The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

uyr any. .3 montn planed wntn me U. r. 5.120 Aseoczauon will yield you in about 8 yuan A PRESENT of 3:00.00, or a prot of $41.40 over your month}! mvulcnts. THE NVE$TOR-WhY t 1 I $1oo.oo wit!h the 0. P. & L. Asggx. n?11.a3 doubled in :2 years, bes_nde receiving during the in- tcrvalz perannum pand to you every gix months? In n`fI-mt words. fnv Imrr Sunnnn vnn wnll running an larval 0/, pcranuuul pain (0 you every stx manual I In other words, for your $100.00 you will receive no Interest 366 and a Ibmp sum of $500, making a grand total of $256. 4,, . t.t , A vvuu-V- 7 An investment safe as government securities and much more protable, ruining the investor an equiva- lent to :5 per cent. per annum. simple interest. For printed matter and further` information call on (At oice of McCarthy, Peplcr & McCarthy) SEC.- TREAS. BARRIE LOCAL BOARD. an-tf TVENANT-Why pay rent. when, on such all monthlpagents, you gan become your own 113 - Ion! ? on ve the chowe of repayin at a monthly( rate of $1.20, $1.511, or $x.9o for can 8:00.00 bot- rowel. uvvvvwu ' TH Puauc-wh a an some money Qaggmonth glaxgdsereiga the .0 (and Special Facilities ojfered to Investors and Borrowers. 4 The Ontario Permanent . BmMmg and loan Association `V95 Dunlop-St, Ross Block, Barrie. {A001 Razors and Scissors ground and set on short notice. J. 0 UL VER W.ELL S Halrcutting and Shaving I Parlor OPPOSITE BARBIE HOTEL. BARBIE- I _ Lot 54 east side Mary street. Agpl; To-ST .VVES- LEY ADVANCE Onion. :6-tf. 0.H.LYoN, wooosrocx, ONTARIO, ' C5113 attention to the CHEAPER THAN crrv %% Pmcas. Evenings at residence, 67 Owen-St. }l2_3, Dunlap Strget. BU|LD]NG LOT FOR SALE. 4,(` `I E. DONNELL, Note Heads, Bill Heads, Letter Heads, Statements, Envelopes, Dodgers, Shipping Tags. Posters, Etc., Etc., Ego such Hr_\u\-_L._ I23 Dunlap Street. ,0O0. Ese their Lie their u -in -- ` QVOTY BRIE To Mr. Osler-Mr. Burton said he had been a business man on a large scale in Barrie for 29 years. He had been associated in Electric Light Com- pany since 1893. Sanford was the Manager and witness was President. He and Mr. Sanford and others had purchased the Electric Light. He did_ not know whether any person knew more about Mr. Sanford s' affairs than he did. They had no friendship asso- ciation whatever. He was on Finance Committee one year, but had no sus- picion that Mr. Sanford s accounts were not alright. He was impressed that Mr. Sanford was honest. He had been for several years in Bank of Com- merce and had received good testimon- ials as to honesty. He had gone to Mr. Pepler tosee if Mr. Sanford s be- havior was alright. He took this pre- caution during J une session of County a Council of 1893. Dr. MacAlister was the first member he had spoken to about it. He had not been asked as to suretyship before that. He could not say whether Sanford had approached "him after the Finance Committee's report of that session or not. No bond had been executed by him before that time. He did not remember sign- ing a bond prior to 1893, and produced by Mr. Osler. He did not remember being asked to becdme bondsman in place of Mr. Schreiber. He asked Mr. Pepler at one time if the report was true that his name was attached to two bonds. He was told that he was on only one bond. He did not remem- her that prior to the June resolution he had agreed to take the place of Schnei- ber. The matter may have been pro- posed, but if so it fell through. `He first saw Mr. Lctt in beginning` of July after seeing Mr. Pepler. Lett said he was going to get information about Mr. Sanford to see if everything was alright about the guarantee bond} The application of July 7th, 1893, had already been made. He knew before he executed the bond that the Guar- antee Company had a special form, though he made.no enquiries about it. He had nothing to do with Mr. San- fId 8 appointment as Treasurer further than speaking to two or three Council- lors. He did not canvas actively for him. Mr. Pepler gave him the`stro_ng- est assurance that everything was al- ght at the time he went on the bond. He did not know of his own knowledge that the Hamilton 6; Nprthwelternta bonds were out of the way. He was On the Finance Committee ofi'li8,9.1-' He may have glanced over and liabilities. -I1e ._saw the,.stateniet` showing the Ccllingwood He understood that the Finance Committee had-said..the"`dehe3i . tures were paid off. S _. _p Bu`UU \/V-"r v .. the personal sureties last. The con- versation was about July 1st, 1893, after session of County-Council. Later he asked Mr. Lett if an application had been made for a $10,000 bondin Guar- gntee Company. ~ Mr. Lett assured him that such was the case. He told him Mr. Sanford had been after him for surety, He said to wait awhile, as he wanted to make some enqui~:'ies.i He went back in a week or two,` and Mr. Lett said Everything is alright. I have the Warden s certicate that the Treasurer's books are alright. These assurances had considerable inuence in his signing the bond. .'He knew that when he went to sign the bond, Mr. Pepler had said the Guaran- tee Company had special bond, and this was the reason all the sureties were not in one bond. He had not seen the Guarantee bond. He did not know that they were liable only for each last twelve months. Not until Mr. Sanford had gone was be aware that he and Mr. Rogers were the only sureties for the period since 1893, that is that the Guarantee were not responsible all the time since that time. ' UUJII """""' V - ` ' ' " (Continued from page 2,`) 3 not like going on when six are going ,- 5 Mr, Pepler explained that HIlIl_-:._.- O ' North-Western Railway diehen-0 ilton 55 _ W63 were put in bank and that San- ford was going $10,000 personal-,aeouri. W This would reduce the amqnnt er money passing through his hands, therefore his responsibilities lees. There would only be about $20,000. in hands Mn Dunlap lI;l` H`. urn: WOW """- ' of-Treasurer. Mr. Phplhr said _ithwt_\s_ considered a mere matter of form. In case of any loss, there would come $10;-' 000 sgnfoz-d s properiy, then the Guest- antee company for $10,000. and than ___._I ....-un&:ou Inn TEA nan, Gdarantee --""""` vmnsus us. I-. % ~ sIH00E (Continued from page 2.`) A Z . H e strictly price {for __ `_._,..___,__ _,, dompany, _n`or-. 1 "`iii1;ee; 7 He roe WNW! in Torozno. ind. through lm !he had received the form enddgqve it to f Sanford to be lled ih. (He. had verbal- communioetion with Mr. Burtop. " Mr. Sanford bud told; the wiineeedshe bonds were being re-erranged; that he was putting up $10,000 seem-ity,_$10,000 `Guarantee Company, and $5,000 `each I____` `I, -. Tn from ~Mr. Burton and probably` Mr; Rogers. Mr. Burton asked him if . the Guarantee Company was going on the bond. He said he. understood they were. `To the best of `his knowledge\ Mr; Wright, `Warden, had certied to the correctness of the 'I`reasurer s books. He had forwarded the application about the middle of July. A T III`! I\ ___ -_ -.._J. To Mr. Osler-.-He had bilsineesv re lations with Mr.` Burton that year. When he, had business relations with Mr. Burton he usually went to Burton's oce. He A remembered` an interview with Mr. Burton as to whether Guaran- tee Company waa going on _the bond or not. 7 He said they were; Mr. Sanford had told him so. He. had the certi- cate both prior to and after the inter- views with Mr. Burton. . ax WARDEN rwronnn. Mr. R. E. Fletcher, ex- Warden, said that he was Warden of the County. in 1894 and had been in County Council two or three years before that, also in l 1895 and 1896. In. 1894- the-auditors were eMessrs. Cook and Dunn. He was acquainted with both the gentle: men.. During 1894- he did not remem- ber whether the Treasurer presentedea statement to the Council or not ; not whether he had any year or not,'fur-_ ther than what was presented to the auditors. He did not remember ever having received such a statement. The Auditors report contains all ~ that he knew of the position of County during` 1893. The Council did not take any steps to nally audit the Treasurer's books. The Council -did not attempt ._ to verify the Auditors report other `than adopting . it. There was no attempt outside of" the auditors to nd `the last cash balance. The auditors did their work in January, 1893. He `was present while the audi. tors were at work, though never ren- dered any assistance. ANeither of them was under the inuence of liquor; they were strictly sober. It is not true that they were intoxicated so far as he knew. He never told Mr. H. 1). Stewart that he had found these men intoxicated. . W` Mr. Oaler--He appointed `Mr. Cook because he considered him a com- petent man. . He had been auditor for years before` and no complaint made. TI-Ie had been a aucoeaafulbueineas man, was well `educated 5 was also paymaeter I of 36th Battalion. I " iii: remarked `that he _could `not take much notice of these qualications. ' -u Inn A I , U41 ; 1'1 - 32.1 ..-n. To Mr. A_ylesworth-He did not know until lately that the Collingwood debentures were an asset of the Coun- ty. He was not aware of it while he w'ds Warden. DR. MAOALISTEB. Dr. MacAlister, swom, said that he rst came to County Council in 1873, for ve or six years. then from 1886 to 1876. During that time he was Chairman of Finance Com- mittee from 1891 to 1896, and wasa member of the Committee before that. He was aware in~l89l that. Coilingwood debentures were an. asset. He probably knew of it before" 1891. He knew that Collingwood debentures were paid in .1889. 1890, 1891. He was not able to explain the absence of the Colliugwood debentures sincethat date. He was not sure that he missed it in 1891. He had a conversation with the Treasurer `- --- ml ___ 3-1---n-man "`lnn Il`:, illslhun VVIIVUIDI-vovu v---.. -.._ __,,,, , -in 1893 about these debentures. The Fi- nance Commitcee_ma.de itsesuimats in ses- sion of June,-1891. In the report of Dr. Ma.oAlister'for 1891, June session, no men- ytion is made of the Collingwood debentures -- n4A:__.1 1.-.: s..IA IA... 4.1.... Ml`. Elva IOIIDU |'Ull_I e 4-Av we-u not aware that the debentures had been taken out oi_ the Treasurer's hande and put into the` bank. He did not investigate, but took Sanford : 4 statement as true. The. Treaeurerewae generally present when` we were preparing` our estimates. The matter re debenture: was Tepoken of privately. not before the Committee. During his period of Chairman of Finance Committee be had made no investigation; The Auditorl . re- - - A1 L. LI... n.....m:l 1-`.InIn' mm-. FIOII ll ulnuv us View v....._ -__ _ as an asset. Mr. Sanford Zed toldrnim that the Collingwood debentures had been paid of. He had enquired concerning them, and Mr. Sanford had giveurthnt reply. He was _ _1-I._..L......- Inn` Innnn made no lVUBU|uu|vun - u - - _ _ . . . _~ port is presented to the Council, then` refer- red to the Finance Committee. The Com-- mittee would then glance or look over it and` pans in. Very often they looked over the accounts, though they never added up any of .the gure : or examined vouchers. * Here Mr. -Aylenworth read committee : report ,' in 1891 :-4"We have earefully ex- . amined the Auditors report and -are gratied" _to nd the nanoeg of _the Coun-ty in eo_`eatiu_- . factory condition. ' ' y 3- . Dr. MaoAlie tert naidto the a'tn_ueeu1ent'oi- the, court: that "thin exarninatlonv did __not_'; o, .. i'"""` '- ntdll nob` uen 5,"!-".'.?""!"1'.l'IY """"":_, .( `by the` Finance Committee. ` 993;`; `over; ~ mu _,VIVIi,'I';_; l`e`f_t;; s.eagu~s1y:.y;;eus semi Warden. l HP-. Warden-in I895, l .30! in`1896_vand-Mr..Sneath-in 1897. He ; would. lint like to become auditor onclthe; Evil!`-ll`00Coml_ilittee sstatement; They relied ` Wholly upon the Auditors ..report.' _ It would 5 quite. possible` ior Sanford to discount '0 5,000 notes,'w_ithout the county re-' calving the benet, and the `Finance Com- mittee know nothing about it. He had` no suspicions of Mr. Saniord s`di_shonesty. If`; Mr. Burton had asked him he would not have given a positive answer,'as it was his 003.30!!! to be canny. In report of estia mates for 1897, he mentioned some "four thcusand dollars, returnable from Provincial treasury. The money would come in in 1897, but as h_e_was not in council this year, he did not` look to see if that amount was- hforthcoming. Duringhis term `he thought Mr. Sanfordhad submitted sta / ents to the County Council, -according to `statute, said statement to be given half-yearly. This statement. he thought, showed the amount of cash on hand. `He did not speak ositively- Mr. Aylesworth assured him that the minutes contain no such statement. WARDEN SNEATH'S STATEMENT. ` Mr. Aylesworth here read a deposition of Mr. Sneath, Warden, taken some"two weeks . ago :--He /knew of his own knowledge that County Council possessed Collingwood de- bentures as anasset by hearing the matter discussed ` in Finance Committee. The Treasurer did not present a full statement of County nances previous to 1896. The only statement presented was an abstract of pre- vious year's accounts, to assist the Finance Committee in estimates. A Knew nothing about Sanford receiving refund ofmoney` from the Government. The auditors were , appointed to audit books of 1896'. They * started on duties on 28th or 29th Jan. C Auditors of previous years did not complete audit until June session. He did not know what stopped the Auditors report of 1897 from'being -`in before March lat. He had asked Mr. McEachern about it, and had been told that he could not complete it as he was not sure about the receipts, particularly the refund from Administration of Justice, To- ronto. Mr. McEachern intended personally writing about it. i ' ' Mr. Pepler, Solicitor for County, swore that he had looked up the record of the bonds. The first bond was drawn on March "27th,- 1893, but not executed till 29th of April. Concurrently with that he had to prepare another agreement, on account of other changes _in bondsmen. He-had sug- gested a new bond. From the books it was evident that the agreement was signed by. Mr. Stewart. Mr. Wilkinson refused to ex- ecute. The County was advised that Mr. _Burton s' bonds had been executed but not delivered; that Mr. Sanford was about to propose a new arrangement, therefore the whole matter was left in abeyance. He had no recollection of _the rst bond, therefore did not remember seeing Mr. Burton in con- nection with that bond. V On 29th June they had received from the County Council reso- lutions concerning new arrangements as to sureties. These were as already stated, viz., Burton. Rogers, Guarantee Companv and Sanford himself. The execution of bond by Burton was July 31st, 1893. Transfers of Electric Light stock, taking of mortgage, ete., were made on same day. In an inter- view with Mr. Burton he had no recollection of any hesitancy on the part of Mr. Burton. He had tried to recall the interview. The witness had not the slightest suspicion of Mr. Sanford." He had recollection of Mr. Burton asking the `reason of the change. All the knowledge he had was-contained in the resolution and this he hadscommunicated to _Mr. Burton. He thought they had no communication with Guarantee Company until after an interview with Mr. Sanford and Mr. Lett. Then it was stated that the Warden had answered the "questions in the certicate. The witness had written to the Warden asking if he had answered these questions of Guarantee Company and told him he had bettervbe careful, and to forward -him a` copy if he had kept one. Warden Wright said he -thought he had been careful, but had. not a. copy, but had better get a copy from the Guarantee Company.` This was received after some considerable delay. The witness said he had no knowledge of the 4 accounts of the County .at.any'time. ` r To Mr. Aylesworth--After Mr. . Sanford's ight Mr. Burton had come to him concern- ing the bonds. He was on only one bond. The first bond was never delivered, and the second bond which was executed was an en- tirely new allronnd proposal. WARDEN snnun. Mr. Snoath, Warden, sworn, said that the audits for the prior yearare not pre- sented till the June session. It is impos sible to nish the audit in time for January session on account of tax sales. There were two statements presented by the Treasurer -`-gone in January `to the Warden, a nancial statement to assist `Warden in` his annual address ;- the"one in June along with Audi- T tors statement, to assist in making a levy tor the next year. The formof the law was; complied with. A 5 ' ` on `IL. A'_'I-..__-`..s.I.` E - ,!3.'I r..-L `I-an--n an` BIDIG D0 unum one uuulu Ill bum: nu` unuusny . account of tax There were 3 by -one January a statement assist Warden in his address the one in J one with tors statement, assist in making for the next year. The formof law was complied with. ' ' To Mr. Aylesworth--He did not ` know of any `steps being taken to verify the Trea- surer's statement, "further the Auditors statement; I g _ A This concluded the evidence. v. - ' ma. ur.sswon'rn s ADDRESS. ;M:. Aylesworth contendedythat thisbond never was hindlngon Mr. Burton,,as hereu- tered into the hond,_on condition thatp"the: Treasurer : 'hooks'were.Ilright. Ith,`_ss`h`es_n:. _ _ _ iprovedpthat thsrewfssa lefalca`tiou_[then` oft; Osler submitted that no deiencegqan avail`- *6'r s}26:.'t00.i i `1ir.!i5.'ii.o"d:- . $1.13 '95` 5`.`i'.!`.1!!!'?-1'.1:-e. *1`"'*`;!'l'1d= "951 " - ` ' .'_s`i.t!1!'9i`?`1V? 7`.i.fthev' s;2o;oo9 A ` l\ `of; must .1 . Mr. Burton did, nor. were they supposed to ' eontinuationof the first. The Warden did P15 UIVIE Sanford was appointed to oice and was surroundedby his friends who were prepar-y ed to vouch for his honesty. On this part the County relied. The assurance that the County accounts were correct at the time the bond _,was given came from gentlemen" who knew no more about the matter than TU%\LI know. Mr. Osler held that Mr. Burton had been willing to enter into a bond in March, 1893, without any tormalities or precautions, and that the second bond was not the incep- tion of an entirely new transaction, but a not certify to anything more than that the accounts, so far as he V (the ;Warden) was awarewere found tons` correct.` "jg _fa,s,.it', was an echo of the vAuditon .".~report.` Mr. :..;..,e-,,;; ,:~~ '- soLIcrrbn F. E. r. PEPLER. . .i:*"ifAi-n~c*~IiI3n%uty asnec ;,,,,,_i e is: til.-.8 th.ey.,!I6r9 awn. . an: It-teal:-'!?`.`.9*i ! now-3!? M?-. P2!toh - evi--i dense; 1'vie- !F** we `m'opo;aad.-the c Compalyand Hr. Burton. - Any represen- tation made to one is Ill0._.l"`representation to the other, whether comm`unicat'ed-_to-the`, . other , or -not; 7-`Hence. any representation - `made to-the Guarantee -Company was also made toBurton., The Warderfs `certicate to the Guarantee Company must then be ac- cepted also as being" given to Mr. Burton. ` If the obligation of the Guarantee Company V is void because of misrepresentation of facts, so the obligation" of_ Mr." Burton is- void.- The Companyis liable only for the last 12- months previous to the notication to the Company of Sanford s' departure. _ -They were day by day being discharged ` from the bond, and no notication of this was given was nght, Mr.fBurton.,- The effect was most prejudi- ;s cial to Mr. Burton ; the amount of respon- sibilty the Guarantee Company got out of in this way was $13,000 nearly, while _Mr. Burton was not so released. Mr. Burton should also be released because of the gross neglect and inattention of the oicials. In fact there was no audit. N o more ridicul- ous thing can be imagined than that the - Auditors never looked into the bank book, which above all other `books of the -County should have been looked into. The audit was merely an addition of columns of gures. Dr. MacAlister knew all about the Collingwood debentures. He knew that $14,000 was due the County, -yet he took the Treasurer's word that the amount had been deposited, never trying to verify the state- ment. It was tantamount to laying so much money before a clerk without asking - A what had become of it. There is `a kn'own annual income of $4,000 from the Ontario Government, and in January when this amount was not forthcoming, no attempt was made by the Finance Committee to nd hute, arly. Lent. _P1-ate out where this had gone. The Warden T809: signedhalfa dozen notes and never maclean ' effort to see if these notes had been placed 1 to the credit of the County. That was gross carelessness and .neglect of duty.` In the matter of the $10,000 overborrowed, the bondsmen were not liable for any such over- draft, as such a proceeding was illegal. San- ford with a salary of $1200 draws with his own cheques marked " salary, $3,400 But cheques were not looked over until the horse was stolen. The Assistant Treasurer was placed there by the County to countersign all the Treasurer s cheques, he being intend- ed to act as a check on the Treasurer, and yet he went on signing. $14,000 County money was drawn during 46 months in- stead of $4,600, by cheques that are not County cheques. Some for salary and some - for private payments. And now the Coun- ty asks Mr. Burton to pay them back money which they through their appointeea_nd repre- sentative Stewart, Ass t Treas., knowingly i paid over to Mr. Sanford. Mr. Aylesworth contended also that Mr. Burton is released from all decits since February, 1897. The County was then told that they had exceed- ed their borrowing powers' by $14,000, yet not the slightest step was taken to investi- "gate where certain assets had gone, render- ing this overdraft necessary. The whole thing was done evidently to let the Trea- surer go on and get another $10,000 He referred to the duty cast upon County representatives by law. He quoted to show that it was the duty of the Treasurer to submit a correct statement of the County nances half-yearly. This the County had not demanded, but had passed_it over- The duty of the auditors was to prepare abstract and also detailed statement of receipts and expenditures, assets and liabilities, etc. They are to file their report within one` month. There was no sort of compliance with the statute in this respect. They are also required to show the cash balance at the beginning of the audit, where it is and what the security is. The Council is also required after the Auditors report. to make a nal of audit`. This the County Council neyer pre- tended to do, but agreed with the Chair- man of Finance Committee-,s statenientthat everything is in a_,ssatisfactory condition. ' MR. osmas ADDRESS. . Mr. B. B. Osler then addressed the Judge. He quoted from the bond, saying that the principals were to be liable to the amount stated in the event of defalcation ; also that the sureties were given independent of each other, or any other securities. He asked His Lordship-to accept the criticisms of the. defendant's counsel, ascoming from a man who had..been a member of the" council and knewof the ways and doings of the County. An astute manipulator ofgures and men can defraud his employers. u-nor u_o I.l.Ia4I,|,l ---- -'_.. nv. ._-_ -___.._-` -_-- Hie Lordanip here interpolated that this was quite true. and the beat evidencecf it was in the management of the Benchera" Law Society. This brought "forth loud laughter, -in which Mr. Osler, a Bencber, participated. H ` V ___3s,.-3 1. .1n__ ,3 ___l 'T. SlDSWORTH 5. son umm HANDLING. . .. II. SIUSWORIH X SUN, A MANU}?AC'1'UBING Conmcnonns. _ 3 FANCY BREAD AND CAKE BAKERS, Have Removed to their New Store, ~ 127 1`.-unlap Street. % umsms uumrs HOTEL. In returning thanks for the-very liberal patronage received at the old store, we beg to remind the public generally that we can now better serve them than at any previous time in our business history, and will be pleased to see them at the new stand-. r-2.lv t We have ut-chased and reopened the Ban-uie Steam Laun ry. 34 Bayeld street. with the latest R modern amaliances for all classes of work. PAT- IIIIUIQ A IJIIIIIH! I'I'lIIITC.'I`Il`T and I-navn ;a'55?n ;Ei.i`.1-;1l(:'eV "fa? "11"'13.s"of' Bi-'12. '"i'?i`i"-I RONIZ A HOME IN DUSTRY, and have Ann n-:nv na air I7(\IIF AAA? ` In liulllii A uuxuua l.I!lJa'1`lII., ana nave our ri call at your door. EPECIAL ORDERS DEL VEIIEIITIIE SAME DAY. STEAM LAUNDRY! Valuable Build` g lots for Sale -- IN 'rm:---' TOWN OI-LBARRIE. THE lllll El|ABl|E AUCTIDNEEB G. 23. FORD H-N%e%!!!I&a.hAe8e.Br- HANDLES ALL KINDS` or"! AUCTION sums. . GI RI Are a specialty, and parties intending to have sales, will consult their own interests by placing theix sales in his hands. l$'0rders left at Tm; ADVANCE oice will be {I-'onlwEN'rv-sEv:N YEARS We are now manufacturing o.ndTca.rry in goal: Stoves or the latest improved designs. ALL AND EXAMINE STOCK before going elsewhere. - - ' 41.! Ha 8EWREY- with the Guarantee Company doeanot help Mr. Burton any, as he knew that there was special contract with the Company. There in no case which shows that neglect of audit ,0:-carelessness on the part of the oiciala ireleaaea the, bondamon.` It rested with the `lliondsinen ahove all others` to look afterthe l'?oondtiet'of` the man for whom they were ,2-mua..;~ := ' -A 7 ` |nAnnI'.'sI_9_g_g_ wnnxs 2| CUT FLOVVERS--R(Nes, Carraations; Violets, etc, fresh every day, Bouquets-Button- hole. [land or Corsage. Funeral Tokens in any desi ns. VEGETAB ES-Celery, Crisp and Tender; Lettuce, Cabbage, Parsnips, Beets, Carrots, CCC. SEEDS -Flower Seeds, vcgetasxe seeds, Plants and Bulbs. WM. TAYLOR .. His Lordship took. elaborate notes -all I Kphrough ;; o_.lso mouioranda of`. all similar , inpqnood boob My-.A Ayleaworth and ` Mt; 031615 and r'ooeived_j}dgment.' ~ SEED STORE` I'I4\Jl\l Telephone :5. South Henry Street-Part of Lots :9 to 20. North Henry Street- Lots 1: to 20'. South McDonald Street-Lots 15 to- 20. North Elizabeth Street--Lots 19 to 20. East side`]ane Street-Lot 10. West Eccles Street-Lots 8 to 5. East Bradford Street-Lot 21. For terms and further particulars apply to MRS. WM. D. PUGH 9 l\ s. DAVIS. CHINA HALL FARM STOCK SALES gEcooK's BEST`!-Til-EN-D nnnpnql n! ll Ill IEAIIAIIA, Of tableware is the exception rather than the rule. If you would have your china closet always look well, buy your china from us We cannot insure against breakage, but we will guarantee to give you the best that can be had at any price. The best does not break as easily as the other kind. 7 D9. (SUCCESSOES TO E. S. LALLY.) UYUI\Y3h& I I IIII-III 'I'.`.:RG8`l' SALE IE! CANADA. FLORIST AND SEEDSMAN, mung up - wag nnnnl.1n-Qt 24 Dunlap-St.. Barrie. BARRIE GO TO THE NEW V DI3alaIJD1Vl1Vg :55 Dunlap-St., Barrie o .4. o V.---, Claremont, Ont. x-2-ly