Ontario Community Newspapers

Waterloo Chronicle (Waterloo, On1868), 1 Oct 2008, p. 3

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

WW" 7,777,, 7 7 , “All ill t it I t‘tiittiNit LE - Wednesday (umber 1,100“ - 3 The end Of Waterloo . . . u . 0 Citizens for Better Government proposes a one-tier model for mumapal government I‘i , ‘ ’ -. x . j i ; '1 think we'll ./ i/ ‘\ Community groups - ‘ ~ have to gauge " ; ow \ not interested l ; it what the ‘\_ j ‘2‘ m (p , f Be h _ - I, ,» - - » ‘i. .5 e litizeris or tier Government ave ' ' ’ pllbllC has [0 , '1 f ”a. f heard and responded to Cambridge's (“W say. The” i; ‘ 15mg“)? . f4 WWMS‘IZ‘LN cents about joining a megarcity. ’ r” I ’ T > ‘ pi V o: s Now it's time for them to hear Wtiterloo‘s. It 8 If” e 0 _ “10‘4” I mount,» \ according to the Waterloo Community have some ,,- it“? ‘ “ '-“" \7 “WW“- ' [he council. which represents neighbour- SOTI 0f vâ€"- ; '4 I ’1 ’ :\ W- » - a, hood groups and community associations in plebISCIK’ or ‘ ‘ “’6‘“ 0‘3» T‘ . “my“ 3) the city. is critical of the (1380's conclusions n tomsmv WHEN“) K r \ and is speaking out about the possibility of Brenda I'llallolran referendum. . a; \ k V r joining with Kitchener and Cambridge. -‘ ’4qu "m” "0 'w‘ WJLMOTV _. \ / ’ l m "I think they‘re way underestimating the :‘ We " \ . I ~ expenses of amalgamation," said Benton “You have [0 5:. . ' \ ,r r- or / leong, the group's vice~presidenr ‘ ‘ ,' ' / ‘\ 6r ! . The WCC invited Jim Erb and his group to .1 remember . NYCHENER s eak ata eneral meetin lastvearl \ ,‘ P 8‘ 8 . that / f The participants were passionate in their r 4 A. - WWQKu l ._:,__.__,,_ _ ~ views. but most neighbourhood associations ‘ - - even/flung has “ “w ‘ “ "’ I came out opposed to the plant A y . been forced I " ‘ ‘ ‘1 "We heard loud and clear that the comr ‘ p - mmsmp munity is against this." said Tim (bland. the f ’. Zolhe region, Wm” 33.;ch _,_ .. a} 'l group's president. . “I no one IS I ' ‘ r‘ ’- "We were unsure of the end result of this. it . . . ‘ rm ' Is it for Kitchener to annex Waterloo? What is ‘ YQ/ examining i- - - â€" â€" â€" â€" - â€" '-â€"' ~ thqend result? 8 how well Bi'Gnu; MACDONALD Woolwich joining together 7W9 were left scratchingour heads." _ the re - on is (y {filirnnicleSlajf the final solution would be for all the ”BS: has suggest“! that neighbour Doug Craig g1 ,, the municipalities but Cambridge to hOOd 39*“?(‘3‘5095 WOUId he more WWW?" Mayor ()denlhrldgF working. The (Zitizens for Better (i0Vt‘l’lilTlt‘l‘ll amalgamate. under a stngle~tier structure and b? able l“ released its final report on the ”This should tend to satisfy int-in Dan‘C‘Pa“3 more inthe political NWT“- . . ' “Unless the potential amalgamation of \V'ziterloo bers of (Iamhridge council who have ‘ Bl” [gong d095m understand how Wm" . region into one municipality last voiced strong opposition (to amulga “3m W1“ be more “CC-“ml" 'f the number s .- 3" province clearâ€" week. "WNW“; up, said. of ridings in the city is decreased. ‘ [V says they (lvt't the past three years the group .v\t the press conference held last ”Wt“ Obit“ ‘0 ”‘9 W”P‘"‘§‘d community ,1 :4 ' ‘ . ‘ believes it has found strong support week. the (INK; was critiCi/ed hs ””1"“15 They want '0 “WWW" ’W'thm” >1 ‘2 ‘ h ‘ have (1 11’1” {0 for ariialgamation initiatives in most sortie audience members for misrep hood és‘f’ummn“ but WV" ”‘9'“ ““ Will ‘ r - \ proceed, this [5 ofthe region said chair lim lirb, resenting results from community ““1!"le WWW 331d: \\_, , . . . l:rh did concede that the will for meetings to make it seem like there is . Members would go I" ‘1 "W?“"Fl and ‘ My . 4' ‘ .l [“31 a [Dr of thange iii (timhridge isn‘t very strong, mort- support for the initiative than m"? *1” that doesnt "‘93” anything m” b“ ’ . \ ’ diSCllSSiOII. [4/8 and thus the group presented mo .it‘tiiully‘t-xistsiii the region (“mt ()slandsaidr ‘ 9‘ ' more options that see that citv But l rh believes that while tilitec ”99159 91“""0m‘d ('l‘m’fl'li‘m“ that ., st ‘ need (I Clear removed from the equation tors were vocal, the quiet mayoritv the (“firmly ”f the community " In WWW” . . ,4 _ , , ., _ ,7 ,, ., . , ,‘ , v . ’ lama amation ‘ . 31 “ll 0," ()ur prtftrtntt is still for a south wants to stt (hang: in goveriiintnt, ” g Ken Selling g, fr ,, tit-r model," lirli said “l‘rom the begin "At the community (mums. those Much ”f the data '0 had ”P that ”4”” RFX‘OM’F’W" the pml’mCe- hing. we have felt a singletier muniti most opposed to any kind of change “a“ gathered from “WU“ groups 1h?” ”W polity is the most advantageous were done vocal, but certainly did not (1‘3“ held ”V" ”‘9 W“ "'3‘” ”l ‘0 x option" represent the majority of t‘iti/ens In “I would “k“ I“ “'1' “in” W?” ”l ”1““ i The (ll-BU laid out its vision tor ti our focus groups and ill public speak “3““ KTOUPK ”‘0‘“ [W’Pk‘ “mm b“ hand ‘; ' ‘1 “We're moving niegarcity. with 26 wards comprising ing events, there was strong support tilt'kt’d to make the numbers 100k Km'dt‘ -' ‘ , . the area. Under the group's plan, eat it for it siiiglertier model of local govt-m ()sland 53", y . In the ”g,” ward would have a councillor sup mentr" hesaid. ()sland "Willi" “”1 “1”“Wh”“"i”"*t”"dl 7 t 'r ' , ported by an appointed group of ( run [he group believes that no rt'it'rcn Kiln“a““" “l all. , ' ' t (1.1 ectlo 1' we tiiiitiitv members which would deal door is required to make a decision (Hmhndlll' council hi“ MT" “H ”H“ F.- just [101W to With issues such as noist‘ livid“- tom \Hu‘t‘ voter turnout is so low iii inunit ';Pl‘"5"d an: hes heard only ”Pl"“'““” l" l ‘ ‘ ‘ .‘ ,‘ , _. .v r. v . ,. , . ' lariiiit tscitv ? ( , 5 r 5 plaints and sign \dl’lle ( s, ip.ilint s at ross the “gm” ‘“ P , _ I 1.1,“ H P I,” lllt‘ settind option that (Ii my pn- lalected politicians will he the tines . “henlllll. "Md" l" presentation l” ”W IS (10"? the sciitt-d creates five municipalities, who Will make or lireak this issue V“ ( v kmln'm'l community groups got 1 14/ r100 With the townships of Wellt‘slev. at t ortliiig to the group splint. Wmd “f the ”“Tlmli and “WW?” ”P l“ “W “ (It? ,, Wilmot and North ”unifries and the [he (ii-Rh believes they have done ”W” opposition i ‘ region any. (lily of (.arnhridgt' remaining on its their part in pushing the issue for It all 193:" (island to one ll”"""’” WW)" 1 (,arl71ehr own, with the cities of Waterloo and ward Now its tip to the politicians to wants m"? f VIM" "(MN/""14" Kitchener, as well as the township of decide l rh said. 1 l l III-IIII-IIIIIIII-IIIIIII...I... 1 ; , ,. ‘ T» 30 WEBER ST. N. WATERLOO 0" 51957464258 WWWSNUGGEHSFUHNITUHECOM ' $3,511: ~~ if,“ 7 ‘ ‘ ‘ a, ‘t ‘ ‘3 m -‘-|> I i . ' ‘ ' - AL. . it - A n A n ‘

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy