The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Create vendor qguidelines: task force ‘City Council should adopt a regulation approach to outdoor vendors, .fi‘ a report of the task force Itthin i cset: fntmepted m s eptiiceme vending but allows caseâ€"byâ€"case exemptions by council. . wflmm*wâ€"..‘d fry wagon in uptown Waterico has mlfl exemption. Other applications have been by council until a vending policy is adopted. Aflkmwm&emâ€"nfifiMh been set for Nov. 18. "The disadvantages of the status quo option include a subdued form of street life â€"ie lack of celebration," 132nd Year No. 42 noses Monday night and passed a motion giving residents of apartâ€" ments and condominiums a reâ€" bate on the taxes they pay for garbage pickup services they don‘t receive from the city. Folâ€" lowing over two hours of often lowing over tw« itizen pr me.eunflo propesal which r e rebate not be given. Residents of properties with , council overturned a staff Garbage rebate scheme OK‘d : atmosphere if the chief recomm Vending Task Force is accepted. Wednesday, October 21, 1987 more than six dwelling units will now receive a full rebate of municipal taxes . They will, howâ€" ever, have to continue disposing of their own garbage. city policies with respect to garâ€" bage collection and landfill costs were accepted by council. Residents of multifamily units posal taxes, yet had to dispose of their garbage through contract tions, which reâ€"affirmed present notes report. "Based on the recent requests for J-mumuxuâ€"--u&- “vufiu“hfl.(hlubm&n wâ€"wel-bmmu-u and desires Lastly, the prohibition approach subjects Council to pressures to grant exemptions without criteria or a policy to evaluate such decisions, The task force rejected the laissez faire approach because of "the possibhility of on and offâ€"street (sidewalk, cmm)w.;mhafim.m,. negative impact on aesthetics caused by poor quality and paying less business tax, loss of parking spaces in prime locations (Uptown, Kingâ€"University) and a higher From the 1960‘s until May 1986, the residents were then given a $10 yearly rebate from the city. Gordon Lemon, the Director of staff had calculated the average cost per household for garbage renewal in Waterioo at $28.61 the current system, returning to a household pays the actual cost of garbage pickup, and the tax credâ€" it system, where multiple unit dwellers would get a rebate for all taxes collected for garbage. Leâ€" mon said staff preferred continuâ€" ing the current system, but would Rudy Voge! of the Waterloo Region Apartment Management Association asked, "Has the city a moral right to keep the money it charges for services it does not We without the loss of control assumed in the laissezâ€"faire option. The regulatory approach allows for a great io 4 remiue mtens m totel tack of requiation at Possible regulatory criteria included controlling the appearance of carts, restricting locations and limiting licences to Waterioo Region residents. The task force was composed of three members of city staff and two representatives of the Uptown Waterloo Business Improvement Area. It was chaired by Rob Deyman, a city planner a tax credit system as When it came time to celebrating Oktoberâ€" fest, no one did it better than the staff and youngsters from the Mutual Life Day Care Centre who organized their own miniâ€"paraâ€" de and marched up to the information Tent at King and William waving homemade toys and mrinngktoberfect gear. Now how‘s that for a cultural event! _ Beveriey Conquest photo of competition with City concessions in parks." regulation approach, favored by the task force result in an increase in street/outdoor activity We PARADE PALS expecting justice. We have the right to the same service as any other citizen in this community." James Canell of Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 7,000 of Waterloo‘s 23000 houseâ€" holds are victims of discriminaâ€" tion by dwelling type." He added, "you cannot morally, d nminne Aupcruminbcicn nepnat an ever growing number of taxâ€" payers and residents of the City of (Continued on page 6) the residents of