The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

rC ii M pSteseszs c- rT Kfi V gJrflfT SOS v ft i J fcPSiS ill jT ifES EKE jvji 1l33j A- s Hie Editor like to to ftrfWel written iy in your last issue where fife Court to strikes in disputes Mr whom I respect very much ap parently hasnt given much thought to this subject or he wouldnt have made such state ments he does in other wise written article First should point out that we in the hour movement are anxious to settle our disputes without resorting to strike ac tion and that we exhaust- every other possible avenue before ask ing pur membership to take such action But unfortunately the companies take advantage iy weakness loophole in 2 LBS 29c the Labour Relation Act to fore stall good bargaining- and it ti necessary in Some cases to strike a plant in order to get a decent contract y The question there is should management be forced by legis lation to bargain in good faith Tin afraid a Labour Court would not change managements atti tude towards good faith bargain ing unless there was some pen alty levied if they failed to do so Mr Harvey says that the right to strike is a special privilege and like other special privileges such as tariff protection for manufacturers subsidies for min ers and floor prices for farmers should not be tolerated He apparently confusing special pri vileges with democratic rights It is the right of a worker to withhold bis labor to get satis factory working conditions Just as it is the right of management to demand protection for his pro duct and for the farmer to be guaranteed a satisfactory price for his produce Socalled spe cial privileges come as a matter of right in a free society Would Mr Harvey please ex plain what would happen if La bour or management disagreed with the Labour Courts decision be binding on both par ties so is that not a viola tion of democratic rights I say yes because there are many faults to be found with a Labour Court such as incompetence po litical interference and delay in handling disputes Labour would certainly welcome a workable alternative to strike action but it must be a system which would not interfere with the democratic rights of either parly Nov Mr Harvey how about writing article on another mat- dealing re fer to the evils of I fed it attention paid to- this serious problem as to people that At New Tuesday March James J of Ada St New Toronto and father of Harry and Frank Howard Don Mills Mrs Lloyd valei and Elsie Mrs D Oldham of Resting at the Arthur Ridley Funeral Lake Shore at St Toronto Funeral Friday March at am to St Teresas Church 10th St New Toronto for requiem high mass at am Interment St Newmarket upon ar rival motors At York County Newmarket on Friday Edward Frank husband of the late Emily Frances Jones Service Service was held on Tuesday PNSTRA At York County hospital Thursday Mar to Mr and Mrs Bert Boonstra Bradford a son- York County Sunday Mar to and Mrs Lowell Bray Newmar ket a daughter BARNEY At York County hos pital I riday Mar to Mr and Mrs Barney BROWN At York County hos pital Monday Mar 12 to Mr and Mrs Robert J Brown a daughter SAKER At York County hospi tal Monday Mar to Mr and Mrs William J Baker Concord a daughter County Tuesday Mar to Jmea BIcket a daughter Kenneth oaii Don Mills are happy to announce the arrival of their Susan Diane on Thursday Mar atWell- hospital Toronto York County A to Mr and Mrs Robert Clark New market a daughter York County hos pital Saturday Mar 1956 to Bradford a daughter l York hoi pita Wednesday Mar 1956 to Mr and Mrs Clarence Dug- 2 a son York County hos pital Thursday Mar 1950 to Mr mid Mrs Newmarket a son York County Mar to Mr and Mb Eric Maple a son At York County Mar 1956 to Mr and Mrs Henry Aurora a son ifnmil Mrs dufhter TCMPLEAt her late residence Clair Ave E Toronto on Friday March Marg aret Jane wife of Joseph Temple mother of William McDonald of Hair McDonald of Roy Mc Donald of West Hill Morris McDonald of Toronto and wni of daughter of Mrs Nellie Irwin of Newmarket and R J Also survived by 11 Service Was ffiSLSS SSW March In- York is YOU A BETTER COMTUNITY vK NOTKE Va t I OWN iSWSfcl eel S Tii axtjf Residents of the town of Newitiarket are ribtif that the provisions of a Resolution relating to dogs be strictly enforced The Resolution provided that Any dog running at large contrary to the jprl of this Resolution be seized and impounded or killed or sold or otherwise disposed ajsik constable or by such other persons be duly authorized so to do Except where any dog on the owner or keeper thereof any dog which is leash and under the immediate charge a a competent person shall for the purposes of this be deemed to be running at large The foregoing provisions apply the dog is licensed or inoculated and will be enforced iC Dogs which have been impounded and not within hours will be degiTyy Dated at day of Marc ffi SB ri J v a f j mm i- i Frank a fiSl J i Svjuliiby at jw v -r- t 1 Cr JFSftf j j VrMiv ffiiilr i V ivv J a fc Vv CUiifSv It f r fee WSiMSWfM Sft i v I- V3 V tj t Mr i a i p i f A i V T I p Vo I I i I J fc jn it iSW S t r- y A A i J iJt Wore I f I l I ws -r- W J l t Pauls Mr Ton Mr David Riddell and Charles Fred At York Simliiy iiaTU 1956 Jo Hilt a daughter v ir t rT Jf Vt 538 7 ia j aiac t all a i I mm ff KVl 3 ips C J MS ssa v vVVrtV c in iJ v ft mm easy to Kclcaii i VX FOOD 2 tins 2k miS A NEW CARROTS lender v- r ffVS sr ifS v i Kg as w- Burns AWhfari us 1 wo ft V I I N Sin fc i ijv I zM vi i ii t