The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

wmwoam-M . mam-s .. "i 11‘. . . - , . 7 h 4 . are 7 ‘ ' 3" > ' lush, . to a»; . fir w ' as. ,V _ f)“ 5““; ,ktzfl . » â€"-~â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"wâ€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€" 1 . ‘ Back to the drawing board Regional council votes to re examine bases as a rapid transit plan [3ma MACDONALD " a .;. ‘ ' - _ ‘_- a; it .» _â€"“’â€"â€" ' “l ‘ - "- W :55 493‘» uses are back on the table ‘ " ‘91“; B after regional councillors ’ " agreed last wek to re- . examine buses as an option for . 1. rapid transit. ' ‘ ‘ Council had previously a approved buses for Cambridge. '. while a rail line was slated to be -. .. a built along King Street in Kitch- . ' , " ener and Waterloo. , ,E , Last year. funding from the “a“. . , F ii federal and provincial govern- , 131 ‘4‘ ments for Light Rail Transit - - i‘ came. leaving the region on the a. f g. hook for $230 million in capital 3y costs. _ Politicians faced opposition _ ' I to the plan during October's ‘ ‘ election, leading to Wednes- I m M l day's decision to bring buses . . _ rs . i back into the fold. . ‘ -â€" w ‘ “It was made very clear in i T ”an. VJ 2” a the election that there were ' .. 0 o " ’71: _, ~ concerns." said Cambridge \ . .2 £3 a.» > ' ‘ 0 Mayor Doug Craig, who tabled , . . ' a ‘<‘ the motion to reconsider buses. " l a ‘ E M â€"”"' Regional council completed ' an environmental assessment two years ago that weighed the - l pros and cons of rail versus 1 buses. It was determined that as: u l rail in Kitchener and Waterloo ,. l and buses in Cambridge was ' , "~ l the most cost-effective plan. I. ‘ After {New and provmcial Bus Rapid Transit is back on the table after regional councillors vote to reexamine the technology. funding came up short. politrâ€" “mm cians started second guessing t that decision. both buses and rail. strued as a condemnation of the rapid transit initiative as we 1 Citizens in Waterloo were That has been in the works LR'I‘. could have."Wideman said. 1 always suspicious of the plan, since before the election. said instead. the decision serves Coun. Tom Galloway called j said Mayor Brenda Halloran. regional chair Ken Seiling. as an assurance that the region for a new communications : “There's a mistrust of the “I think this motion is a little is doing its “due diligence' on scheme that focused less on process that came through the redundant,” he said. the project. how transit would be imple- region.” she said. The motion to reconsider In other words. rail transit is mentedand more on why itwas ; “A lot of people in Waterloo buses was passed with only one not off the table. chosen. i felt they weren't engaged and dissenter. Kitchener Coun. lean Councillors acknowledged ‘We need to focus not so . felt that it was a done deal as Haalboom. that they had heard plenty of much on how. but why,” he ] soon as they walked in the door Though regional politicians complaints about the transit said. 1 (to public consultations)." backed away somewhat from plan during the election, but The region will conduct pub~ 5 Regional staff are expected the level of support they gave to blamed poor communication lic consultation on the transit t to bring back a report next rail in a vote last year. Coun. forthe controversy. plan and oouncillorsareexpecv l month on funding options for lim Wideman said that Wednesâ€" “We have not done as good ed to make a decision in 1 rapid transit. and the merits of day's decision shouldn't be con- of a job on communication of lune. “ at... . » HEERS » "' 3 i DECORATING l? , -â€"t DESIGN GEN-ruesâ€" : ‘ ' ‘ â€"â€"â€"â€"-â€"â€"â€"â€"â€" ' A 583 KingsStroot N.. Waterloo . ' " i l - ' 19) 712-1121 ‘ a.“ "" 5; - mwmo.w.. 1120VWhSI.N.. 1 , 4A. 7 WW-» ’ , * KlTCi-ENER men l lil‘lllllllllll \lHHlt‘ ”MSW “M57345"