3“ " grei The project would cover half of the roof of the 3* 3“,. " 7493’s,? eflr’y‘m‘} , A 2,,!»7_ ‘- . if? 99' i 9 100,000 square foot facility roof and cost $2 million ”M ' "‘" ‘7‘“ ””1"” ”13* . J ' ‘ , 1,4; ”,7. 'V 3 7 7 3,3, 5; i a to build. said Fahel. He expects to generate some- ' ' ” f ‘ ' ' V ' I ' ii; 3 23% W5]? between 5250.000 0 l aiizgilg an 3350.000 annually. m ' " if “I'm very much I Shelfsaid h; wast; SONATA Im iiglfilgggi . 00 us or any nanc _.. aura-m . m favour help from comm. _.a._m~:m1:mxxxg 3 Egg 9 E}? OfSOIdI' just their written support gunmanâ€"unaware: . ' £3; 5%; g .i . ,, ofthe project. _____ 777-77 __ I .- â€" ,3 g; g prOJECIS. “We have the build. ‘ l 3 7‘7“" l, ‘ fl 5 E $3 3 ing. we have the electri- 3, l A m, 2, 15,111. m 1 I t ‘I'I I a, a + I, : 3} - l E my“ cal capacity. and the ~31 ,5, All '1?" ‘ ,y g, r; t ,7 7 , t "W": W ' " L 7” iggtsgizsis mm hydro company doesn‘t " .yt-eaI-‘F'eofi. ‘w1?"-’t‘t7r~'t"‘i*"’*‘iw wit” ‘ , J _. ~64...“ m ‘3 If” 0 “me to do too much,” 7 - ; . ' , ' f . - . ,- ‘ ‘ a?” ‘53 k - Fahey - I .l believe we're at“: N2, A4 a? §3§¥§ 3:23; first to approach council and we're looking lorw {3‘ 9‘3 2012 .â€" ' " [0 a partnership." \ <9 ‘ 11,650” 7:,” iii 3:3! in» Under the Feed ln Tariff (FIT) program with the 0 “aw-Immmmumnm 3" is g a: Province of Ontario. projects can be fast tracked in » "“ m-um-unâ€"n-I-um-mm-wul 3 i 4.1% the qut‘ut’ it they collect seven points. with munici- . """“""‘"""”"”“" in . 3% g pal approval oi a project worth two points M _ _7 ,7 a i; g . According to the FIT two-year review report com- m -7 ' ,. , I .~ , . +1 ",3 . 333 g 5; I pic-ted earlier this year. "there is an opportunity for ,7 a...“ 7 ’ ,5.) . *1” t’ f' "i ‘ ’ ‘ ' {63’7” . High 13 municipalities to play a greater role in the develop- « f 7 . , ., 1; , ,7 T has. - ' .;;Wtf":fl$iߤ3r ,7' " " ’2 mm _‘1 it i'; i merit of renewable energy across the province. Proj- 59,7 "‘ . ' "" ' ‘ ’ . ' I I l i ”3 a g i. 3; § ects with municipal support should be prioritized by b“ ' ’ ' ‘ " a i- {‘64 awarding points during the application review r “a; a?! p rocessf 77:13 _\ f ‘ I 5 Points can also be awarded based on the benefit $3.3“ mm Hg.“ no. igfi as ‘55 of the syxtem (one point) or the project’s readiness 5,“ w 131:? «mm-us). =mmamxmmvxr jail it tag Whalcy said stat? and council should support the “in... E, A! :53 _ project. since ll will be built at no cost to the people ”'fâ€"~_fl"’fl= mum-mm l. i of Waterloo and would contribute to the greater ben- m - m. g 1?} l I A {g cm of the entire city. lie provided a notice of motion 1 . A ~~ ‘ , g is i 321;“ at the My 23 council meeting to provide the other , _ a ft 1 i 4, ‘, l I i ‘h J ‘ . 1 a h i members of council with lots of advance notice of 4 gcufl~ V 74¢»; - V. 7,; L . ,' ’4', r’ ‘1: , «We. 5 5 3. ' 5 S3 ‘5 R lht‘ project. 9 {fifle's‘tifl}"‘ 4,, ”A“, , “a." t,g.',w¢,,,.t;g4 V > , ,\,,,‘,:? .4» ,4 . ,. ”it, ,3; I a; ‘ it? Whaley Said he hoped stall could prepare the " . ‘ > ~ ii, {5.51% motion in time [or the Aug, l3 council meeting. it , _ 3i 5 i 5 would be a one-time approval. he added. and would ' ' " id “ g; .. not include any mud generation projects. m :33: g! 3 i VISit “5 ”min at m m m iigigiiligi . WW MM MM D I ,. m.waterloochronlcle.ca «we mow-mu mum 3 ~. A o _, momma-no Mina-sun momma i n s S 3 your community newspaper Mill!!! WW WW MW 5 1-395: 0 M