The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

s . Mi Hui“ unnotutu - Wednesday. April 3. 2009 ‘ Region of Waterloo investigates living wage for workers 31! Cum MACDoqu minimum wage does not meet that regional (bun. Sean Strickland. ' region would cost $640,000. That implement." he said, V (thnirleSlafl standard. “The discussion around a living could turn out to be a good invest» There has been mixed reaction ‘ At the region. the living wage wage is a continuation of poverty merit. Strickland said to the plan so far. it has been Te Region ofWaterioo is con» would affect staff making mini- reduction strategies we've imple- “Studies found that in the Unit» applauded by poverty reduction ‘ sidering implementing a liv- mum wage. such as housekeeping merited at the region." he said. ed States. by increasing the wages advocates, but others feel it could ing wage program for its low and cafeteria employees A living wage plan has been to a living wage, it increased worker have negative effects , est<paid workers. The region is currently going implemented in a number of cities pmductivity,‘ he said. “Some people just think it will A living wage means that a per- through a public consultation in the United States, as well as the The region isstudying four main mean an increase in taxes." said son's pay after taxes is above the process to gauge interest in a living City ofCalgary, options: keep the status quo; regional (bun. lane Mitchell. poverty line. The current Ontario wage program. said Waterloo implementing the plan at the implement aliving wage for itsown Mitchell believes that the employees: pay regional staff a liv- amount it will cost to implement a l ing wage and give preference to living wage is so small in comparie :‘ trio: 49: f7; I ft . suppliers and tenders that do the son to the overall regional budget 0 . ‘ -. 9‘;Q:; WW““90 onn.com same for their employees; or that it will have a negligible effect. ~ ' "'7' ' 4252 require that all companies that do But she also believes that money 4 .’ . ‘ gift" business with the region to pay a could be better spent. OWN 1.999.200‘3 V «#43 living wage. “The way things are going. i -‘ also,“ 7. 3 There will be a public meeting don't think we should use that , ‘_"' My? _ , in the spring to give residents a money for a living wage." Mitchell ' my: , X» chance to comment. Strickland is said. Instead. the money should go : . ' ' waiting to hear from the public to other social services such as wel- e a ll- owe fiu' before he makes up his mind. "I fare. “More and more people are I want to hear if they think this is the going to be looking to that service." right public policy for the region to she said - I I March just I an WUM'TMVEIOIEAM‘IETYFETOUKE ave 8 ' . , I The Universi- . CORPORATE BONDS. w of Waterloo ( \ Weather Station ; V When you want I steady flow reports ‘ha: ' , . ‘ ofincoine. it's hard not to .V . 7 Marc}! was_ a A like bonds from Mmulifc ’ - m°mh W11“ ‘ Financial. both average a ”.4? a" . temperatures a '3: 5 . and precipita» a . Inn-red paidoemiannually “on ,= The month ’ ' “I!“ by 55?? AN started off cold. ‘ ' wmmm.mhmmmmvmmmmm but thatwasoffl i ‘. i , mlwumbmtnhmnmmmmlhm set by lots Of mumm,mmumunmmmmmmm _ . mnmmmmwmmV-ummmn days With dou- mwmmmdmm . _ , bledig'thighsto ’ ‘Coll or visit your Iced Errand-I Advice today put the overa” O lid-AN.- “WW9 Emper- ancialAtMsor ature 0.85‘C '\- sumac-am above average. sPEC'AL BUY smszmm 21:5 Most of the . “u”- precipitation I ‘ ’9888 519M came in the first ' T" s; :2“ half of the g a.“ _ ”NW . . mm.- we. month. in total gw “‘ hi5}, . 79 mm fell for @111 . i ‘_; ‘- . 3.: l .’ U the month "M“ ones whichwasin the i; average range. . 4'. if? ‘ ‘ " . . ‘ it“ cf} ‘ we“ a ‘sl’tu’u 5‘" i. l ‘ ‘ # , _ i m. 7 _ , . 22888 , 7. v.“ / . y . ~~ . . ‘ ~ ‘ 1 r e . _ “I“. 0 V .0 Id ' . "(i ' l ‘ ”3w? , , rig} ' ' ' . . ‘ ‘ . a 13% ~ 21m. ,- 3 ‘ segssygr 2. ”if; - A if? i ‘ ” ' . l . t , , 3 ‘4 r i _ rm . a” I: “W" a! ".3 g 5â€"" . 12;;3gg_fg:l / It i . v‘ .v ; ;.‘ . . at," . t ‘1 _ Meta-1 , ._‘ : , ' I“ .V , _ mi “its... Hunk; , k C £5. in . , v; c 3 ’ j 3“,? g. :71 .1 5.. ,V i g . a .1 ' 1r: , .. ' * ' . N" 3‘ Tif: in l 4.5; i f . l, ,. , *' :3 t ' at? .. s ‘ - ". ' ms. in: 1W$f."’i A") ' ‘3 :' 3“ I ; r, a . j - . . j ”a?“ 9g;- "3‘ 9 W. ' . a .1 19" 15.. .:..§» . 2/ ._ J 39» .5 ’ . ~ ,. s Q a: 5' Cam M at... 3:1... . _, m “a.-. RE: i l i