Ontario Community Newspapers

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 25 Jan 2012, p. 7

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

I 7 ,, 7‘â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"_â€"â€"â€"â€"_____. WAWQW' - ' Mqu2-7 0 Numbers su use local councillor , , t r j 7 ‘ (Iontlnuedfrompagel the proposed Waterloo light rail being proposed by the region. / ‘j H} I l k L 1,“ fl ‘ system of $43 million was highâ€" which would see the private sector t l l A " a” s engineering structures. road jtiiic- Stllil million project cost divided build. maintain and operate the V W“ ’ ' ’ ‘ r tioii prioritization. maintenance by the 19 planned project. was i ' and depot facilities, project over» kilometres of LRT “ , . designed to find heads. light rail vehicle acquisition track. Its very dlficult efficiencies. if there WEEKLY SPEC“ and service headways." (iin'ngacost per were any. to be Jill 23. Jill 2, According to (Iockle's initial kilometre was the to compare apples found in the â€"â€"'â€"â€" review of the project after being industry standard. and apples â€" [100 region's engineering my. Best contacted by the Chronicle. the Chronicle research . plan. 3 ‘ costs for staging and enabling found, for describ~ pro/ecu; 9" an "We're doing 3mm HUMP “on“ “who 3'99 h , works. utility relocation. construcâ€" ing costs ofLRT. [nternanonal everything we can “mm" Store II A lWlnni DollSl' iion management. construction Almost every basis n to make sure we may,“ ”M39“ no l hamge order contingency and project looked at. ' bring this project in 4 018de sumo BLACKFOHEST . .igenc\ costs make up lit per cent from Ottawa to _Q,un_sflnsmd|md at the best value for “A" $3 99 . - .. PORK W 88.80 to. . ID. ot the project costs. lzdmonton to those on me wfldiffiwnms taxpayers. GES â€"â€"_â€" ( onsiruction management. in the ll.S.. refer- Strickland said mum swim BTW“ Brand Marble 1 tonnngenci and agency costs total euced costs in land acquisition 8 I to per tent ot the project‘s soft terms of how much each kilometre made up a large pan of the region's $1 'm a. ‘3'59 0' CHEESE ”761 k“ 7'99 lb 1 t l i\(\ of thick would cost to complete. costs. possibly setting it apart from A“ 0" PM PM“! I" . I " the ptttjct'l costs tire too high, But regional (bun. Sean Strick- other projects. MSG" 6mm“ WM! Dorian“, at?“ “um-rt ’ ‘ ‘ i in .i lilt’ltll or one land said he wasn't Tuesday, Button turned down Wflhommmm | II n ”a “3 old" third lll ll“ t’Nlllllit- too concerned (kickle‘soffer. “mhwm p y " ‘ tron ‘t ocklt'said W ‘ , ‘ about expert opin- "The region completed a value my t mummy [up Hitttlw‘tk‘wt 519.699.4590 (tickle s.iid estiâ€" ”u protect COS“ ion offered byCock; engineering exercise during the mom t LN, FL ‘ H - ‘ L wwwslemtnletmealsca mates look high lot (If? too high by a le and Malcolm functional design phase," she said 1 whole purchases factor ofone-third Johnston. a mem; in an email. “It is anticipated that too , , , ,, ber of the nght Rail further value engineering needs my??? cw, f _ ;. saga-g; .â€" at “a, ‘(Wx‘v‘fimwi‘N-szm' " I he cost ot III lily estimation. Transit Association. will be addressed by the general g~l ayfidfioghfi'g‘ %% Slot) niillioti tor the ‘ David (‘ “e despite his surprise engineering consultant." gilt ’ “1? $3,435 5" F t? 3 iii; a. ‘ i H which-s is very Internal/anal If” “WHO" at the expen analy- Button said the regions project a” , t f 1 ti‘tifé‘f'? , " fwtg,’ ., t l : ('\pcl‘l\l\'t' all S. L I.) H , L . SIS. , doesnt fall into the system for per 2}? ~ ‘ - "f Li; A;5';.e»-t,’;' t..â€" v 1,04 3c » l . .. u Rt’giutiofllrtlerlrios .. , s. . L L, a , _ 5 million each. l‘hose numbers kilometre costs because of the bus Pf ., . , L, - _.< * _ I . , _ proposer! Srllflltiillronplan . . . . , _, . _ .. , , .â€" , no u-_ 1 (ocklesaiid. lrains- werea little surpns- rapid transit component and an A ; A a" q». » -. ; \ | port for London ing to me." Strick- shared costs between LRT and ' . ‘ _ ' 3 I hadthefirsiol’sixnewSiiidIerVari laud said. “It doesn't compel me to BRT. t H t p urn . ;- m t t , it . t. obahn trams delivered last week rethink the model. Waterloo city Coun. Diane Free- g.“ H M , _ ’ r 1 1 for tlit-(jmydon lmmlink sistem. “lt's very difficult to compare man said she was putting her faith ‘ , ’ . M w‘ L H ‘ J ‘ "..\t a total contract value of apples and apples â€" two projects in the region’s engineering reports. 1 ' ‘ 1 ” ’_ p ' ' My 1" l6.:lni million or {2.7 tnillion on an international basis. I think “I have to trust in the analysis “' ' ‘ ‘ ' mm. each that is $4.3 million each. that when you look at a project of that was done in coming up with . ' ‘ l v ' i ' ' ‘ U My Everything about the Waterloo LRl' this scale there's always going tobe the costs,” Freeman said. “I have to t. tn F‘ r ti: it L A to i m t 1 tr L scheme is very extx-risive." some differences of opinion in tmst in the process that the region u: LL , r; m L L last week the (ihronicle whatcostsaregoingto he." went into in coming up with the D m, . ; L . iv . L revealed the cost per kilometre for Strickland said the P3 model numbers” . ‘ ‘ . F ‘ , PM u . Rental housmg _ t 0 N I A R l o _ TE , a ,. ,, . g , \ 253, 0 H f; ‘L‘thitj if j . {a .; _t of. t if; 7. L L t: » w e; ~ , As the ‘-\prtl l deadline for the ‘f: _L;sf':;~..{§‘;w, 12W; - ‘ . , of. - ‘ "~..j iitipleiiietit.itioti ol'Watcrltm's rental â€"â€" 1 “it”; 11, . ~ - . , 4 housing licensing bylaw approach- “mmvamr i" KW Foot f 70:1“. .. t ' , L 5? es. the city is oftertng sessions to if 1 ' 'L""""""‘ A»: s: help landlords apply. _â€" (he. V ’ . ‘ , J 71 g. ' L . , a Beginning luesdtiy Feb.” the / ~ , 7 if ~ L l” 1. ' ', City of Waterloo will host 15 work- ' g .. 9 \ ' \ shops to help landlords apply for r \\_j - residential rental licences. _‘ . \’ Sessions will be held Feb. N. Is. Specializing In All . TFSA Special 16. 28 and 29 from I to 3 p.m,. 4 to 6 _ » ' l- ' pm. and T to 9 pm. Space is limited ‘ EUROPEAN AUTOMOBILES < .1 O% to 30 participants per session and , ‘ . ‘ ._____â€" rcgistration is required at h" ‘T ““ ‘ . ”M7“ rentalfi'waterloo ca. u it t ‘ t MM“ ”WM", The rental lituhlllg licensing (now t t g t t t; ' ' a If. ., . ‘ byla’w was passed May 9. 201 1 after L _ w . M a?“ m film " 7" é”. .- , i mth con'trtwtl‘rlsy ll 1 d . ' ‘ Audrlllw, ”CW“, "553" /, “. , m-h‘ongUf local any oca am on s oppose ‘1‘ 32- A ’ ’ ’ ' l ”than“ w,“ mm.“ mm {he ., mm mm , v nvéislment pecialist! ty owners from renting tint more A 7‘ A» Wflflh‘mm ‘ L “000"wa than four bedrooms in their home, i “WWW ”New” It does not apply to high rises or ‘ _ mm M Km melarifiwmyndnm: apartment buildings 1, WWW“ Abioday and GNU“ a ’ your 1 , ' 519-578'2052 Manual plan With someone you ( an trust /“ ”Add” {Eca Q l :‘ . v P SY(‘ H [C F X PO ' investment specialist ; i 4 ,. , 1 K local ‘, secure ‘ trusted i a » ‘, g . \' & R i ,Q alarm” » “new t’ttt'wnstcatwm \_- “5:71!" “t f ,«,,A, ,-, {saw yFlthlft‘t um tor map and FREE stull’ m. mâ€"Tzl- xx / " s“ I ...::'._...:.._.,, L Q January 27, 28, 29 “mm 0 ‘ ‘ Best Western Hotel - Guelph on“. xiv-mm r

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy