The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

A. B. seems to have felt quite sat- isfied that he had accomplished his diflicult task when he very innocent- ly put the question thus : " A new heart instead of an old heart. is a change of heart.” But this is not stating the question properly. He has to prove that the change makes the old heart a new heart. God promises in the Scripture to give us a new heart, but he never promises to change the old heart. A. B. as- sumes what he has not proved name- ly : that God changes the natural heart into a good heart. Bishou Bald- win asserts that God’s Word does not anywhere teach what A. B. assumes. A. B’s words “ instead of ” do not .ean “ changed from.” or “ changed into.” ” A new heart ” changed from or made out of, an old heart, is es- sentially dilerent in meaning. from a new heart. instead of, an old heart. A lady is not satisfied with her old dress. She has it " done over,” to use the popular phrase. The dress is changed, but it is not a new dressâ€" ” Create in me a clean heart, OGod.” is the prayer of David in the 513: Realm. The Church teaches us to y scripturally; “ Create and make nsnew and contrite hearts. etc.” is, the new heart is the creation . It is also God’s gilt: "A 't also will I give yon.” A. Dr. Bushnell to disprove :p of Enron’s statement that A man goes into a store, carries 08 a new silk umbrella, and leaves an old cotton one in its placeâ€"he changes umbrellas, as A. B. would describe it. (or he says: " we change a thing by putting another in its place.” When the merchant detects the change, he expresses himself with considerable leeling (I don’t mean “ religious feel- ing,” the expression is vulgar be- cause it is not found in the Scripture). Under the circumstances A. B. would inter pose at once to console the mer- chant philosophically by saying. my dear lellow don’t get excited, don't you know. you have a new umbrella. The change has made it new. That’s the point! The merchant would be liable to reply. “ Hang your twisting of dictionaries and philosophy. You can’t bamboozle me. I don’t see your point.” For my enlightenment he goes to his dictionaries, and supplies us with very interesting information indeed. With great care he elaborates what the word change means, or may mean. It may seem unkind to destroy in a low minutes what he may have spent hours, or even days in so carefully working out. However. let me first take his illustrations. He asks with evident delight “ What does Reader do when he changes his clothes ?” Why ! he changes his cluthes. of course. But it does not follow that the clothes he puts on are new clothes. They may be old clmhes. “ The change” does not make them new. If he occasionally puts on new clothes. It does not follow that they are new because of the change. They were new belore the change was made. “ A King dismisses his min- isters ” is anOther of his illustrations. When the King dismisses one set of ministers. they cease to exist, as ministers. So he cannot be said to change what has no existence. He calls another set of ministers. That is, he creates or makes them miniso ters. He does not change the one set into the other. Let us now ex- amine his old boots illustration.â€" The old boots can never be changed. into new.boots. If A. B. can changel old boots into new boots he will soon make his fortune. He will have a veritable “ corner ” on boots. \Vhat does his illustration of a change of residence amount to? It does not make the residence a new house. The change does no'. make the man new surely. won't Boply to A. B): Lotto: of August 7th. Etc. Dun. Simâ€"It. in quite manila” ‘ht A. B. (on the applicuion of his own whips, which I usefl on lgim‘ in .) letter oi July 10th. His wincinc under the severe cutigation admin- btoied 0 him. in both “conscious nod maniieet” to use the words of hi. very careful writer. But he con- Dole: himself, as a whipped boy some- times does. by calling the one who administers the unwelcome punish- ment, had. or unpleasant names. It would he " a dip into the vulgar tongue ” for him to saw I was with- out “ Religious feeling.” As a phil- oOOpher he would not use the phrase though Hume and other unquesfioned writers of goal English did. They were only secular writers you know! Asa Presbyterian he is very much afraid of the ward " feeling used in connection with religion. In his let- ter lie male the distinct insinuation that the exwessiun " Religious feel- "a dip into the vulgar tongue ?” In getting out of one mistake he falls into another. In the future let him learn not to make the Prayer-Book his jokeobookâ€"He seems to be con- tinued from the severe handling some of his statements received that I need "a change of heart.” ButI suppose he is quite recovered from his soreness by this time so I shall make no further reference to the column of pouting abuse with which he begins his letter. were only secular writers you know! Ala Presbyterian he is very much alraid of the wcrd " feeling ” used in connection with religion. In his let- ter he made the distinct insinuation that the expression " Religious feelâ€" in; ” was vulgar. but when confront- ed with the proof that it was good English, having been used by the host writers. he tries to creep out of his hole by saying, I objected to the use of ” Religious feeling "' on exactly the same grounds, that is, that it is not used in Scripture. But is any ex- pression not found in the Scriptures THAT RELIGIOUS DISCUSSION. Religious feeling." A Dr he would not use t] I) Home und other :1an '9 of cool English did mly secular writers yo Presbvterian he is vet eling.” As a phil- not use the phrase other unquesdoned Lnglisb did. They My second remark is that the met- aphysical refining is not the work of Churchmen, but of modern Presby- terians and others. The Church has not adopted into her standards the novel technicalities of modern philo osOphy. I assert that the Church does hold to all the great practical doctrines and truths of the Gospel. though untrammeled by metaphysical theories. The doctrine of a sincere repentance of all sinâ€"the doctrine of a true and living faith in Jesus Christ as the only meritorious cause of par- don lor sin ; the doctrine of a renov- ation of the soul, by the Holy Spirit ; the doctrine of a new and holy life, according to the commandments and ordinances of God; these practical truths are everywhere set forth in the Church’s standards, and speak out in all her living voices with no uncertain sound. My third remark is, that the clause is too sweeping in its extent. He tells us that “ a change of heart must take place in every soul that is to be saved,” and that it is “absolutely necessary to eternal salvation.” What about infants ‘3 Can they ex- perience this change of heart? \Vell, if they cannot, how can they be sav- ed ? A. B. positively asserts that it is absolutely necessary in every soul that is to be saved. That must include the infant. But it cannot ap- ply to every soul, if infants are to be excluded. In one at his former let- ters he tells us. “ the children of be- lieving parents are born within the Church. and hence .do not need the the convertingâ€"the turning from the worldâ€"necessary to those born with. out the Churchfl’ This is a moat re- markable statement for a champion at his Church to nah-It‘lleomrary to Scripture. to our experience, and My firsr. remark on this very strongly worded homily is that he is too free in passing judgment on my condition before God. Assuming the office of a judge is a tremendous re- sponsibility! It is something which God does not permit. It is an office for which he has no qualification. It does not say much for his “ religious feeling.” It certainly does not prove him to be a person of fine feeling. And as to my prospects when stand- ing before the Great White Throne. they will be better as a humble, sin- cere member of the Body which Christ founded. than they would be. if I had rejected the organization He founded, and tried to get to Heaven in my own way. I am perfectly sat- isified that the old Ark of Salvation which has come safely through many wintry seas. and the storms of ages. and which He intends to last to the end of time. is infinitely safer than any of the new boats, modern in their construction, and gaudily decked out to attract the popular eye. In ac- cordance with his old promise the Captain is, and will always remain in the old Boat. If He should seem to some t have forsaken Her, we do not bar r such an unworthy thought of Him. He is not unequal to Her safety, and our Salvation. It is in- finitely safer to stay in the old Boat. A. B. becomes somewhat compli- mentary to me and warns me against the exercise of my " metaphysical ” powers. Dear me ! “ But he does me grand !” After this undeserved compliment I surely cannot find it in my heart to hit him hard. But to proceed he says: “ Reader instead of metaphysically refining the mean- ing out of existence, had better dio rect his energies to secure such a change for himself, and then to con- vince others, of its absolute necessity to eternal salvation.” " thoroughly unscriptural, etc.” It is of some significance that A. B’s. phrase, does not appear in any stand- ard. of any Church in Christendom, for more than 1500 years. “ For with the heart man believeth uuto righteousness ” “ The heart ” means the organ or instrumentâ€"be- lieving is the act of that organ or in- strument. It is quite needless to multiply examples, so we pass on. After a few observations A. B. adds: I do not suppose the Bishop of Huron was in his mind when he wrote it But if it applies to Reader at all in this connection, it must, for a strong. er reason, apply to the Bishop also, because while Reader asserted that the phrase ‘° change of heart ” is not found in the Scriptures, the Bishop makes the same statement, and goes much further, strongly and vigorous- ly asserting that the phrase is also " If theologians who love the extern- als of religion. more than the real core of the Gospels ” (Reader would interject the remark here that it is to him inexplicable ! that the Apostles and inspired writers. don’t seem to know anything about this ” real core of the Gospel ”â€"Nor does it appear that the early Christians discovered it ) give explanations that do not explain. and befog inStead of enlight- en, on their own shoulders be the re- sponsibility.” To whom does all this solemn warning properly apply ? of course it was intended for Reader. “ what saith the Scripture? “ Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with all thine heart. etc. Love is the act of the heart not the heart, in this pass- age. The heart is the organ, or in- strument by which the act is to be performed. I don’t see how love can be made to mean the heart itself in this passageâ€"Let us take another: The omission may have a significance. “ Hence ” says the quotation, so much is said about a change of heart “ in the Gospel? Now that is the point we dispute. We say, it is not a fact. that neither in the GoSpels. nor in any other part of the Scrip- tures does the phrase. or the thing. occur. And the quotation ends with: ” a. man’s love is the same as a man’s heart.” Now how shall we test this conclusion? By the dictionaries. or by the Scripture? Let us enquire. Iifioenee. to the teaching of his «In Church- tion, .0 Calvin and Wesley whose teaching I of heart give below will correct him-Calvin t is the says: “ It inclear that infants. who it is not are saved. must first be regenerate. Gospels. For they have a corrupt nature from no Scrip- their mother’s womb, they must be re thing, purged of it befsre entering God’s ds with : Kingdomnvhere nothing entereth pol- ; a man’s luted or defiled.” Infants, Calvin test this contends: “must be capable of re- tries. or generation. though they are not cap- enquire, able of faith ; else they could not re- “ Thou a ceive purgation from inward corrup- avith allf tion.” Again. “For God regenerating he act of; us in Baptism grafts us into the his pass- i fellowship of His Church. and makes n. or in-( us His Children by adoption. John is to be: Wesley Ll) his treatise on Baptism love can . says: " By Baptism we are admitted itself inv into the Church and consequently are inother: relieveth 5: heart ” entâ€"he- an or in- 3dless to .' the Church, or into Heaven, [”153 Oil. B. adds: 3extern- the real 3r would Lt it is to Apostles : ' require to issue a morning and even- seem to real core I appear scoyered' ' the Body of Christ.” ‘ation. made members of Christ its Head; for by one Spirit we are all Baptized into One Body; namely, the Church, And again he “ In the ordinary way there means of entering into By water. then, as a means, the water of Baptism. we are regenerated or born again. whence it is called by the Apostles the washing of regener- ” If Reader were to write such the Chronicle would says: is no other words as these. ing edition for a week to contain all the denunciations which A. B. would pour out on him. Those " simple honest folk” among Presbyterians who feel the need of a Scriptural Liturgical service have my most heartfelt sympathy. I lately came across the following remarkable passage in the writings of a Scotch Presbyterian minister: “ It must be admitted that a Scottish congregation is hopelessly in the hands of the of- 'ficiating minister for its worship. The congregation’s sole security lies in the good sense, good taste, and devout feeling of the minister. If he be a fool. he can make the entire service as foolish as himself. Col- ridge once remarked ‘ that he never felt the sublimity and sweetness of the Anglican Liturgy. as on return- ing to his parish Church from a so- journ in a country place in Scotland. where he had been doomed' to listen a few Sundays to the extempore ef- fusions of a Scotch minister.’ ” A. B. will acknowledge that this exper- ience did not occur in " districts and unsettled communities. in which there was no settled pastor-â€"districts in which services are conducted by ordinary unlettered peOple.” Entering the Anglican Church for worship, the reverent. and sensitive soul is saved this source of exquisite pain. The worshipper is sure that the words spoken to God will be the choicest and the best-wwords grave and reverent. and solemn---words stately and musical and beautifulâ€" words that to him who knows their history, come down to us through many long and eventful centuries, charged with a thousand memories, of saint. and martyr. and missionary, and struggle for right and truth. And as life goes on do not the old pravers grow dearer. do they non more and more as it were, exhale the subtile and delicious fragrance of hallowed associations. They have been with us in joy and sorrm'v ; they have helped to make uswhat we are. --they are almost a part of ourselves. For a man in middle or advanced life. who I)“ “I! sense or tpprobhtion, of their beauties to be left to the mercy: It is a suflicient reply to A. B’s fling at the Church and Churchmen. in which he indulges even before the Great White Throne, to say that the good Churchmnn must be a good Christian. Indeed he must be from the very nature of the questionâ€"the best Cbrietien. When men intensely anxious to be saved asked the Apostles, what shall we do to be saved? What reply did the Apostles give? Did they use A. B’s. "real-core-of the Cowles” re- ply? Ye must have a change of heart. No! \Ve never heard of such a replyâ€"They always exhorted men to repent, believe, etc. Now is not A. B. satisfied with the Apostles’ replies? Why does he want to add or substitute his “ real-core-of the GOSpels ?” Why does he want to read into the Gospel ” aphrase which the apostles never usedâ€"a phrase not found in any of the Apostolical Fathers, early Christian writers, or in fact, in any part of the Christian Church for so many ages? Then again he confounds “ a change of heart” with regeneration. Calvin says: "God by regenerating us in Baptism, etc.” Calvin’ dld not be- lieve that “ the children of believing parents are born within the Church.” Such a statement leads to PelaOgian- ism. The Toronto Professor is ex- ercising a bad influence on A. B’s theology. By the way A. B. recently betrayed a new interest in his friend, the Professorâ€"_” A friend in need is a friend indeed.” But to return. Dr. Bushnell says: “ We hold that Baptized children are members of the Church. * * * There is no reason why a principle of Divine life may not be imparted in infancy. as well as after sin has hardened the sensibility, and bronzied the soul in guilt”â€"I need only remind you of Wesley’s words on this point. If children are made members of the Church by baptism, then, surely un- baptized children are not members of the Church, and cannot be said to be born within her. It seems that A. B, does not know how he gets into the Presbyterirn Churchâ€"Of course he was baptized in infancy, but he does not seem to have realized the value of his inheritance by adoption. He certainly did not become a mem- ber of the Presbyterian Church at his birth when he first saw the light of dayâ€"He was not born a Presbyterian. He may not die one. May we not thank God that Eng- lish Speaking Christians of every Dr. Fleming concludes with an ap- peal. “ I ask that the men and we. men who gather together for Divine Service in Presbyterian public as- semblies be permitted to take part in the public worship of God to a gram. er extent than at present." ' It is again well objected by Dr. Fleming, that in extempore prayer. the officiating minister addresses the Deity in words which up to the mom- ent they were uttered are unknown to any single occupant of the pews. The people are simply listners, the Iprayers cannot be called in any cor- “ rect sense the prayer of the congrega- tion. “ It would be as correct to call the sermon, the sermon of the congregation.” ”Joint prayer which amongst all denominations of Chris- tians is the declared design of coming together, is prayer in which all join. and not that which one alone in the congregation conceives and delivers, and of which the rest are merely hearers.” When we turn to another part of the Service. the Service of Praise, we find a recognition of set forms of words, The earnestness. the feeling, and devotion with which a hymn is sung, is not diminished but increased by familiarity. The pathos and pleading of such hymns as " Rock ofl Ages." and " Jesus Lover of My Soul.” is not diminished by frequent singing any more than the joyful ex- ultation of “All Hail the Power of Jesus Name.” St. Paul places the two acts of worshipâ€"prayer and praiseâ€"on the same plane. " I will pray with the Spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also !” If we have set forms of Sacred verse inl Psalms, paraphrases. and hymns. ‘ why should we n0t have set forms of Prayer? ” It would seem to be a calm common sense conclusion that a book of prayers is required forcthe Public Worship of God in the Pres- byterian Church of Canada.” Dr. Fleming states the objections to extempore prayers as follows: “ Extempore prayer, pure and simple, unless by a rarely gifted person, in- spired by the Holy Spirit, is apt to abound in crude unpremedltttted thoughts, and imperfect utterances.” If, as is doubtless frequently the case, prayer is carefully prepared during the week, it then ceases to be extem- pore, and " from his place in the nul- pit the minister recites the thoughts and words already rehearsed in private,” They might as well be written “ and placed in the hands of every person in the congregation in order that all might join the officiat- ing minister in- the common petition addressed to the Great Author of our being.” Very pertinent is the fol- lowing question : “ If we feel called upon to petition Parliament, are we not extremely careful to have our wants expressed in well chosen words? If a Royal Prince, aGovero nor General, or other high personage comes amongst us whom we wish to address, what course do we follow? 13 it not customary, to introducea capable personage, or a committee of persons to draw up with care and de- liberation the address in htting terms? If we are so careful in thus arranging our words so that they shall not be wanting in order, pro- priety and respect, how much more needful is it when a body of Chris- tian peeple approach the infinite Deity that they should present their deepest thoughts in words fitly chosen, and not leave all to the im: who of the moment.” l was informed several years ago by those who professed to know whereof they spoke that Liturgical services were then regularly conduct- ed in Queen’s University Kingsmn. Those services were not ” conducted by ordinary. unlettered peOpIe.” The professors and students were among the most intelligent members of the Presbyterian Church in Canada The diStinguished Chancellor of this Un- iversity, Dr. Fleming in an address to the theological alumni undertook " to consider the merits of each sys- tem and ascertain on which side the weight of advantage proponderates,” that is of an extempore or liturgical service. After an able and exhaust- ive address he came to this conclu- sion; ” It would seem to be a calm common sense conclusion that a book of prayer is required for the Public Worship of God in the Presbyterian Church in Canada.” This is the proof A. B. required me to furnish namely, that a liturgical services would be of benefit to the Presbyter- ian Church. and crudities of public exteutpure prayer, would be like tearing the old peasant from the village where he was born. and planting him down among strangers. And we can im- agine such a one coming back to the beloved old prayers, after, perhaps. years of enforced exile; how his heart would beat and his face flush with joy; it would be like the rec newing of youth, like stepping from a day in January to a day in June! Compare this frame of mind with that of a leading Presbyterian divine on the eve of his entrance into the English Church and how marked is the contrast! His own words will best describe it: “ To be losing my time and patience and to be injuring my devotio: al taste and temper with the “gifts” of the hrethern in a suipid prayer meeting. when I might he waited toward heaven in the sub- lime strains of a holy liturgy * * “lien by a single step I might enter the larger libertv of a Church which breathes. and believes, and prays. and praises, as she did when her» aens. Ignatius, and I’olycarp beheld her glory, and the noble army of martyrs died for her as the pure spouse of Uhrist-â€"all this had now become too great for me to bear.” SHOP open every afternoon. All REPAIRING promptly nnd prop- erly attended to. Pumps of all Kinds. GarafranSu-eet, -â€" Durham,Ont W. D. CONNOR OUR BUGGIES AND \VAGGONS are bought for cash in carload lots, and our prices are away down. Call and see our goods before purchasing. The Best of Everything. Deering Harvester Co.’s Tilling Tools and Harvesting Machines. Wilkinson Plow CO.’8 Flows and Steel Rollers. UNDERTAKING PRICES CUT. Also a First Class Hearse always in connection. Em- balming a speciaity. name are more and more coming back to the principle: of Prayer Book Worship? The remarkable Presby- terian Book of Common Prayer. com- piled ty the devout and scholarly Dr. Shields, who has since become a Churchman. the earnest efiorts of Drs. Hopkins and Hitchcock also among the Presbyterians. and other like minded men in other denomina- tions. are a few among the many in- dications that the prejudice against Liturgical worship is rapidly dying awayâ€"There has been a sudden wak- ing up to the fact. that hymns. which are for the most part nothing but rhythmetical prayers, are as distinct- lv liturgical. as the Litany or the Psalter; and if it be right to sing liturgical prayers in verse. it can hardly be wrong to say, or sing them in prose. Snowball, Chatham and Milo ver- Walker WaggOng in carload lots. See them. Bell and Berlin Pianos and Or- gans to please all. Raymond and New Williams Sewing Machines. Dawswen’s Chums. Wash. ing Machines and Wringers. United States Cream Sep- erators always on hand. NEW PUMPS AND REPAIRS. DRILL, CURB, RE-CURB, PRESSQUBB UUID, uu-Vuuu, - ”_v..-- _ WELLS. Allordars taken at the old :33. near McGowan’s Mill will be promptly at tended to. ALL WORK GUARANTEED at “Live and let live" PRICES. McClar-y’s and Buck’s Stoves and Ranges. Pumps. Furn Iture . . . Galvanized and Iron Pipâ€" ing; Brass, Brass Lined and Iron Cylinders. almerston Carriage Cafe and McKee’s Buggies bought for cash in carload lots. I BEG LEAVE TO INFORM MY GUS. 'I‘OMERS and the public in general that I am prepared to furnish m. N... Uni Walnut Written Content- If you have transgreued against the laws of “t“ 79' must Infler. Self abuse, later excrsoc’s and pr vat. diuue. luv. wrecked thousands of promising lives. Treat with scientific hFS‘Ua‘" and be cured. Avoid quake. E. A. Mac)“. 0‘; Toledo.“ o: “ . d 3 b3 hobit and at 19 contracted diction: diceue.’ I uééiwim 352:; 3.11333 110 3” promieed to cum me. The ‘ m . ' ’ no.9, “d I.“ h , I had guyen 1: 13:35:23“; £15131“; ‘1' '04 no to consult Dal} 162%? 3%???“ cmcd him. {tor akf'wtlcalled on them, and Dr. Kennedy 'ac‘reed to cure me or II! hollow Method Treatment for six weeks I felt like a new m o “:11. Txlfiniu coated. wormy nine disarm an". new .(fonggf' hair I was ized. y Dr. leaned! tad "com or a. flu” heart.” -Etlztegsed. Cur.- _Onlnu.. 9:32 {92.351.32.39 33.23....“ we trout and Curo' Syphl'lEâ€"afatu: ‘iai‘fo‘éti? Eggh'oibno. Btrlctnro Count 3.." ’ “Inc! and number 01:34.?!“ °" W. w“"°'“’ K uture, you and privu promising and b. ca Toiedo. u; Pumps from $2 upward. That is sure to mease can always be purchased here. C. McKINNON Mnuufwturor of And Dealer in â€" GEORGE WHITMORE. DURHAM Cor. Item:- Au. and 8h JACOB KRESS. W. 0. COMM. You r9 truly, READER BBICK COTTAGE IN A DESIR' 3N0 Iomlitv on Bruce Street. 1 acre. ”M "’0‘“. two nannies mood cellar. hard ”a '0“ “hr. lovers! bearing fruit trees. 8001‘ M0“. etc. For particulars apply :0 MRS. A. E. Hlxn. Amt lâ€"tf. Durham- u 'hipongrohyont tear Holstein. cum forcible dwelling. goodbLnk barn. nrchard. P???“ to ”“001. post office and Railway Aura-t 2â€"11. Station. Apply. July 29th 02. vâ€" vâ€" â€"â€"vâ€"v vâ€"v â€"v “02. GOOâ€"Bl Horse apparently seven or :umtbyu" m. The Owner mayhave ° YPTOW Draperty and payinfl 9‘ DOM“. ROBERT HILLIS. D the Undoraiaaed. Lot 6. Concession 2. Enrol-roux“ ogpbout the 4th day of Jul}: “-A- House and Lot for Sale. £1. fimyment. Lots 24 and 2.3. 13 conces- snou. Qentick. Grey County. half a mile from school. a mile and a quarter from church and post oflice and a mile frum ww- mnll. 145 acres cleared. )(D acres in good state of cultivation: remainder pasture land. 50acresgoud herdwood bush and I; arres coder“? orchards, trees in full Marin-lg. There Is I bank burn on stone tuundatmu 70:45. lbrick veneered home, :2 “ellsqu propert and one never-failing spring In rat. ell fenced. For further particul. are npply to July 2nd.â€"6. EING LOT 53. CON. 3. SOUTH Durham Road. Township of (ileuelg. 50 acres under stood cultivaticm. There is a neat brick house. Post barn and stables. well gnd_pm_np, small o_rchard. (*mnveuiem Or it this office. July 1, 190.2. 11 Street. the property uf Browne. The home cuntaim coveniently situated. and quitv make an excellent boarding 1, particulars apply to July 10th. 1901. P 013, containing 100 acresâ€"90 acres ceared and in first class state of culti- vation. well fenced. well watered, With good frame dwelling and good ulli build- ings. Frame barn 54x64 on stuue mund- ation. another frame barn 25x50. Good bearing orchard of nearly 1(1) ll'eefi, will be sold reasonable and on easy terms. Fur particulars apply to the owner, GEORGE LAMB. Or at this oflioe. Dafter. Mich. to school, church and East. orhce.~ "For price and further particu rs apply to Jan. 20th. April 1. 50 1 seven buildings 10H 0 of Albert street, being part Also buildingolots on tho r {ran street. being part of 1 Now is your tigne to sec... For further particulars am April 30th.» 'tf. chase desirable builuing 1 d0 W8" ‘0 take A look at .1011); A. Inn of subdivision at Park J.« Four, north of Chester street, in ernment Survey, of the Tun“ .,1 Plan can be seen at. the ofiim «'2 ford. Durham, or at the emu. «1.2" ' signed. For further particular» N THE TOWN TRAYED TO THE PREMISES OF 001) 100 ACRE FARM, TOWN? NY PERSQN “7153.130 'm PER EI_NG LOT 9, cox. u. GLEN. BARGAIN ON EASY TIER MS OF HOUSE AND LOT 0N Building lots For 8 Farm Eor Sale. Building lots For Saie MRS. MARY MCNFLTY. or to D. McComuCK. JOHN MCARTHL’R. Farm For Sale. Horse Astra y. Farm fur Sale. Farm for Sale. 501' "Inner particulars apply u ARCHIBALD DAVIDSON, Clerk Divnsiuu Court ALEX. TAYLOR. Cmssun‘ For Sale. For Sale. DONALD MCCOSKER tf 11 Peter SL 'r,, lyr-pd. HRS. H. ADAMS. Holstein 1’. 1 Priceville P. 0., Out tf. tf. OI DURHAM. 0x1. Bl Varney A. W tl QUE}: . our: lam m the Ptrliamem 01 “fig Fruit. Marks Act “W! of Agriculture (““1 opportunity 81:01 W“. fruit grOWem am fl“ Dominion to meet its ”and to fulfil the-ir 0“ g. :50 public; and for a; “Of the Department ”1‘ cu informatiunal m ”d- Th“ year Some: and war-undo to the Ar: as 4 g.“ t “he W110 runs “.21 O (“9... or fl'llit “11”“er :50 is honest in his mm...“ Mtforwnrd in his ‘1“ four “I, 0‘ its claustw. '1‘ being enforced. and 2}“: f uppoiltod to execute ms h, hue been instrumei fi;. “.11 instructed 1,. duty. They are the Spry“ “013° Parliament Mu pro-Gillie“! itI judgement ‘d’ .04 fraudulem yaw who; of fruit Clesiumn M 9.0 have [men Shit-(‘1‘ V. out Vtho regulations “not. book for the ; acting honest trm ' er , “-vvâ€" pbll inlets. and of . "OMO .110 (“if (‘Olnxne Cumin from unscrllyu GUI.“ from unsm‘n} In othor words. the . w tho public of the In ”Omission agents pacrslly in Great 1-: where. that the h" linked and honesfly Boction 4. I: Very him-elf or through 1 other person. pack“ ”chum. intended moo the pICkage zr phi“ .Od indelihiq- ! in tukon from t‘m- ; is packed.â€" (o.) with the 1m in; an», and his ful; dun; (b) with the n vuricties; and (C) With a dehi; of fruit. which 5 the following six the first quality. fruit of the bacon XX; and for h mt 1y. No. 3 or .\: L guy he tccompan Animation of ma duignuion IS not or marked mow H ti. me of the saw i. used on the said Section 7. No perm o‘er. expose or lmu» n for one. unless. am Wk“ as required by Odin; mtion. Soction 6. No 1-2 rsun an o'er. expose or have ix; his for 0010, my fruit packed i Mtge. upon “hich p1 outed any designation “1 Cent! Inch fruit as of No 1 Guest, best or extra gum all.“ such fruit ('Hllaistt IN‘Q Specimens of one sound. of net! 13' uniform Si: colour for the \‘al‘iwy. 05.90. and not less. than I “It, “'00 from N‘ah. “(1 him and other defems only packed. Section 7. No person “oncxpose or have in t for “It, nny fruit 3». kaIO in “'llich NW {a “file. gives a false :-. 0f the contents of snvh it Chill be considered 'r “lath“! when more 111 M‘ 0‘ Inch fruit is .5 “.11.? in size that). or N. to, or difl’erem m V m i“! or shown surf Exoluutions of its and? “Mn than. 011 parka; naked contrary to Iiw 0‘ th. Act. Insnectms I “1‘“ the packer I \ it! ”I... plwe the “0213 W” or “(alaen mark} MOI! ” or “ falsely mark “0 Of “0 may be inumse ill! "moving the luv 1 It 'iu ho noticed Hm: o " need be mm m i m ‘3 defined to he a M: ‘b “but. of \x. i« h ~ U inspected a hen ~ “. “on. horn cm!!! “a”... with ”mm" « '0‘ moidered ‘ 1mm ‘1 ‘0‘ therefore do not H 1 ho Cranberries m i a?! 5" Dot. Ianect to Hm N: that. Manta urn hr” “I fruit they ofl'Pr t" j‘“ thir possession {n a“! Cl wrongdoer. i' my we be prose! u The principle m rum mums ulna fruit, ‘ “an fluke! t_h I: Ian: and an 88( Domin ut rvs Ml