B - mt i Hi i x i tiiittmitu - “milieu!“ Sepleiiibet H mm SW Wet-ct v \ suttc fit “stunt-t â€I‘LMK‘ NI] it“ W4 Mo INN hi W4 mouth awn ‘AJicritnltitittiitlt' ta ' " W 'm7 I’t'it't \\ l\l\l l k M in NH k ' A ‘v 4 ’\ ' ' "f f: _ i‘ ‘ 7 â€"‘ A l!- . llilltIRl'tl t . . ' f"? ’“ ' ‘ ‘ ‘ “git, ‘ .' t' ‘ in \Ri4\\ \( _ .. a W “if . ‘ “111thth SN ' "at; , _ s 1 ‘ ‘ (tilltillcllm“rilt‘lliikitlitlllxll'rd / ’ ï¬â€™ 1 if“ slNHl‘N“‘Arlltllinklllltllltét'td v’ ‘ ‘ \1t'ltitti.iil\l|il\ _ ï¬ "71 A kll’iikllkt'it 1m 1, 'ï¬" ' A “Mahmudurticrlt-hhmmtlt' t,t - [an r¢}’) \ . , Q hit“; ,\|\( “UN \| l) f t“ f I, E _;___.... Rll’iikllRt-ii :i~ 0 M ‘V- f \ s'tititrtrtlrttultitt' witt'tlt-tthinuitlc ti ml ’ v \Il\lR1l\l\ir‘ ‘ 950mm. \‘ ‘ ,' (win \1\i“(lt’\l 3m It _’ 1 (i Rt I\ll \r\ll\\|\'\»\<tlk g -, ;.- If, Mlit‘xld “tilt‘litlk ilfitllltit‘ tit r, _ “Fri, , . *‘ i; t h, 9 s\|i\kti’Ri-st.wi\||\i\ . â€v ,' ’ Herithcrltliflihwt 11: t‘ *\~,_ < r _ A, t t 7 (r A lib-[Mm uJit’rltnlhrtinitlt‘ to xv}. w.“ I [A ‘ j,» 7; ’ ' go ' 1 , 1 ~ Nti'iii.i('\ (‘ \ at 111 " W "with ,,‘ ‘ . . ‘é, ‘( ilt\tuil‘1“rilt'llii‘khfillilxic\ti ‘ ' A m\ ,,; if: ' . 11?“ J'f‘)"; J. / _ A Jenn) \|»\t'\| ll Lei! 31x 1 J a“ â€or . }' v 5: I. , t - lmtn iicillm vulcrltmchrnritt lt' tri H l\ . if‘xhj Jg'tï¬ . ff 2 - ' ‘.v-»" "r 7 t I \\Sllli l) x ’ I, '. ea,†,â€" ,....-r ' a HM we in“ r ‘ 3 that i Minx s it: molt-mint Ill . _ _.__ __â€"_‘â€"1 (utiudun Puhllk alums Mail Sales \ s 1 r y ‘ . . . the (HRONICLE rm lORlAL e nee e er access] 1 1 4005th o o o , , , , A , . , . , [iiiuriirtttonal Standard Serial Nuiir Sk tln th army/ï¬g 14 hung“ (â€" “ * adaptable assures persons he! ASSN “313410 a g on In Ice approval ofa housing ( ll H \ i with disabilities the ogrrï¬rttr .» ‘ a â€192 . . . . . , ' ~ nit ' to arthl ate ii ' in “mm“ H “mm" ust how committed is the City courteil to the idea of hav- development m the ( J \ , y . p 4 p . 4 y . m $ ingapublic skating rink in Place this year? UP‘OW“ that should raise some ( ( H , !\ Ontgrio 502m) wnh and} ~ ~ . . r . ' t ' ~ . en ence, i nit = an se v We re sure that 5 what organizers behind the Skate for sen?“ concerns for our com fespect g 3' / the Square fundraiser are thinking after the City of mutiny , . , '. , . . . The design 0f133 Park is g, It is important to note M g Waterloo extended their deadline to come up With ‘ , d b t'f ll , 1 that the concepts used to â€"â€"_.. another $150,000 for the protect. innovative an eau t‘u it 4. d‘ _ lhc Waterloo Chronicle ts published In only IhI’CC and a half weeks this group Of local destgned. the location WI.†be r - . "1.88! the nee P Of per5(’n5 (Ash wednudai ht Melruland . ' . good and it meets all current A. With disabilities W1“ also Med“ Chm Ltd' ‘ skating supporters have come nearly halfway to their , , be ï¬ . , d' a b , ’ p goal of raising $350 000 And they’ve met the city's initial reqmrements Of the Ontario k A . ne 1 sen": (an; lam yf .t t i , . ‘ ' . , . . ' ' ' ;. incre sin t ir c ances o QMtht) PRbSS ( (WM IL deadline to show that there is Signiï¬cant money in place 511â€de Code and Ontario 3.3 condï¬uing to {five independ- ‘ n.“ “mfimthmnicl‘c is a member and donors willing to step up and fund something that anmng A?" _ A . v at The Ontano Press (ounCiI‘ which "ll dd n th bl‘ The pI‘OJECt sansï¬es an of COUN KAREN ently In their homes and by considers complaints against mcm- W1 a [8 IO? 6 [Hr be square: ' the checklists that we as a ‘ eliminating hazards that [nay her newmpapcry Any complainl But where is the cirys commitment to get the rink up municipal government SCIAN result in injury caused by mutt news. opinions advertismg or and running? ' h M W W 77 A fall ' " ' c . . v ~ _ - ~ ~ . s or other aCCidents. turtttutt should ï¬rst be taken tn the We know that the cost of the Square came under techrucally need to have sat The inttial proposed start A , , newspaper Unresolved complaints bud Ct and while some tax a ers have n. ht] isï¬ed. dard sets out specific Until Oct. 16, 2009, ever)» 9†“f â€Suï¬â€ "‘ â€PM“ Pm“ g ' , p y - h g y However, Watertoo should requirements for making the one in Ontario can review ( ounttl. . ( arlton Street, Suite expressed concerns about Simply plomng t at money be (1 di h' l l 1 . . O . the proposed standard and m. homo. ON . use in back into the project. there should be at least a willingâ€" em? , Pg 3 15h“ We but ' Grimm“! '" mam . * ' ness on the art of council to consider it of accesstbility conSideration acceSSible. including all new Sme" comments. ‘ “WWW†pd. - d th th 1 , 'b in this and all of our plan- construction and extensive You can ï¬nd †at The contents of this newspaper are Coun. [an Amy propose at e at} contn Ute _51 “in a Iications n If "s www.mcssrg0v,0n.ca. protected by copynght and may he dollar for every $2 dollars Skate for the Square fundrais» 3 PP ~ ‘ re ova 0 _ . r . - Currently there is a Word on the street is that This example ‘S another med â€My ft" WNW“ non-Cttmmctâ€" ers collect from here on out in support of the plan. but ‘, ' . r r . A - - “at purposes All other rtghts are that was shot down by the rest ot'council. reqmrement that deSignated the renew committee is split clear 91" illustration Of how "New“! and (“M031 it! It Pm» Council alsot as less that ï¬rm in its support for a fall accessible parking spots are on the housing debate, par- archaic an' developerâ€" h‘hâ€Â°d T" "w“ “y u" “1 m" l h d f h - k ~ h t d » - included in every site plan ticularly around single family biased 0mm“! POI'CY ‘5 by "we“, you mus, hm hm," [he aunc ate ort e rin in t e square espite starting a . allowin develo m to sub- mlwm ofthe (mm ohm a“ tendering process. that comes forward but and low-denSity develop- ' 8 PG » right For further information coir If they were more deï¬nitive or were firm on the no requirement that the merits suchas 133 Park m" Proposals that do fun tact Bob Vrhanac. Editor, Waterloo openin date fundraisers think that would make their adjacent building must From [he preamble of the reflect current best-practices ("hmnicln 279 Weber St N. Sultt . g : . . . . reflect the reality that the draft â€" whether it be in the area m “4'an 0mm N1, mg job much easier in attracting new donations to a protect . .. . , . of accessibilit or other that could hem usebythe time the snow flies folks who need to park in The availability of an I . Yf . . . . .. ' ' v ' VOVI a as Vir n- â€er5 mun We have to wonder about councrl s reluctance? ls the â€10“ Spaces misht_ac_‘“au) adequate supply Of hOUSlng fnemalngmtrgmoz g; Jew latter? to the editor must conum the skating rink project going to cost more than the need toentertheburldingi that meets the needs of per- h . P - ‘ ~ mm ~ full name “mature- mm“ 3425 000 that was originally Projected? And if go would» That is a gap in logic that son wtth disabilities IS Of entage preservation. and “ka numb" MGM“ and , , ' . . '. ’ ' - - bl - 2009 ' h' f As a community. Waterloo h d b ld is inexcusa ein A important to ac ievement o It hone numbers are used only for nt it ave ma e more sense to ui it in the ï¬rst lace? ‘ vcmratrrm purpose-\ and will not he p In luly. the Ontario gov- the goals of the AODA. The ShOUId lead the way in all Of published Names vi.“ not he Wllh~ H ' ‘ ernment released the initial absence of such housing sig- m??? areas â€" ifwe have the held We reserve the nghl inbzdih «rm _ ’ proposed Accessible Hui“ niï¬cantly limits (he opponu. Willingness to do SO. ï¬n'z'ï¬ï¬l'mr'l'flwm"; \ v Environment Standard for a nity for many persons with he warmed by fax [0 steamers! ~ public review period. disabilities to participate in or by email In cdilorl This standard will be a the social and family life “' alflzwlatcrhwhrrmn'e (A “f M mill key part of Accessibility for enjoyed by other Ontarians. (1710!- Karen Still" vered to Waterloo ( hmmdc, . . . . . . . r r 229 we,“ y N Sum 20 Wank†Ontarians wtth Disabilities A society which prowdes repmwntsWamzNonhumt mum N11 ms Act. housing that is visitable and Boundary