The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Brantford Six Nations? (Continued from front page) Monture wants to see the Crown's records for the sale of the lots in the Brantford townplot. "The land was laid out in quarter-acre lots. The Crown was supposed to sell the land for 10 pounds ($40) per lot. Any sale under 10 pounds was a breach of trust. We're telling the Crown to produce its records or the surrender itself becomes questionable." Surrender number 30 was one of several that Six Nations says were not handled properly. It will get a lot of attention because it effects Brantford's central core. Compensation is not an issue in the lawsuit, which asks only for an accounting from the Crown of its activities in carrying out its trustee obligations, but the question of compensation arises. The Specific Claims Policy administrators will not displace third parties who reside on land under claim. If the claim is accepted as valid then the First Nation is compensated either financially or with lands of similar value. Monture feds the prohibitive cost of reimbursing Six Nations for the value of the city of Brantford has led the federal government to drag its feet in dealing with the claim. Monture says the surrender was originally entered into by Six Nations because squatters on the Haldimand tract lands around the site of present-day Brantford had become a serious problem. "Between 1798 and 1830 there was no legal reason for anyone other than Six Nations people to be on the land but the settlers kept moving in. As a way of controlling the squatters the Chiefs decided to surrender this land which was to be laid out in lots and sold to the settlers for the benefit of Six Nations," said Monture. "The issue of the squatters did not stop. The land just got filled in by new squatters." Adding to the Crown's problem in explaining where the money went when it accepted the surrender which gave it the legal authority to sell the land on Six Nations behalf is the allegation that the surrender itself was illegal. Monture says his staff have been unable to find a record of the Executive Council of Upper Canada giving its approval for the surrender. "There's no Order in Council for the townplot surrender," Monture says.