Ontario Community Newspapers

Barrie Examiner, 21 Jan 1926, p. 3

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

utzeed. e 748. _ These Prices Good till Saturday, Jan. 23rd, 1926 CI08l OLD CITY BRAND BRAESIDE BRAND MAYFIELD BRAND YADVER'l-"lE IN THE EXAMINER nownrmnrs 1/ u,_ Breakfast Cocoa n BEAVER BRAND BONELESS 3 CHICKEN `rs lb. sis;-;:.XeH 23c| 23%. "Mahagerh 3Z 4- lb. TIN PURE .RASPBERRY WVZQ no nnvc WAFERS 25 lb. E-1R1s'r1E's L:4--`:Q STR'AWBERRY awn . . . 15 a . . . . . . . . .. 15 I . . . . . . . . .. 20: we . . . . . . .. 20 . . . . . . . . . .. 20 r . . . . . . . . .. 20 wood . . . . .. 25 II . . . . . .. 25 |B%%':_: 1 9c E111 TIGER CATSU_P IBACON FANCY QUALITY MACHINE SLICED 43- comm rnomm COMMISSION HEARS S SIX SIMCOE CASES h ` `in the community.` mission. _ . . ` _ In connection with the Guthrie Commissioner Cassels--1 must a l` t n from V charge there was an app ma gothe use i point. The practical problem is what N e fifs2i$1e1rciiin ?iiI$etei::_f(_ Sabbath. "3 PS`f` was at Counsel said they were wlllmg to ac-1 Mr Mason-Stroud and Lefroy had- C cept varying hours if nee be and , no interest in the manse yet they had n would bear their share of ma1nten- _ _ ance for church and shed_ The Un_ maintenance. In 1883, Richard Boyes. hnistsn had suggested that they gave a deed to" J S Lucas and 0th should_worshin together and thft `Eh: I trustees all living in the Churchill exfti E collection might be kept sepera e )1 got the field.._From 1880 to. 1393 Stroud; t their scheme was vague, 1ndetin1te,paid nothing to upkeep and over a C and difficult to work out. gHis clients eriod of 44 years only $22.73 per an- r am not desire to me with the U~- \ s:.`3;.`.;`:.i*e:`.%/.S`:2.`a `i.?.~3`"i`fr/.45? 2 tr der their minister. The mamtemmcVe_ _ . . E Presbyteans ha-V6 theifown Organ` Mr. Cassels-With these congrega-41 working together for over 40? ization and wish to carry on alone, a tions A 1 `very reasonable request. . years there was no thought of separa- ]( tion and so there seemed no need for The Ch3i1'mlan"`I can't see why it` any part to protect its interests by leg- ; . al technicalities. The manse should be} . was not agreed to -months ago. - ` treated as being owned jointly by the T] Mr Mason---The" V0-te wss %l'se'- ' three congregations 55 t 49' The expemmen 0 Join ` An extract from Presbytery minutes 1 `-159 0f `the church has m me m' ' of 1887 was read by counsel for the ap- . stances not worked out satisfactorily. pucants showing that stmud cng,.e_ . gation was then called. "The north When there are two congregations 0 V V the same size and character . there section or Second Innisfil." must be competition for membership Arrangement as to -Cemetery . This matte!` W85 At this point Mr. Mason introduced.` to the Sixth Line'_ `d d at a foint meetin and re- a suggestion as cons} ere 1 ` g `cemetery which has been managed by; ' d t th con re ation , lattsetrogg aversegv(ie_ He six trustees. two each from Lefroy,-, d d th t tinuin with the Churchill and Stroud. This cemeteryi 11 e1'St0 3 cm` 3 4 was laid out in 1852. the original trust- . same minister and C01` irtgeg being Wm_ `McConkey' Hugh lections was not acceotable to the andvJohn Goodtellow. Technically. said son, the property belongs to the non-concurrents, but Guthrie United i Mr. Ma V ' - ' _ United Church, yet he suggested that conggeatlon wa:rJ:rgmset-ggnfggg gpe the old arrangement be continued and 0,59 W 3 gh . V that the cemetery continue to be ad-'; 3011!`? use Of -1319 chine - ministered by trustees representing} Commissioner Cassels- It surely th_e same three congregations. This was would not hurt either the church or agreeable to the other side and also.` _ _ H,` ` _ _ to the Commission. nu! one non con an mm mm agree as to the ce_me_te_ry. _ > (Continued from page 1) 0 _ For the Presbyterians, Henry Ran- kin gave $2700 to $3000 as a. reasqn-` able selling price compared with other sales in the same part of the` culllann "Wang- noun nan Inn 01!` 3. other sales m -me same pan. 0:. bus vlage. Three years ago he sold a house in a better part of the town. warmer and slighy larger, with sta- ble and hot water heatingbut no wa- ter system, for $3300. ` IE8` agawxu, Lvx vuuvv _ Freeman G. Campbell told omy. mg to sell his father's house in . Gookstown, a larger house with more land attached. `He placed it-at $3000, then` dropped it to $2500 and is now offering It at $2100. Under-cross-em amination, he said thehouse is fairly old but in a fair state of repair ex- cept the roof. Mr. Mason suggested that they split the difference between his valu- ation of $4200 and the $3000 of the other side. `The Nicolston share on the two prices would be $1134. and $810 respectively. Half the differ- aaienn uynul hn $162.V`WhiCh added 110' 'rHunSD`AY,.' JANUARY .21. 926 1-_j-j $810vrespectively. new we unles- ence would be $162,'which $810 would bring the Nicolston share to $972. vm.:.. mm-.mmnn Mr. Macdonnell to $9.72. This proposition Mr. characterized as ridiculous. He was willing to pay 27% on $2500, which was $3000 less the amount of the mortgage. His clients were not pre- pared to pay an amount based onany valuation over $3000. _ The outcome was a ruling from the , Commission giving Cookstown and First Essa a month's option to pay $800 to Nicolston or let the property 1 be put up for sale, the net proceeds `, `to be divided on a basis of 2'7 and 73 E4 per cent. `after all indebtedness is is paid. _ Agreement re Guthrie.Manse : Mr. Mason next presented an :- agreement entered into between Guthrie United congregation and the` "Presbyterian congregations of Gen- tral and St. Andrew's, Oro, whereby; the two latter pay Guthrie $525 for; its share of the manse. Approval of; the agreemen t~w`as given by the Com- i mission. -c_har_ge application K Guthrie .--.. ...:......:m for the I [hurst_. ioint of the cnurcn. VCassels- surelyl hurt the people to allow these non~con- currents to use the building for ser- Mr. Mason-This is the only con-.,a curring church of a large number in this section. (Reglying to the Chair- man): Some of t e non-concurrents are within a reasonable distance of Central and St. Andrew's, but`o_tl_iers would have to go five to seven miles. He feared serious trouble over ad- ministration if joint use were per- mitted. . , mu- lnnh-mun--It basses my com- Quick Relief for Rheum atlcs Iltteu. . L The Chau'man- zjj Local Druggists Sell Rheum: on` Money-Back Plan l .' ---1-:1 If you suffer from torturing rheum- atic pains, swollen, twisted joints, and suffer intensely because yourrsystem ls full of that dangerous `poison: that makes thousands helpless and kills thousands years befo\tje.thelr time, than you need Rheuma, and need it now. V Start taking it toda,y.- Rheuma. lactsv sat once on kidneys, liver. stomach. and E1006. and you can sincerely 'excla.lm: Good rlddance to bad rubbish." - M9T1Y'pe0ple, the most skeptical of skeptics right in thi_s_ to\7i_';_1 a.qd"ln `the , ___A-- "4. 'G00d riddance bad rubbish-" the skeptjcal 0.1 this town and in the country hereabouts, bless the da.y`Wh6D Wm. Crossland and otherdrugglsts.of- fared Rheuma. to `the afflicted. at a small price and guaranteed` money re-r funded if not satisfied. If you IIBVG rheumatism get a bottle of Rheugat. today. - IIKIV: -.__.> If you haven't eye comfort, the chances are you haven't any sort of comfort. Theeyosi are closely connected with the nervous system; and when they are strained the results are. likely to be noticed in head-` aches and other ills. ` If you will spend an hour here some day, we will tell you about your eyes and supply glasses for. their comfort, if needed. Graduate Lauuauxuu WV, .... -..,__, College, `Toronto. 43 Elizabeth St.. Barrio. Phenol! TU Div --w.__., Graduate Canadian Op n..n...m "I'm-ant |1aov ieir share 01 Inu1uu:u- ...- ~-.., h Richard '1:s0yes,g ested on whose land .the ' l E3 d h t th a to J. S. other 3 3 t 3 9 end ht Sepgrate but ! of 1893 indemtefpaid iod . mm-1: nut. His ' De!` I_..... 1 ..++....m mmud was paying 40%,; n--T-It asses my com- iprehension why it gpould b 17f.5d Y-. A-.-.--L ` awn: Fnfvd prenension way it gguuu. In: ._..,...--. . Judgment was reserved but the Chairman _, intimated that the judge ment in the Hillsburgcase.represent- ed the opinion of the majority of the Board in such cases as this`. This would mean a recommendation that the etitioners be given the use of the c urch. , Another Manse Caise More churchhistory was contained in the Stroud-Churchill case than in M any of the others and it occupied much longer. Churchill and Stroud, which had been working together for many vain-1:, divided on the question of Union had been working togemer 1:01` mull: Ayehrs, divided onthe question Union and the manse at.Chu1`chili has been occupied by the United. minister. Stroud put in a. claim for a. third in- terest in thisgproperty. . M. Mnann cbntended that Stroud; terest in thiaproperty. Mr. Mason contended `that Stttoud 5 had no interest as a congregation; that any interest it.had was only in pro-' portion to the contributions or certain. members towards the cost ot_ the. manse, He maintained that when the: church was built there was only one ;' .... congregation concerned. namely Se`-l cond Innisfil which afterwards became! . known as Churchill. A section of this congregation `met at Hunter's Corners; (now Knock). Inasmuch as some of` these cont-ributed to the manse., Churchill was willing to let Stroudi have. a proportionate share, without` admitting any legal liability. These , contributions amounted to `about 8%: ' and this they were willing to allow.` Churchill paid $2017.65. without the site which was donated. g - ---u-- nu. 1ur..m1nn~nnll stated that site which was uuuuusu. , In reply, Mr. Macdonnell stated that ; prior to 1905. Stroud paid one-third of maintenance; from 1905 to 1920. 40% from '20 to '23, 35% and 28% after- wards. He held that the estimate 01 the ` original contributions at $153 was un- tairas various families mom the south end later moved to the north section. ,Going into history, he pointed out that prior to 1879 the Innisfil churches were at Craigvale, Central and Lefroy. Then owing to dissentions a -new congrega~ . I I er's Corners where regular services were` held. '1`hereIwere'two.mexnbers(of ses- 2 sion at Hunter's Corners but only one roll for the two places. This congrega- `ftlon built the manse. In 1886 Hunter's l Corners group moved into Stroud, still 5 the north section of Second Innisil.Lat- . ' er they moved over and worshipped with Craigvale. In 1909 the Craigvale church : i was closed and the congregationtmoved . : la... in` Qfrmld where a new church , i congregation muvuu ,iback to Stroud church - ; was built. A rearrangement of the In- - nisfil field reduced the congregations _ to Lefroy, Churchill and Stroud. * , 3` Ca.ssels--I don't see .h [that the original contributions is the' ,5point. is what the position at the time of-ta/king ' the vote. | '| Mr, Lno they - the benefit and so contributed to the Richard 'Bo,ve's,! house was *erected.l' to +.-"um:-.s: all living Churchill eng {5 Commission. | If you can agree cemetery, why not on the mane too?" asked the Chairman. There was no response. ...__._.-_.... .... m nu. value of the pro- \IIlI4t aaaa ..~... . Evidence as to` -the valu petty was then produced. real estate man, put the \ the glebe, at $3500. As a he cited 9. recent sale of 2 at Palnswlck with an ac: comm ru.uu:vvu.n vv .-... ..-_ -_, ` | there was also an uuuu u ........ at $2500. . -- .-. For the opposite side Rev. J. E. Mc- 250 given by four members of t e Cere- .Ewan. United minister at Churchill,` well family. The United-Church are was first called. For a man on a mod. g holding this church. for which they lary it is a brute of a house." : have no use, and also the endowment. he said. It is 45. years old and of brick 3 -He asked that the Presbyterian min- `veneer. Last night, when an east wind: ority on the 66-32 vote beigiven a rea- with agood fire in the i!ur- sonable share of the property. was blowing, `nace we could not sit quietly ina single Mr. Mason contended that this min- room. It is_ - xheat. It has nine rooms but we have elsewhere, there being five Presbyter- are living`, ian churches within a radius" of seven shut up the dining room and in the kitchen{ also have closed two miles. I-Ie said that this non-concurrent rooms upstairs. the result being that? group could not live under the cir- `two adults and six children sleep in curnstances. In Presbyterian churches three bedrooms`. The central part is around the minorities got none of the l sagging badly and the plaster is crack-y assets. so it was unfair that the United `Church should be asked to hand over (no `The one redeeming feature in the . . p .. -__._- Id-a .,....+. in Rand Head. He had no 'three bedrooms. The central pan. 1 crack-g ' ing. `The one feature ` ~ manse is the hardwood floors: they're beautiful. There are leaks over the {bay window and elsewhere. The main_ proof is 45 years old. There is a good ' cellar but no modern conveniences." l Reeve G. C. Allan. who has had ex`- . ' perience as a contractorwsaid he could tr not conscientiously ask more than` t` $1600 for the property including the 5 -stable, which he valued at` $2.00. It I wasn't worth within $400 of a. property of his own in the village which he was tottering for .$2.000.,the upkeep of the` .latter being much less. Asked by Mr. ` Macdonnell to put a replacement value upon the house, he declined to do so. Counsel then proceeded to the argu-; ment. Mr; Macdonnell claimed that as C the manse belonged to the Second`! Innisfil-congregation. the north section, ( -which became known as Stroud. was ` = as much entitled to its share as the ( other. The former went to Craigvale , and joined with them but took with` 1 it whatever interest it had and this; was owned by the united congregation.` 1 Moving back from Craigvale `to Stroud : this cong1`egation`pa.id.its share of_ the i maintenance of the manse. Though legally entitled to a .;m1t interest. ' would be willing to `take one-' half. A ' - Mr. Mason maintained that the deed being vested in trustees all belonging to Churchill, and Hunter's Corners. 1' having no church. was part and parcel `d -of Churchill and had no rights separate 18 from 11;; that in due time it. lost its ids it entity in Craigvale congregation. It was ' ~ C t of a_. congre- Stroud en II. V! Inn-vv . -_ wa b congregation` , titled to interest,!; (1 would one-; ack Strou all belonging Corners. church. parcel of and rights separate ' it in congregation. s owned united congregauuu. ` paid its 5 have shocked the people in 1880 if any- one had said that Hunter's Corners owned half the manse. Through their ministers occupying the manse Strond had enjoyed full benefit for less than $2 00 a month. As a matter o: la; and 8% of $1240, so they. couldjnot be en- titled to more than $100. ' Mr. Macdonnell rep11ed_tha.t`_hls poo; , $3600. a. co;npa.nson_ :ent a frame house, acre of land for` as the cemet.ery,' xe mane 16I`8 I value of n W. J. (Iowan. m, value. without`, cognparisonf A111 male of a y F.` .J. Cowan.l whereas the Presbyterian cnurcu was ue. valued at $5,000 and the manse at $2,- zognparisonf 500. United ministers are occupying` rame both parsonage and manse. In con- land nection with the Presbyterian church there was also an endowment of $8.- . given the mod.9holding' '- -1---- : mm..- nn mm. and also ALT!-{Y Elihu O. CIIICAOONIQ pie. claimed an `interest not as `individ- uals but as a section of the conerrega-' tion. so recognized by Synod. Up to 1893 the contributions were` made to a common .fu`nd so there ;was -no reason for a. separate statement. In 1903 they were recognizedas .a separate congre- gationand from that on contributed to maintenance. a third or rmore. Mr. Mason's contention as to Stroud losing a... Idnnfifv in nraizvale was a pee- Mason's contenuun as w uuuuu ........... {ts identity in Craigvale was pee- uliar argument for counsel for the` United Church to make. - 7 :-4_- -_a. ..-u... nanny-nod flu: l'!`1il.l`-' Unlteu Uuuruu LU unagsv. ' Judgment was reserved. the chair- man. remarking: This will give the Commision something to think about. Alliston Minority asks Church The next case was an. application` from the Alliston Presbyterian minor- V ity asking to, be given Knox Church. "In Aliiston the vote was 144 to 63 for ~-Union; in Burns C,hurch._e4 miles north, '88 to 2. while` Nicolston, 3 miles` east. I went in without a. vote. 1-.....a.. T-Tnrnf. a member or the non- lwent in without a. V0128. - Louis Hurst, a. member uconcurrent group, testified to the }church situation in his town and also `as to the location of Presbyterian con- igregations in the surrounding country. He said a. few Methodists came from jthe vicinity of Burns and Nicolston to ?Alliston'to church: also some Presby- `terians. He had examined the Wesley `church and estimated the seating can- acity at 460. This the opposing coun- . sel figured out at 14 inches to a. person. u mm Austin. a member of session out at 14 mcnes to a. peruuu. I Wm.. Austin. a. ~ 3for the Presbyterian minority, said `;they were meeting in a hall `over a store and their attendance for 13 Sunx days had averaged 70. They had 74 members on `the rolls and .85 adherents and a fully organized congregation. __ Norman Morrison and Lyman Newell also gave evidence as to seating- cap- acity of the Methodist church. J. J. Williams, for the` Unionists. testified that Knox seats 306. Wes- ley 297 and Burns 151. His calculation was based on four sitting _in the side seats and eight in the centre. He had counted the attendance in Knox for the last four Sundays and it had run from `110 in the morning to 144 in the even- Inn- ing. Chas. R. Knight, Recording Steward, .` had kept track of the attendance in `Wesley Church for the last four Sun- days and reported it morning and ev- ening as follows: 145 and 166. 103 and p 230, 200 and 261, 151 and 145. giving 1 " certain explanations as to weather. etc;. to account for` the range. He thought 261 a fairly average congrega- jg tion. For any service out of the or- L dinary they had to bring in seats and chairs. At union services in the sum- ` mer the church had good full houses. ` Normal Sunday School attendance was yfroml 175 to 200, the accommodation i Macdonnell to explain why the United 5 Church in its Nicolston application had lgiven the seating capacity of Wesley 1' Church atl450, witness said he knew 1 nothing of it. p '_ 3' In his argument. Mr. Macdonnell iv. took Alliston, Burns and Nicolston as ' -u-- an ..1.un~n`ln nnrnnl`-IS. .l..LU 4 m notmng ()1. .l|.. \ _ itook Burns 'one community for church purposes. Formerly Methodists living near Burns and Nicolston had come into Alliston I because they. regarded that as the centre. Since the vote the situation is reversed and the minority group ask" ; the Alliston church as a centre for their ' people. The minorityis well organized and able to carry on. If it had a proper ;place of meeting it would be larger. `He contended that normally Wesley `church is quite large` enough to hold 1 the two congregations of former Meth-' iodists and Presbyterians. A number 1 of the Methodiists -could attend at Burns and Nicolston. where they might _ naturally be expected to go. It was much morereasonable to ask them to do this than to see a strong minority left without a. church. * Mr. Mason pointed out that from the figures produced,'Wes1ey church was inadequate for the two congregations. l_.If the few families belonging to Burns ,` and Nicolston withdrew it would leave. ,; a congregation much too large for Sone church to hold. This anblied to }I Sunday School as well as church. He _{held that the minority had no good 3; reason for expecting to be given the 1 church under the circumstances. Judgment was reserved. The Bond Head Case .. In introducing the application of the ;Presbyterian minority at Bond Head 1 to be given the church. Mr. Macdonnell 3 pointed out that the Methodist and 0.` Presbyterian sections of the United e t 5 Church had gone together. using the V. Methodist church and leaving the Pres- byterian church unoccupied. The value of the Methodist church was put at - $9000 with a. parsonage worth $2000, 1. Presbyterian church was .4.` ....a.....a ..+ :5 mm and $2,- should 7 terminate. Rather sarcastically Mr. Macdonnell referred -to thegenerosity of an offer of a. church for which they had no use, -while they hung on to the endowment and manse. Although Mr. Mason doubted continuance he wouldn't even offer a deed subject to reversion, ' knowing very weli.that one way to =hamper development, is to tie the oc- cupancy up with conditions. There was -no evidence to warrant the suggested discontinuance. Mr.` Macdonneil stat- ed that the Presbyterians had a. good congregation at Bond Head and had ~..-...m+w nailed a minister in conjunc- {ority could easily oe accummuumw , fgroup could ........+s an if was unfair around got none 01 um it `Church.should its assets in `Bond Head. wish to cripple this group as long as it could carry on as a congregation and "suggested that the minority be given the entire use of .the church for three years at a rental of $1.50 a week. on the understanding that if it ceased j to` carry on for three months the lease should noon nnrcasticallv Macdonnell '- er andlessee, Mr. Cassels suggested mun. '; Mr- Mason might stretch a` point and -V give a deed of the property to the Pres- byterians as had been done in some other cases. but Mr. Mason said his congregation could _not see their way clear to do this and the Commission recommended that his offer of a five- year lease at a yearly rental of-one dollar be accepted. :-_ congregation at Bond neau mm mm recently called tion with Cookstown. , _ - i Mr. Mason pointed out` that a union between ._the former Methodist and Presbyterian congregations had been effected about a week nreviousiy `which made, it possible to give the :continuing Presbyterian congregation ,the entire use of thexchurch. which would have been impossible without this union. ` Mr. Mason" said that whatever ar- rangement was made it would have to beisubject to making the church avail- able for burial services. To this Mr. Macdonnell readily agreed. , q+..+1ng-~--that there is a sentimental Macdonnell readily agreea. Stating `that there differenceAbetweenVthe position of own- and.lessee, Cassels suggested that .mr~.- Manon might point_ V Get the habit. ead T.-1:6 Examiner Olassieds, each_ week. They oer many money-savmg opportumtiea. mt` tannin zxmtnan .. Mrs. Jas. Prince is _under the doctor si care. T _ I Dr. Spenceley` was in Barrie on Sat- urday. - There are two scarlet fever cases in; -this community. . I . Rev. W. T. Johnson is rapidly" im- proving in health. Mrs. J. R. Couse spent Monday of this week in Barrie. Mrs. Frank Leeson has had a. radio installed in her home. . Ma Q nnlnman nf Toronto is vis-. gaww&mw&&g&%&w& E % COOKSTOWN {RD installed in net nome. Miss S. Coleman of Toronto is uvis-"I iting at her home here- J.` R, Flynn passed the week_-_end with friends` in Beeton. . Mrs. J. Cunningham spent the week-' end with friends V in Barrie. Miss Hazel Clute has accepted a position as teacher in Wyevale. -cu -.. nrnnolnvn nf '1`)-u-nrui-n in 1:-Ininnr puauauu an uvuunavn nu. y-gvvu-... .Mrs. Westlake of Toronto is `visiting with her mother, Mrs. Geo. Duff. n .~.___....._ ..a m........... 1'1'...:.m..{.uu WQLII IIUL mnvynnun, `-4- an \aVvu Q1`--0-v N. S. Sumner of Toronto University spent the week-end with A. R. Oke. ' Many from here attended the dance at Elmgrove on Friday evening last. Mr._a.nd Mrs. K. Lawrence visited friends in Thornton over the week- and LIIULI _end. (`In _ena. . Cloverhill L`O.IJ. held a successfull gace on Friday evening in the town a . V - Miss Lou Dinwoody met with an ac- cident recently when she fell and broke one wrist. l 111- TIT `M'n1\/I'inon man nnlln nn wrlst. W. W. McMillan was called on Tuesday morning to see his father at Burlington. Mica 'N|'n1-in} Tnhlaw Of Bond Head Jsurungton. Miss Muriel Loblaw of Bond Head was the guest of Miss Jean Arnold over the Week-`end. 117.-ullnna 1'\nnrnnr nf wtriiffn me WeeK-ena. Vvallace Downer of Wycliffe College conducted the services in St. John's Church last Sunday. _ . Mrs. Ross Harriett of Toronto- is visiting with her grandparents, Mr. and Mrs". Jas. Donnell. f\nvIna in 9111: mild umnfhnr .T_ E. and Mrs. Jas. Uonneu. ` Owing to the mild weather J. E. Parks was unable to hold his mo cas- sin dance on Monday night. _ ' 1xrn...1 Inna mannhyn thin weal: nf the: Word was received this weekof the: death in Toronto of Mrs. Geo. Fildey, mother of Mrs. Robt. Marling otthisl place. _ Married--Af 1-he Rectorv in Cooks- sln dance Monday nlgnt. : I place. Marr1ed-At the Rectory town on Friday, Jan. 15, Mr. Albert Vallance to Miss Laura. Duvont, both of Alliston. | m 1.1 Dnhinunn A-nfm-tainm-1 9 nnm- OI AIIISEOH. F. H. Robinson entertained a num- ber of his friends on Monday evening. The time was spent in games and all thoroughly enjoyed themselves. Grief over the death of his mother caused suicide of Ignaz Mansch. cele- brated Austrian portrait painter, at. Vienna. The Quickest Way is by % Direct Toll Service It is no longer necessary to ask for Long Distance in. calling any of the places listed below. Just give the local operator the name of the town and number of the distant telephone and hold the line while connection is established. i If the line called is busy your operator will take your num- ber and call you later. If you do not know the number ask Information. Direct Toll Service is available to each of the following plac- es at t-he rates quoted. If you must speak toa particular person, give the details of the call to the Long Distance operator. `St:-oud . . . . . 10 `Ivy . . . . . . . . . . 10 "`Lofroy . . . . . . 10 "O:-o Station . . . . . . 10 ""Mineaing . . . . . . . . 10 `Camp Borden . . . . 10 * For 5-minute talks; Coolntown ....... Elmvalo . . Alliston . . Creomore Orillia Stayuer V . . Collingwood . . Midland . . .` . . Newmarket . . . . . . . all others 3 minutes. Wilson : The Bell Telephone Company ` of, Canada % W. E. BREWSTER, . . . . . . ntion 13 10: Borden 1155. li'J'T"i'iR ' CHOICE HANDPICKED _._._____._. :1 ` nag _CRl-ZAMERY

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy